A Study of CK-2127107 in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy

August 21, 2020 updated by: Cytokinetics

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose Study of CK-2127107 in Two Ascending Dose Cohorts of Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy

This study will evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of CK-2127107 (hereafter referred to as reldesemtiv) versus placebo on measures of skeletal muscle function or fatigability in patients with Type II, III, or IV spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

CY 5021 is a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple dose study of reldesemtiv in 2 sequential ascending dose cohorts of patients with SMA. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive reldesemtiv or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. Patients randomized to reldesemtiv in Cohort 1 will receive a dose of 150 mg twice daily and patients randomized to reldesemtiv in Cohort 2 will receive 450 mg twice daily. Within each cohort, randomization will be stratified by ambulatory status (ambulatory versus non ambulatory).

The primary objective of the study is to determine the PD effects of reldesemtiv on measures of pulmonary function, respiratory function, muscle strength, and motor function. Other PD measures include changes in the timed up and go (TUG) test, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and patient and investigator global assessments. Secondary objectives include the safety of multiple doses of reldesemtiv and an evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of reldesemtiv.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3B 6A8
        • Alberta Children's Hospital
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3V4
        • Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5
        • Children's Hospital - LHSC
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2B4
        • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California Irvine
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Pediatric Neuromuscular Clinic Stanford University
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • Connecticut
      • New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06053
        • Hospital for Special Care
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
        • Nemours Childrens Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Pediatric Clinical Research Unit
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • The University of Utah, Clinical Neurosciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF) for patients 18 years of age and older. For patients less than 18 years of age, parent(s)/legal guardian(s) of patients must provide written informed consent prior to participation in the study and informed assent will be obtained from minors at least 12 years of age when required by regulation.
  • Males or females with genetically confirmed diagnosis of SMA who are Type II, III or IV and at least 12 years of age
  • Ambulatory patients, once having achieved a standing position independently, must be able to complete at least one lap in the 6-minute walk test (at least 50 meters) within 6 minutes without assistance.
  • Non-ambulatory patients (defined as individuals who are effectively requiring a wheelchair for all mobility needs; they may be able to stand or walk short distances, but unable to walk 50 meters without assistance in 6 minutes). Non-ambulatory patients must be able to tolerate an upright sitting position, with support, continuously for 3 hours
  • Hammersmith (HFMS-E) score ≥ 10 and ≤ 54
  • Contracture of the elbow flexion and knee flexion ≤ 90 degrees
  • Pre-study clinical laboratory findings within the normal range or, if outside the normal range, deemed not clinically significant by the Investigator
  • Able to swallow an oral suspension and in the opinion of the Investigator, is expected to continue to be able to do so for the duration of the trial. Administration via a feeding tube is not allowed.
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) > 20% predicted
  • Male patients who have reached puberty must agree to do either of the following from Screening until 10 weeks after the last dose of the investigational product unless they have had a vasectomy and confirmed sperm count is zero:

    • Abstain from sexual intercourse, OR
    • If having heterosexual intercourse, must use a condom and their female partners who are of childbearing potential must use a highly effective contraception method*
  • Female patients who have had their first period will be considered of childbearing potential unless they are anatomically and physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant. If of childbearing potential, the female patients must:

    • Have a negative urine/serum pregnancy test at Screening AND
    • Abstain from heterosexual intercourse from Screening until 10 weeks after the last dose of investigational product OR
    • If having heterosexual intercourse, must use a highly effective contraception method* and require the male partners to use a condom from Screening until 10 weeks after the last dose of investigational product

      *Highly effective contraception methods include:

    • Established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception
    • Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS)
  • Male patients must agree to refrain from sperm donation from Screening until 10 weeks after the final study drug administration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant hypersensitivity, intolerance, or allergy to any drug compound, food, or other substance, unless approved by the Investigator
  • Hospitalization within 2 months of Screening
  • History of stomach or intestinal surgery or resection that would potentially alter absorption and/or excretion of orally administered drugs (appendectomy, hernia repair, and/or cholecystectomy will be allowed)
  • A clinically significant illness within 4 weeks of Screening
  • History of alcoholism or drug addiction within 2 years prior to Screening
  • History of smoking more than 10 cigarettes (or equivalent amount of tobacco) per day within 3 months prior to Screening
  • Patient has used a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor within 7 days prior to first dose of study drug or a strong CYP3A4 inducer within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug
  • Any other medical condition that would interfere with performance of testing including (but not limited to) significant joint pain or arthritis limiting mobility, and chronic neuromuscular pain sufficient to require ongoing analgesic medication
  • Participation by two people at the same time that are living in the same household
  • Participation in any other investigational study drug trial in which receipt of an investigational study drug occurred within 30 days or five half-lives of the other investigational study drug, whichever is greater, prior to Screening
  • An ALT or AST greater than 2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN) or has total bilirubin greater than the ULN at screening. These assessments may be repeated once at the investigator's discretion (within the screening window)
  • Currently taking nusinersen, or has taken it in the past, or plans to take it during the course the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients randomized to this treatment arm will receive a placebo suspension twice daily for 8 weeks.
Granules for oral suspension (placebo)
Experimental: Reldesemtiv 150 mg twice daily
Patient randomized to this treatment arm will receive reldesemtiv suspension at a dose of 150 mg, twice daily for 8 weeks.
Granules for oral suspension, 18.7% reldesemtiv
Other Names:
  • CK-2127107
Experimental: Reldesemtiv 450 mg twice daily
Patients randomized to this treatment arm will receive reldesemtiv suspension at a dose of 450 mg, twice daily for 8 weeks.
Granules for oral suspension, 56.0% reldesemtiv
Other Names:
  • CK-2127107

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
FVC was measured using a calibrated spirometer (in units of liters). Patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs).
baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
MIP was measured (in units of cm H20) using a calibrated spirometer with an inspiratory pressure valve attached. For the test, patients were asked to inhale as forcefully as possible, to their maximum pressure.
baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
MEP was measured (in units of cm H20) using a calibrated spirometer with an exspiratory pressure valve attached. For the test, patients were asked to maximally inhale then perform a forced exhalation with as forcefully as possible.
baseline and 8 weeks
Muscle Strength Mega-Score at Week 8
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks

Muscle strength of 3 muscle groups (elbow flexion, knee extension, and shoulder abduction) were measured bilaterally using a hand-held dynamometer. Muscle strength was measured twice for each body location; if the variability between the 2 measures was > 15%, a third measure was obtained.

The maximum muscle strength of the 2 measurements was identified and transformed as a percent change from baseline using the equation: ([postbaseline value - baseline value] / baseline value) × 100.

The mega-score was a composite score that averaged strength across the 3 muscle groups. It was calculated as the mean of the non-missing transformed muscle strength scores among the 3 muscle groups each measure bilaterally (totaling 6 body locations).

baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMS-E)
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
The HFMS-E evaluated the level of independent mobility and motor skills through assessment of 33 test-items, each scored from 0 (worse) to 2 (better). The total score was calculated as the sum of the scores among the 33 test items, and has a range from 0 to 66.
baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM)
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
The RULM assessed motor function in the upper limbs (specifically shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand function) that related to activities of everyday life. The RULM consisted of 20 items, 1 of which was scored on a 7-point scale (from 0 to 6), 18 were scored on a 3-point scale (from 0 to 2), and 1 was scored on a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The total score was the sum of each response and could range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 43 points. Higher scores reflected better motor function.
baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the TUG Test
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
The TUG test measured the time (in seconds) it took for a patient to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down.
baseline and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 6MWT
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
The 6MWT measured the distance (in meters) a patient walked in 6 minutes.
baseline and 8 weeks
Patient Global Assessment at the End of Week 8
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Patients assessed whether they felt the same, better, or worse than prior to dosing on Day 1.
8 weeks
Investigator Global Assessment at the End of Week 8
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Investigator assessed whether patient appeared the same, better, or worse than prior to dosing on Day 1.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reldesemtiv Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: End of Week 8
Determined by evaluation of reldesemtiv plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 1, 3, and 6 hours following dosing
End of Week 8
Reldesemtiv Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12)
Time Frame: End of Week 8
Determined by evaluation of reldesemtiv plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 1, 3, and 6 hours following dosing
End of Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: MD, Cytokinetics, Cytokinetics, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe