- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02700451
Post-op Acetaminophen vs NSAID Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post-operative Acetaminophen Versus Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes
Patients undergoing spine surgery often have considerable pain post-operatively and frequently require opioid medication (Percocet, Norco, oxycodone, morphine, etc.) to control their pain postoperatively. The widespread use of opioids, however, is associated with a number of side effects. These include: sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, constipation, dizziness and itching amongst others. Some investigators have suggested that anti-inflammatory medications (the same class of medicines as advil, ibuprofen, etc.) and acetaminophen (Tylenol) can reduce the total dose of opioid required postoperatively and, as a result, lower opioid-related side effects.
The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis and determine if postoperative anti-inflammatory medications and postoperative acetaminophen can reduce the amount of opioid required to control pain following surgery. A secondary goal of this study is to examine if the change in pain medication will lead to decreased overall pain levels, decreased opioid-related side effects and improved function [quicker ambulation with physical therapy (PT), earlier return to work, etc.].
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Given the potential for non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen to decrease opioid requirements following spine surgery, the investigators propose a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (Group A) or IV ketorolac (Group K) versus placebo (Group P). The impact of treatment on perioperative opioid use, opioid-related complications, functional outcomes and rates of pseudarthrosis following 1 or 2 level lumbar fusion surgery will be measured in each group. The specific aims of this study are as follows:
- Specific Aim 1: Determine the impact of IV ketorolac or IV acetaminophen use on immediate postoperative opioid requirements, postoperative pain levels and opiate related symptoms using the Opiate-Related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS)
- Specific Aim 2: Determine the impact of IV ketorolac or IV acetaminophen use on functional outcomes defined by return to work, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Veterans Rand-12 (VR-12) Health Survey
The primary outcome is to determine the total postoperative opioid dose (in oral morphine equivalents) in each group. The investigators hypothesize that patients in Group A and Group K will have lower total opioid use, suffer from fewer opiate related symptoms and have similar rates of pseudarthrosis to patients in Group P. The investigators hypothesize that patients in Group A and Group K will have a quicker return to work and improved early functional outcomes although they acknowledge that long term functional outcomes may be the same for all groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-75
- Require 1 or 2 level lumbar spinal fusion through posterior or lateral approach
- No history of long term opioid use (daily or almost daily opioid use > 2 weeks) and not on opiates at time of presentation to clinic
Exclusion Criteria:
- Documented allergy to NSAIDs or Acetaminophen
- History of: Peptic Ulcer Disease, Congestive heart failure, Chronic liver disease, Elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/ aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 1.5 times control, Bleeding disorder, Renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL), Glucocorticoid use within 1 month of surgery
- Current smokers (quite date < 30 days ago)
- Revision for pseudarthrosis
- Patients who are unable to physically or mentally provide consent to the study procedures.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Intravenous (IV) Placebo
IV Placebo arm
|
Intravenous Normal Saline every 6 hours for 48 hours in addition to patient-controlled analgesia and oral opioids as needed.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: IV Ketorolac
IV Ketorolac arm
|
Age 18-64: Intravenous Ketorolac 30 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours for 48 hours in addition to patient-controlled analgesia and oral opioids as needed. Age 65-75: Intravenous Ketorolac 15 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours for 48 hours in addition to patient-controlled analgesia and oral opioids as needed.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: IV Acetaminophen
IV Acetaminophen arm
|
Intravenous Acetaminophen 1000mg every 6 hours for 48 hours in addition to patient-controlled analgesia and oral opioids as needed.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Perioperative Opioid Use
Time Frame: Hospital stay (2-4 days)
|
Measure the impact of treatment on total opioid use during the hospital stay
|
Hospital stay (2-4 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Opioid Use at 4-6 Weeks
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
|
Track opioid use after discharge for the first 4-6 weeks
|
4-6 weeks
|
Opioid Use at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Track opioid use after discharge for the first 3 months; assess for continued opioid use
|
3 months
|
Opioid Use at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Track opioid use after discharge for the first 1 year; assess for continued opioid use
|
1 year
|
Opioid Use at 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Track total opioid use after discharge for the first 2 years; assess for continued opioid use
|
2 years
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1 days and 3 days
|
Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level
|
1 days and 3 days
|
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 1 day and 3 days
|
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a self-administered questionnaire for chronic pain conditions.
