Oblique Subcostal Tap Block Efficacy in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

March 8, 2016 updated by: Breazu Caius Mihai, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Oblique Subcostal Transverses Abdominal Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy although a minimally invasive procedure, may be accompanied by considerable pain after surgery. More recently transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was extensively studied as a potential analgesic maneuver after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The subcostal approach (OSTAP block) is a variation on the TAP block that produces reliable supraumbilical analgesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive widespread surgical procedure, with postoperative lower pain scores and quick recovery of the patient. However some of patients may complain of considerable pain after surgery . There are several approaches to postoperative pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as patient-controlled analgesia with opioids (IV-PCA), neuraxial blocks, intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetics, wound infiltration, each being more or less effective, with specific side effects.

The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP-Block) is a regional analgesia technique that comes as an alternative to "classical" procedures of postoperative analgesia. Described by Rafi and McDonnell et al. this technique has undergone some changes over times, which increased its efficiency. Thus, Hebbard et al. described ultrasound subcostal oblique approach (OSTAP) of the block allowing analgesia in both the upper and lower abdomen, with a lower rate of complications due to the direct ultrasound visualization. Different studies confirmed the analgesic efficacy of this technique and the postoperative opioid sparing effect after laparoscopic cholecystectomy .

Traditionally, the transversus abdominis plane block is achieved with classical amino-amides local anesthetics, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine being the most commonly used .

Based on the local anesthetic properties of pethidine, a synthetic opioid, our study aimed to evaluate prospectively the analgesic efficacy of pethidine in achieving transversus abdominis plane block by ultrasound oblique subcostal approach in patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Cluj
      • Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania, 400162
        • Recruiting
        • Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof.dr.Octavian Fodor"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II
  • Age over 18years old
  • patients scheduled elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open cholecystectomy - excluded due to increased levels of pain in open procedures
  • Renal dysfunction (Serum Cr > 1.2) - excluded due to potential altered metabolism of anesthetic and pain medications
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulation - increased risk of bleeding from nerve block injection
  • Allergy or contraindication to any of the study medications or anesthetic agents
  • Chronic opioid analgesic use at home - excluded due to potential difficulty in assessing pain caused by the procedure alone
  • Patient inability to properly describe postoperative pain to investigators (language barrier, dementia, delirium, psychiatric disorder)
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Patient or surgeon refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oblique subcostal tap block with normal sterile saline ,20 ml, bilateral, single shot,24h
Tap Block performed with normal sterile saline 20 ml on the right side and 20 ml on the left side
Other Names:
  • Tap Block Placebo
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine
Oblique subcostal tap block with bupivacaine 0,25% ,20 ml, bilateral, single shot,24h
Tap Block performed with Bupivacaine 0,25% 20 ml on the right side and 20 ml on the left side.
Other Names:
  • Tap Block Bupivacaine
Active Comparator: Pethidine
Oblique subcostal tap block with pethidine 1% ,10 ml,bilateral,single shot,24h
Tap Block performed with pethidine 1% 10 ml on the right side and 10 ml on the left side
Other Names:
  • Tap Block Pethidine
Active Comparator: Pethidine Local Infiltration (L.I.)
Local infiltration of pethidine 1% at trocar insertion sites, 5ml /site, 24h compared with Tap Block with pethidine 1%
Local infiltration of port sites (trocar insertion sites) with pethidine 1% 5ml each port (trocar site) ,4 ports total 20 ml pethidine 1%
Other Names:
  • Pethidine Local Infiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores
Time Frame: Recorded 2 hours postoperative
This outcome is measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS, from 0 to 10) at 2 hours postoperative, while the patient is in his bed. This outcome is recorded in and compared between all four groups.
Recorded 2 hours postoperative
Pain Scores
Time Frame: Recorded 6 hours postoperative
This outcome is measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS, from 0 to 10) at 6 hours postoperative, while the patient is in his bed. This outcome is recorded in and compared between all four groups.
Recorded 6 hours postoperative
Pain Scores
Time Frame: Recorded 12 hours postoperative
This outcome is measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS, from 0 to 10) at 12 hours postoperative, while the patient is in his bed. This outcome is recorded in and compared between all four groups.
Recorded 12 hours postoperative
Pain Scores
Time Frame: Recorded 24 hours postoperative
This outcome is measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS, from 0 to 10) at 24 hours postoperative, while the patient is in his bed. This outcome is recorded in and compared between all four groups.
Recorded 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: 0-4 hours
Recording total amount of intraoperative fentanyl consumption
0-4 hours
Time to first opioid administration in Post Anesthetic Care Unit
Time Frame: 0-4 hours postoperative
Recording time to first opioid administration in post aesthetic care unit
0-4 hours postoperative
Cumulative opioid consumption
Time Frame: Recorded in the first 24 hours perioperative period
Recording total amount of opioids used in postoperative period
Recorded in the first 24 hours perioperative period
Side effects
Time Frame: Recorded in the first 24 hours postoperative
nausea, vomiting, pruritus and sedation on a 4 point scale as none, mild, moderate and severe
Recorded in the first 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Daniela Ionescu, MD, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu" Cluj-Napoca,Romania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe