SGLT2 Inhibitor Versus Sulfonylurea on Type 2 Diabetes With NAFLD

June 30, 2021 updated by: Toshinari Takamura, MD, PhD, Kanazawa University

Pleiotropic Effects and Safety of Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitor Versus Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver

The clinicopathological analyses revealed that reduction in HbA1c and use of insulin independently contribute to the reduction in liver fibrosis scores during the histological course of NAFLD development. These findings led us to hypothesize that glycemic control and insulin ameliorate or protect against the histological progression of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin and sulfonylurea glimepiride, which lower glucose levels similarly with reduction and elevation in circulating insulin levels, respectively, in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes for 48 weeks by examining liver histology, as well as hepatic enzymes, metabolic markers, and hepatic gene expression profiles.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), ranging from simple fatty liver to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is a liver phenotype of metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. NAFLD and type 2 diabetes share epidemiological and pathophysiological features. Specifically, hyperglycemia is closely associated with liver fibrosis, which is associated with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and prognosis in patients with NASH.

To date, some anti-diabetic agents have been tested in patients with NAFLD. The guidelines in the Asian Pacific, European, and American association recommended the administration of PPAR gamma agonist (pioglitazone) and glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1RA) for the treatment of diabetes with NAFLD/NASH. However, there are concerns about adverse effects such as weight gain, edema, fractures, and carcinogenesis in pioglitazone or gastrointestinal adverse effects and medication burden as an injection in GLP1 RA. In addition, because all of these anti-diabetic agents significantly reduced glycemic levels compared with placebo, liver histological improvement may be theoretically attributable to glucose reduction itself.

Both sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and sulfonylureas are chosen as the second-line therapy when glycemic control cannot be achieved with metformin or as the first-line therapy when metformin is contraindicated or not tolerated. In animal models of NAFLD/NASH, SGLT2 inhibitors protect against steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. Previous clinical trials have demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors exert protective effects on liver enzymes and liver steatosis in patients with NAFLD/NASH. However, these studies lack a control group or histological examination, which precludes meaningful conclusions since the natural course of the disease or tight glycemic control may ameliorate liver histology in some patients with NAFLD. Sulfonylureas are still reliable and potent antidiabetic agents in insulinopenic patients with type 2 diabetes and therefore are used as the second-line therapy, especially when the cost is a significant issue. Besides, sulfonylureas reduce glucose and elevate weight, which may render positive and negative effects, respectively, on liver pathology in NAFLD/NASH. In the phase 3 trial, canagliflozin was non-inferior to glimepiride for reduction of HbA1c at 52 weeks. However, the differences between SGLT2 inhibitors and sulfonylureas on NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes under similar glucose reduction remain uncertain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ishikawa
      • Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan, 920-8640
        • Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The trial entry criteria are based on:

  1. A diagnosis of "definite" NAFLD on liver biopsy obtained within 3 months of screening.
  2. ≥20 years of age at the time of the initial screening.
  3. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of screening need to have glycemic control (HbA1c of ≥7%) and have been managed by either diet and/or a stable dose of hypoglycemic agents for at least 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Hepatic virus infections (hepatitis B and C, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus), autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis, hemochromatosis, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency, Wilson's disease, history of parenteral nutrition.
  2. Use of agents known to induce steatosis (e.g., valproate, amiodarone, or vitamin E)
  3. Hepatic injury caused by substance abuse.
  4. Current consumption of more than 20 g of alcohol daily.
  5. Hepatic decompensation, such as hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, variceal bleeding
  6. Elevated serum bilirubin level of more than two-fold the upper normal limit.
  7. Tofogliflozin or glimepiride hypersensitivity or contraindications.
  8. History of type 1 diabetes.
  9. History of ketoacidosis.
  10. History of symptoms of severe hypoglycemia.
  11. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor including tofogliflozin within 4 weeks of screening.
  12. Treatment with glinide and sulfonylurea use within 4 weeks of screening.
  13. Concomitant corticosteroid therapy uses within 4 weeks of screening.
  14. Poorly controlled unstable diabetes (ketoacidosis or an increase in HbA1c of >3% in the 12 weeks before screening).
  15. Poorly controlled hypertension or systolic blood pressure of >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >100 mmHg.
  16. Artificial dialysis or moderate renal dysfunction.
  17. Poorly controlled dyslipidemia.
  18. Presence of a severe health problem, not being suitable for the study.
  19. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  20. Inability to participate in the study (including psychiatric and psychosocial problems), as assessed by the investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SGLT2 inhibitor
N=20 SGLT2 inhibitor dosage (Tofogliflozin): a dose of 20mg once daily for 48 weeks.
The group receiving Tofogliflozin (at a dose of 20mg once daily) for 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • DEBERZA
Active Comparator: Sulfonylurea
N=20 Sulfonylurea (Glimepiride): an initial dose of 0.5 mg once daily for 48 weeks.
Sulfonylurea dosage (Glimepiride): dosing from 0.5 mg for initial 4 weeks. Then, if there is no adverse effect or no improvement of glucose metabolism, glimepiride is escalated to 6 mg once daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The improvement in histologic features of NAFLD
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in liver enzymes
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in body composition
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose level and glucose metabolism assessed with arginine tolerance test
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in organ-specific insulin sensitivity and glucagon response during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp study
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in lipid profile
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in renal function and electrolyte balances
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in oxidative stress
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in cytokine (TNF-alpha, leptin, adiponectin) levels
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in hepatokine (Selenoprotein P, LECT2) levels
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in organ-specific fat accumulation
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in oxidative and non-oxidative glucose disposal
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in respiratory quotients
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in energy expenditure
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Change from baseline in autonomic nerve function.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in minerals and bone metabolism
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in endothelial functions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in fatty acids profiles
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Factors associated with the changes in autonomic nerve function, organ-specific fat accumulation, and glucagon response.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in gene expression profiles in the liver and blood cells
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes from baseline in microRNAs and exosome contents
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Epigenomic changes from baseline in genes of the liver and blood cells
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Toshinari Takamura, MD,PhD, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences,

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The datasets are not readily available because several studies are ongoing using the datasets in the present study. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the correspondence author. We will open raw data with the appropriate institutional ethics committee's prior approval.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Tofogliflozin

3
Subscribe