Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel Plus Epirubicin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Epirubicin in Breast Cancer With TEKT4 Variations

October 30, 2019 updated by: Zhimin Shao, Fudan University

Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial and Biomarker Analysis of Paclitaxel Plus Epirubicin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Epirubicin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced HER2-Negative Breast Cancer With TEKT4 Variations

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety between paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin when used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Taxane-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone treating breast cancer, however remarkable percentage of breast cancer patients presents with primary or secondary taxane resistance. Currently no established biomarker has been reported clinically for predicting taxane sensitivity. Our previous study indicated that TEKT4 variation decreased the stability of intracellular microtubule, and TEKT4 variant cells behaves higher resistance to microtubule-stabilizing agents such as taxane, while enhanced sensibility to microtubule depolymerization agents such as vinorelbine. This study is intended to confirm that TEKT4 variation predicts the prognosis of taxane-based chemotherapy through the prospective clinical trials.

This study intends to evaluate the efficiency and safety of two neoadjuvant therapies: paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin, in treating locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variation.

Primary endpoint of study: pathologic Complete Response (pCR). Secondary endpoints of the study: Objective response rate (CR+PR). Exploratory endpoint: Based on pretreatment tumor and matched blood samples, the correlation between biomarker and efficiency is explored.

This open single center prospective randomized control study includes patients locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative patients with TEKT4 variation diagnosed with histopathology and Sanger sequencing. Patients randomized to Group A or Group B to receive respective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among which Group A: PE x 4 cycles (paclitaxel + epirubicin), paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. Group B: NE x 4 cycles (vinorelbine + epirubicin), vinorelbine: 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.

Patients of both groups were performed with diagnostic puncture before treatment and over half of treatment course in order to obtain information about dynamic change of Ki67 and other parameters; Surgery will be performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, followed with subsequent adjuvant therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: 18-70 years old
  2. Expected survival > 12 months
  3. Baseline ECOG Performance Status rating 0-1
  4. Naïve to chemotherapy or hormonal treatments
  5. Radiologically confirmed and biopsy diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma of breast and prepared to be treated surgically
  6. Locally advance breast cancer of stage IIb-IIIc
  7. HER-2 negative confirmed by immunohistochemistry, Ki-67≥20%
  8. TEKT4 variation confirmed by DNA sequencing
  9. No concurrent malignancy (except controlled cervical carcinoma in situ or basal cell carcinoma of skin)
  10. Patients have measurable lesions (according to RECIST v1.1 criteria)
  11. Intention to cooperate with baseline puncture and neoadjuvant therapy
  12. No advanced metastasis or metastasis involving brain or liver
  13. Adequate bone marrow function, blood routine examination shows neutrophil count ≥ 1.5x109/L, hemoglobin level ≥ 100 g/L, Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L
  14. Adequate liver and kidney function, serum aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 60U/L, serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 times ULN, serum creatinine ≤110μmol/L, urea nitrogen ≤7.1mmol/L
  15. No coagulation abnormality
  16. Normal heart function, with normal ECG and LVEF ≥ 55%
  17. Women of childbearing age agree to take reliable contraceptive measures during clinical trials, and negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to administration
  18. No coagulation abnormality
  19. Sign the informed consent statement and voluntarily receive follow-ups, treatments, laboratory tests and other research procedures according to protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous regional or systemic treatment for breast cancer (include but not limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, other clinical trials)
  2. Inflammatory breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer or breast cancer already with distant metastasis
  3. Complicated with uncontrolled lung disease, severe infection, active peptic ulcer, blood clotting disorders, severe uncontrolled diabetes, connective tissue disorders or bone marrow suppression, and intolerance to neoadjuvant therapy or related treatment
  4. Peripheral neuropathy >1 degree caused by any reason
  5. History of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled or symptomatic angina, arrhythmias or history of myocardial infarction, refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg);
  6. Breast cancer during lactation or pregnancy
  7. Unwillingly to receive baseline puncture or neoadjuvant therapy
  8. Mental illness or incompliance to treatment caused by other reasons
  9. Known history of severe hypersusceptibility to any agents used in the treatment protocol
  10. Patients received major surgery or suffered from severe trauma within 2 months of first administration
  11. Currently enroll or recently used (30 days within enrollment) other agent under research or involved in other trial
  12. Known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  13. Other circumstances considered to be inappropriate to be enrolled by researchers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin
Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.
standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Experimental: Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin
Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.
Evaluate the efficiency and safety of vinorelbine plus epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
Time Frame: 3 years
pCR is defined as the absence of noninvasive tumor residuals in breast and axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 3 years
ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhimin Shao, MD.PhD., Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin

3
Subscribe