Intrathecal Baclofen (ITB) Bolus on Neuropathic Pain (NP). Preliminary Study. (ITB)

August 6, 2019 updated by: Hatice Kumru, Institut Guttmann

Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen (ITB) Bolus on Neuropathic Pain (NP) in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patients. Preliminary Study.

Hypothesis:

ITB bolus can have antinociceptive effect on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury patients, which could depend on the subtype of pain, or on the lesion level, cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury.

Objective:

To study the effect of intrathecal baclofen bolus on neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury at cervico-dorsal level.

Primary Endpoint:

Effect of intrathecal baclofen bolus in neuropathic pain (measured using the Neuropathic Pain Inventory Scale, the Brief Pain Inventory and the Numerical Rating Scale) in spinal cord injury at cervico-dorsal level.

Secondary Endpoints:

  1. Spasticity and spasms (measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale and Penn Spasm Frequency Scale).
  2. Neurophysiological examination (warm perception threshold, heat pain perception threshold, evoked pain perception and contact heat evoked potentials).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will be a randomized, double-blind (patients and who will realize the clinical and neurophysiologic evaluation), placebo-controlled trial. We will recruit 10-12 patients with SCI with complete or incomplete lesion at cervical or thoracic level to be randomly distributed in two study groups: ITB bolus group and a placebo group.

In 6-8 months, we will administer an intrathecal baclofen bolus of 50 µg (1ml) in 5-6 SCI patients or 1ml of physiologic serum subcutaneously in the other 5-6 SCI patients.

Before the intrathecal baclofen or placebo bolus is administered, patients will be evaluated for neuropathic pain, using the Neuropathic Pain Inventory Scale, Brief Pain Inventory and Numerical Rating Scale. Spasticity and spasms will also be measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale, the Visual Analogue Scale and the Penn Spasm. After that, patients will also undergo, early in the morning when the intrathecal baclofen or placebo bolus will be administered, a neurophysiology assessment (warm perception threshold, heat pain perception threshold, evoked pain perception and contact heat evoked potentials).

After the neurophysiological evaluation, patients will receive an intrathecal baclofen bolus of 50 µg or placebo (randomization). After the intrathecal baclofen or placebo injection, a clinical and neurophysiological examination, of neuropathic pain and spasticity and spasms, will be repeated at 1, 2 and 4 hours after the bolus administration. Moreover, Kumru et al. (2013) reported that the 50 µg intrathecal baclofen bolus reduced the pain perception threshold and evoked acute pain perception in patients with SCI.

During all evaluation period, the patients continue with their analgesic, antispastic and/or any other stable medication.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Institut Guttmann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-70 years and at least one year since the spinal cord injury.
  • Aetiology: stable SCI from traumatic or medical origin.
  • Patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain and with spinal cord injury, both complete and incomplete, at the cervico-thoracic level.
  • Severity of pain equal or greater than 4 in the Numerical Rating Scale.
  • With spasticity (MAS>=).
  • Stable analgesic, antispastic and any other medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not give patient inform consent.
  • Contraindication for baclofen or intrathecal injection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: intrathecal baclofen bolus
In ITB bolus group: An intrathecal baclofen bolus injection of 50 µg (1ml) will be injected at L3/L4 level. A 50 µg.
An intrathecal baclofen bolus injection of 50 µg (1ml) will be injected at L3/L4 level.
Other Names:
  • ITB bolus
Placebo Comparator: placebo
In the placebo group: 1 ml of physiological saline (isotonic saline) will be injected subcutaneously at L3/L4 level simulating
1 ml of physiological saline (isotonic saline) will be injected subcutaneously at L3/L4 level simulating
Other Names:
  • physiological saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropathic Pain Inventory Scale (NPIS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in neuropathic pain at 4hours
a self-questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate the different symptoms of neuropathic pain and includes 10 descriptors that allow discrimination and quantification of five distinct clinically relevant dimensions of neuropathic pain syndromes and that are sensitive to treatment
Change from baseline in neuropathic pain at 4hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in spasticity at 1, 2 and 4hours
is to measure spasticity in patients who have lesions of the central nervous system or neurological disorders.
Change from baseline in spasticity at 1, 2 and 4hours
Modified Penn Spasm Frequency Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline in spasticity at 4hours
2 component self-report measure of the frequency of reported muscle spasms which is commonly used to quantify spasticity.
Change from baseline in spasticity at 4hours
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for spasticity
Time Frame: Change from baseline in spasticity at 4 hours
Consists 10cm line for patient self-reporting of spasticity last 24hours
Change from baseline in spasticity at 4 hours
warm and heat pain perception threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline in warm and pain perception at 4hours
it is quantitative sensory perception test for warm perception threshold and heat pain perception threshold
Change from baseline in warm and pain perception at 4hours
evoked pain perception
Time Frame: Change from baseline in evoked acute pain perception at 4hours
it is quantitative sensory perception test for acute induced pain perception measurement
Change from baseline in evoked acute pain perception at 4hours
contact heat evoked potentials.
Time Frame: Change from baseline in evoked potential with heat pain at 4hours
It is an evoked potential induced with heat painful stimulus
Change from baseline in evoked potential with heat pain at 4hours
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in pain at 4hours
The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function.
Change from baseline in pain at 4hours
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for neuropathic pain
Time Frame: Change from baseline in pain at 4hours
Varies between 0-10 point (no pain- more severe pain) for patient self-reporting of pain for actual pain
Change from baseline in pain at 4hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hatice Kumru, MD PhD, Neurologist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Intrathecal baclofen bolus

3
Subscribe