Combination Corticosteroids+5-aminosalicylic Acids Compared to Corticosteroids Alone (for Ulcerative Colitis). (COMBOMESA)

Combination Corticosteroids+5-aminosalicylic Acids Compared to Corticosteroids Alone in the Treatment of Moderate-severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Protocol of a Multi-center Prospective Randomized Investigator Blinded Trial.

The role of steroids in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) exacerbation is well established and recommended by professional societies. Similarly, 5-aminosalycilates (5-ASA) agents in the form of mesalamine/mesalzine are well established proven therapy in mild-moderate UC, and the combination of oral 5-ASA with topical (per-rectal enema) 5-ASA was shown to be superior to oral 5ASA alone in patients with mild moderate UC. Thus, in most cases, when a patient with UC experiences a flare while taking 5-ASA therapy, treatment is usually optimized by maximizing the oral dose to 4gr/day and adding topical therapy until the flare is controlled. If this is unhelpful, or if the flare is severe to begin with, corticosteroids are usually prescribed. However, there are very scarce data comparing steroids versus 5-ASA in the treatment of severe UC exacerbation.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of steroids alone vs. combination of steroids + 5-ASA in the treatment of moderate-severe UC exacerbation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The role of steroids in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) exacerbation is well established and recommended by professional societies. This recommendation is based on pivotal studies carried 50-60 years ago, by Truelove &Witts. Similarly, 5-aminosalycilates (5-ASA) agents in the form of mesalamine/mesalzine are well established proven therapy in mild-moderate UC, and the combination of oral 5-ASA with topical (per-rectal enema) 5-ASA was shown to be superior to oral 5ASA alone in patients with mild moderate UC. Thus, in most cases, when a patient with UC experiences a flare while taking 5-ASA therapy, treatment is usually optimized by maximizing the oral dose to 4gr/day and adding topical therapy until the flare is controlled. If this is unhelpful, or if the flare is severe to begin with, corticosteroids are usually prescribed. However, there are very scarce data comparing steroids versus 5-ASA in the treatment of severe UC exacerbation. In 1962 truelove et al compared topical and systemic corticosteroid therapy with sulphasalazine, and found steroids to be superior to sulfasalazine. Importantly, there are no data investigating whether the addition and/or continuation of 5-ASA agents as combination therapy with systemic corticosteroids is superior to corticosteroids alone in patients with moderate-severe active UC. This knowledge gap is pronounced in patients admitted to the hospital for intravenous corticosteroid treatment with moderate severe UC flare, in whom it is currently unknown if the addition of 5-ASA (Oral and/or topical) to corticosteroids will confer additional benefit and improve patients outcomes. Thus, in practical terms, the decision whether to stop or continue 5-ASA treatment or whether to add 5-ASA to steroids in the treatment of moderate-severe UC exacerbation is taken on an arbitrary basis. This is important shortcoming and knowledge gap in current medicine, as patients admitted with moderate-severe UC flare who do not respond to corticosteroids and require salvage therapy with infliximab, cyclosporine, or even urgent colectomy. This makes it prudent to explore any avenue for possible improvement of response to corticosteroids in this setting, for instance by addition of 5ASA.

The aim of this study is: To compare the efficacy of steroids alone vs. combination of steroids + 5-ASA in the treatment of moderate- severe UC exacerbation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint Etienne, France, 42100
        • CHU Saint Etienne
      • Heraklion, Greece
        • Department of Gastroenterology Venizeleio General Hospital, Leoforos Knosou
    • Ramat-Gan
      • Tel HaShomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
        • Sheba Medical Center
      • Rome, Italy
        • Università di Roma Sapienza
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Institute of Gastroenterology and Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • Zvezdara University Clinical Center, Gastroenterology Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • UC known and diagnosed by established clinical-endoscopic and histological criteria or newly-diagnosed UC, based on clinical and endoscopic findings, and about to start treatment with corticosteroids.
  • Current hospitalization with Severe UC exacerbation as defined by a Lichtiger score of >10
  • Age >18
  • Has not been on oral systemic corticosteroids more than 14 days prior to hospitalization
  • If taking a thiopurine, the dose need to be stable for the last 2 months before admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Allergy / unable to take prednisone / hydrocortisone/ 5-ASA.
  • Active infection - either enteric or elsewhere
  • Severe renal, liver or cardio respiratory comorbidity
  • Toxic megacolon, or clinical features suggestive of a need for imminent colectomy
  • Treatment with an anti-TNF within the prior 3 months
  • Prior treatment with cyclosporine or tacrolimus within the prior 3 months
  • Alcohol dependency
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Participating in other clinical trial within the 2 months prior to admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5-ASA group
Patients will receive corticosteroids with optimized 5-ASA.
5ASA treatment (oral 5ASA will be given to all patients in this arm, in addition to topical 5ASA in patients who tolerate it).
Other Names:
  • 5-aminosalicylates
Corticosteroids will be given to all patients.
Other Names:
  • Usual care
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients will receive corticosteroids alone.
Corticosteroids will be given to all patients.
Other Names:
  • Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients who respond to the treatment by day 7.
Time Frame: Day 7
The primary endpoint will be the percentage of patients who respond to the treatment by day 7. Response will be defined by a drop of >3 points in the lichtiger score and an absolute score <10 on the two prior consecutive days without the need for rescue medications or surgery. In patients who improve and are discharged prior to day 7, the lichtiger score will be calculated based on the two last days of hospitalization, provided that at least 3 days of study medications were dispensed. Patients discharged before 3 days of study medications have been administered will be considered in-eligible and will be dropped out of the analyses.
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ROBLIN Xavier, MD, CHU Saint Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on 5-ASA

3
Subscribe