Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: a Meta-Analysis

February 6, 2017 updated by: Julien Magne, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), the prognostic value of reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is well known. Consequently, there is class I indication for surgery in these patients when LV ejection fraction <50%. However, there is growing evidences suggesting that subclinical LV dysfunction, and more particularly longitudinal myocardial dysfunction, may be a powerful early predictor of outcome, even when LV ejection is still preserved. In asymptomatic AS patients with LV ejection fraction >50%, a reduced LV global longitudinal strain, as assessed using speckle tracking imaging with transthoracic echocardiography, may be an accurate marker to identify early subclinical LV dysfunction and thus, to improve the risk stratification, the management and the timing of surgery. Several mono-centric observational small studies recently reported results emphasizing the role of LV global longitudinal strain in AS patients. Therefore, a meta-analysis may be conducted and may provide meaningful data. The investigators hypothesized that LV global longitudinal strain is a determinant of outcome in asymptomatic patients with AS and preserved LV ejection fraction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Limoges, France, 87000
        • CHU Limoges

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Asymptomatic patients with at least moderate aortic stenosis (mean pressure gradient >25mmHg or aortic valve area <1.5cm²) and left ventricular ejection fraction >50%.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • studies selected in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Google Scholar, published between 2005 and 2015 without language restriction according to the following criteria: "aortic stenosis" AND "longitudinal strain"

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Studies reporting global longitudinal strain derived from VVI and not speckle tracking analysis.
  • Studies with cohort of patients with aortic valve replacement indication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Preserved LV GLS

Patients will be compared according to the level of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) as derived from transthoracic echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis.

Two groups will be compared regarding outcome: preserved LV GLS vs. reduced LV GLS. The definition use for reduced LV GLS will be >-16%. An optimal threshold would also be calculated and derived from the pooled data.

Reduced LV GLS
The definition use for reduced LV GLS will be >-16%. An optimal threshold would also be calculated and derived from the pooled data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Combined outcome of death and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (including aortic valve replacement)
Time Frame: up to 10 years
up to 10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Combined outcome of death and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (without aortic valve replacement)
Time Frame: up to 10 years
up to 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Erwan Donal, MD, PhD, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Subscribe