The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score.
The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity.
Each item is rated from 0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad as you can imagine, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40.
The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference.
The seven sub-items are rated from 0, does not interfere, to 10, completely interferes, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70.
The first item, pain drawing diagrams (painful and most painful areas) and the items on pain relief treatment or medication (list of the treatments and amount of relief) do not contribute to the scoring.
|
1 day and 3 days
|
Opioid Related Side Effects
Time Frame: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Ileus, nausea/vomiting, first bowel movement, first flatus, treated pruritis will be identified and recorded
|
Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Perioperative Complications - Drain Output
Time Frame: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Complications such as: excessive drain output, elevation in creatinine, and the need for transfusions will be identified and recorded
|
Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Perioperative Complications - Transfusion Rate
Time Frame: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Complications such as: excessive drain output, elevation in creatinine, and the need for transfusions will be identified and recorded
|
Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Days to Walk 50 ft With PT
Time Frame: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Days needed to be able to walk 50ft with PT
|
Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Will record date of discharge
|
Hospital Stay (1-4 days)
|
Veterans Rand - 12
Time Frame: pre-operative
|
The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a "Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score}" and a "Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}". Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome. This score range apply to both PCS and MCS. |
pre-operative
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: pre-operative
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting.
It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living.
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.
If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability.
|
pre-operative
|
Veterans Rand - 12
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
|
The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a "Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score}" and a "Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}". Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome. This score range apply to both PCS and MCS. |
3 month follow up
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting.
It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living.
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.
If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability.
|
3 month follow up
|
Return to Work
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
|
Record return to work
|
3 month follow up
|
Veterans Rand - 12
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a "Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score}" and a "Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}". Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome. This score range apply to both PCS and MCS. |
1 year follow up
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting.
It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living.
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.
If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability.
|
1 year follow up
|
Return to Work
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
Record return to work
|
1 year follow up
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level
|
1 year follow up
|
Veterans Rand - 12
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
|
The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health.. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a "Physical Health Summary Measure {PCS-physical component score}" and a "Mental Health Summary Measure {MCS-mental component score}". Score range is 0 to 100, higher score denotes a better outcome. This score range apply to both PCS and MCS. |
2 year follow up
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting.
It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living.
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.
If a patient marks more than one statement in a question, the highest scoring statement is recorded as a true indication of disability.
|
2 year follow up
|
Return to Work
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
|
Record return to work
|
2 year follow up
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
|
Validated pain scale; will be completed by patient Minimum Score: 0 & Maximum score 100 A lower score is representative of a low pain level
|
2 year follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Harvinder Sandhu, MD, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
- Study Director: Catherine Himo Gang, Research Manager for Spine Research
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Arthritis
- Spinal Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Spondylarthritis
- Spondylitis
- Osteoarthritis
- Spinal Stenosis
- Spondylosis
- Osteoarthritis, Spine
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
- Antipyretics
- Ketorolac
- Acetaminophen
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-333
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis
-
RTI SurgicalCompletedSpinal Disease | Spinal Instability | Spinal Stenosis Occipito-Atlanto-Axial | Spinal Stenosis Cervical | Spinal Stenosis Cervicothoracic RegionUnited States
-
Sutherland Medical CenterActive, not recruitingSpinal Stenosis Lumbar | Spinal Canal StenosisPoland
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Thoracic Spinal StenosisUnited States
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital BaselCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
-
Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency CarePirogov National Medical Surgical Center; Federal State Budgetary Institution... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Spinal Stenosis | Spinal FusionRussian Federation
-
Region ZealandRegion SyddanmarkRecruiting
-
Tang-Du HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal StenosisTurkey
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States