In Situ Remineralisation Response of Different Artificial Caries-like Enamel Lesions to Home-care and Professional Fluoride Treatments

December 22, 2015 updated by: Ana Carolina Magalhães, University of Sao Paulo

This study mainly compared the response of the artificial carious enamel lesions to remineralisation in situ. The tested in vitro demineralising protocols were: MC gel, PA gel, MHDP and Buffer solutions.

The lesions were then remineralised in an in situ model, with crossover and double blind design. Fifteen volunteers wore intra-oral appliances containing 2 bovine enamel samples of each demineralising protocol during 3 experimental phases (3 days each). The experimental phases/treatments were: Control (Placebo dentifrice, saliva effect only), Home-care (fluoride dentifrice, 1,100 ppm F, NaF), and Professional/Home-care (varnish- 22,600 ppm F and dentifrice- 1,100 ppm F, NaF).

During the 3-day phase, the appliance was only removed during the main meals (four times a day, maximum 1 h duration each, interval between meals 2-3 h). Immediately after the meals, before replacing the appliance in the mouth, the subjects were advised to perform oral hygiene using a soft end-rounded toothbrush (Colgate® 360º Sensitive Pro-Relief TM) and dentifrice (non-fluoridated from IceFresh, Bauru, SP, Brazil or fluoridated dentifrice from Crest Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the phase and dental floss (Sanifill, São Paulo, Brazil).

The remineralising treatment with dentifrices was done ex vivo, 1 min twice a day (after the first and last oral hygiene of the day) using slurry of the dentifrice (1:3 water, 1 drop of solution/specimen). Thereafter, the appliance was replaced in the mouth and the subjects were advised to rinse with 10 ml of water for 5 s and to expectorate. In respect to Professional/Home-care phase, the varnish (Duraphat, Colgate, SP, Brazil) was applied before the in situ study for 6h and then removed.

The enamel remineralization was quantified using transverse microradiography (% mineral recovery and lesion depth, TMR), surface and cross-sectional hardness. The data were submitted to statistical analysis (p<0.05).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a stimulated physiological salivary flow rate of >1 ml.min-1
  • a non-stimulated physiological salivary flow rate of >0.25 ml.min-1
  • good oral health (i.e. no cavities or significant gingivitis/periodontitis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • systemic illness
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • use of fixed or removable orthodontic appliances
  • use of fluoride mouthrinse or professional fluoride application in the last 2 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fluoride varnish and fluoride toothpaste
Application of fluoride varnish (Duraphat) at the begining of the study. Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days.
Placebo Comparator: placebo toothpaste
Application of placebo toothpaste twice a day for 3 days
Active Comparator: Fluoride toothpaste
Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The increase of mineral content (% mineral volume) using transverse microradiography
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
The increase of hardness (KHN or KgF/mm2) artificial caries lesions using surface and cross-sectional hardness
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Decrease of lesion depth (microns) of artificial caries lesions using transverse microradiography
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Application of fluoride varnish (22600 ppm F, Duraphat) at the begining of the study

Subscribe