Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain

November 3, 2015 updated by: Yong Chul Kim, Seoul National University Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain: Randomized, Controlled, Comparative Study

The investigators conducted a randomized, Double blind, and Controlled Study to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators expect pain improvement after treatment with 3 mg/kg of lidocaine, continuously infused in normal saline 250 ml.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Yong Chul Kim
        • Contact:
          • Yong Chul Kim, PhD
          • Phone Number: +82-2-2072-3289
          • Email: pain@snu.ac.kr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jee Youn Moon, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy
  • NRS score > 4
  • stable oral medication during the 1 month trial period
  • volunteers with informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy
  • pain from causes other than upper 3 indications
  • hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics
  • important disease of heart, kidney, liver or incurable disease that may affect the assessment of adverse effects, or may interfere with the completion of study
  • severe conduction block
  • history of other interventions that may affect the study
  • Enrollment in other clinical trials within 30 days
  • otherwise not suitable to study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline
  • normal saline
  • total 250 ml
  • once a week
  • 4 times
Normal saline continuous infusion
Other Names:
  • 228714BIJ, ISOTONIC SODIUM CHLORIDE DAEHAN PHARM. CO., LTD.
Active Comparator: Lidocaine HCl
  • lidocaine 3 mg/kg mixed in normal saline
  • total 250 ml
  • once a week
  • 4 times
lidocaine continuous infusion
Other Names:
  • 183903BIJ, Lidocaine HCl inj. 2% DAEHAN PHARM. CO., LTD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
11-point Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1 week after the end of intervention
Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
1 week after the end of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
measurements of pain intensity, functionality, and impact of pain, rated on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain]
at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
Shot Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
15 pain descriptors ranked on a 4-stage intensity scale, the Present Pain Intensity index ranked on a 6-stage intensity and VAS (100-mm scale)
at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
7-point scale from very much improved to very much worse
at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention
Number of patients with grade 3 through grade 5 adverse events that are related to study drug, graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0
Time Frame: through the study completion (7 weeks)
AEs, laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, finding from physical examination The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events v 4.0 on five point scale (grade 1 to 5: mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and Death)
through the study completion (7 weeks)
11-point Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the end of intervention
Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
4 weeks after the end of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yong Chul Kim, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on Normal saline

Subscribe