Salivary Biomarkers in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

September 12, 2017 updated by: Valleywise Health

Studying the Significance of Salivary Biomarkers in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

By studying individual biomarkers in body fluids such as saliva, there is a potential for detecting injury to the brain resulting from an acute traumatic even that may not be detectable by conventional neuroimaging like CT scans.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Although identification of biomarkers following TBI is a rather novel area of research, few studies that have been done in patients with severe TBI and biomarkers from serum and cerebrospinal fluid have shown to have prognostic significance. However there are no prior studies looking at biomarkers in salivary specimens. In this study we will include patients with moderate and severe TBI who require inpatient admission, and will study 3 specific salivary biomarkers. This is a unique project, since salivary specimen collection is easy and non-invasive and can be collected at any site even on a sports field by using a simple absorbable swab resembling a cigarette stub, unlike blood or CSF that can be highly invasive. Salivary specimens can also be frozen and stored for long periods of time prior to testing. If our study detects abnormalities in levels of these biomarkers when compared to healthy controls, and children with extra-cerebral injuries, in future studies we can look at children and adolescents with minor head traumas and concussions who are discharged from the emergency department after evaluation, and study their long-term outcomes and correlation with salivary biomarkers.

Specific aims:

To study levels of three specific biomarkers in salivary specimens (GFAP, S100B and NSE) in children with moderate TBI (GCS: 9-12) and severe TBI (GCS: <8) admitted to a pediatric trauma referral center. These biomarkers have been shown to have prognostic significance in prior studies using serum and CSF.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
        • Maricopa Integrated Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

1) Children aged 0 to 20 who present to the pediatric ED or trauma bay with an isolated acute head injury (moderate or severe) and are admitted for inpatient management; 2) pediatric patients who present to the ED with non-trauma complaints; and 3) pediatric patients who present to the ED with non-head trauma such as musculoskeletal injuries.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 0 to 20 who present to the pediatric ED or trauma bay with an isolated acute head injury (moderate or severe) and are admitted for inpatient management;
  • Pediatric patients who present to the ED with non-trauma complaints; and
  • Pediatric patients who present to the ED with non-head trauma such as musculoskeletal injuries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with multisystem trauma;
  • Patients with minor head trauma (GCS 13-15) discharged from the pediatric ED
  • Patients with other pre-existing neurological conditions (such as cerebral palsy, chronic seizure disorder, VP shunts);
  • Patients with a history suggestive of head trauma from chronic abuse;
  • Incarcerated patients or patients from juvenile detention facilities;
  • Refusal of parent/patient to participate for any specific reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control Group 1
Children with non-trauma complaints
Control Group 2
Children with non TBI and musculoskeletal trauma
Cases
Children admitted to hospital with moderate/severe isolatedTBI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Levels of 3 specific salivary biomarkers (GFAP, S100B, and NSE)
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of injury
Within 24 hours of an acute isolated TBI
Within 24 hours of injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glasgow Coma Scale measurement of injury severity
Time Frame: Day 1
Glasgow Coma Scale is a score between 3 and 15, 3 being the worst, and 15 the best. It is composed of three parameters: Best Eye Response, Best Verbal Response, and Best Motor Response. A Coma Score of 13 or higher correlates with a mild brain injury, 9 to 12 is a moderate injury and 8 or less a severe brain injury.
Day 1
Brain CT Scan abnormalities suggesting significant brain injury
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of injury
Dichotomous measure: presence or absence of such abnormalities
Within 24 hours of injury
Need for mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: During hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Mechanical ventilators are used for patients who cannot breathe by themselves. Dichotomous measure: whether or not mechanical ventilation is needed.
During hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Need for neurosurgical intervention including ICP monitor
Time Frame: During hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Dichotomous measure: whether or not neurosurgical intervention is needed
During hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Patient's Length of Stay or hospitalization
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Number of days spent in hospital
Duration of hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Final disposition
Time Frame: At end of hospitalization (up to 50 days)
Polytomous measure: Discharge to home, discharge to rehab, or death
At end of hospitalization (up to 50 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Claudia Yeung, MD, ValleyWise Health
  • Study Director: Kevin Foster, MD, ValleyWise Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Subscribe