Culturally Congruent HIV Risk Reduction App for Young Women, an Acceptability & Pilot Evaluation

Smartphone applications and mobile technologies offer users the potential to access critical information (e.g., proper condom use, directions to testing sites, and other sexual and reproductive health services) when it is needed most. Relevant findings will identify areas where existing interventions may be leveraged and adapted to work among young women of color in an urban setting and their networks. As SRH smartphone apps continue to proliferate, this study will expand researchers', developers', and health educators' limited knowledge about the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a sexual health educational app tailored with and for young Black and Latino women, aged 18-25 in NYC, including whether this app acts as a gateway to sexual health educators, clinical and other service providers. If proven effective, findings from this study will identify areas where existing interventions may be leveraged and adapted to work among a YBLW and their networks, and potentially adapted for other high needs communities.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

New HIV, Chlamydia and Gonorrhea infections are highest among young Black women and Latinas aged 13 to 29 years old compared to White women, which negatively impacts other sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Given that young women have a substantial need for SRH services and a high smartphone ownership, unique opportunities to utilize mobile apps(applications) to decrease HIV risk behaviors may exist.

A tailored, culturally congruent, smartphone app co-developed with and for young Black and Latino women (18 to 25 years old) not yet publicly available offers a unique opportunity to conduct a feasibility, acceptability, and pilot RCT. Using this app, this pilot that will: a) assess feasibility of the sampling, consent, recruitment and retention techniques; b) collect acceptability and usability data and cultural congruence on the app; a and c) collect pilot data to test differences between intervention and control groups on the preliminary estimates of app effectiveness to inform a potential larger-scale study. The investigators propose YBLW between 18 and 25 years old in NYC will use a mobile-based health education app to access SRH education information. Additionally, those who use the tailored SRH app will have more self-reported connection to SRH services, better knowledge of SRH education domains, and how to link to clinical services (e.g., PREP, PEP, EC, birth control, HIV, STD, and pregnancy testing), compared to the control group. Analysis for the first aim will employ process measures and the second and third aims are mixed-methods aims.

Analysis will compare differences between the 2-arms and indiscernible differences and culturally tailored usability will be explored via focus groups and web analytics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10027
        • CUNY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women between 18 and 25 years old;
  • self-identify as either Black and/or Latina;
  • own a smartphone (iOS or android);
  • live in NYC;
  • report vaginal or anal intercourse in their lifetime;
  • report unprotected intercourse in their lifetime;
  • healthy (not controls) adults. There will be estimated total 110 of said subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being married or partnered for more than one year,
  • report only being sexually active with women,
  • pregnant or have children 2 years old or younger,
  • HIV+ status,
  • men,
  • individuals under 18 and over 25,
  • live in a place other than New York City,
  • formal training as a sexual peer health educator (beyond a high school health class) or
  • unable to read English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GURHL Code Smartphone application
Experimental arm will receive the 'Understanding Reproductive Health for Ladeez (GURHL) Code 'app' (application) for their smartphone with sexual health information. The intervention is embedded in the smart phone application. This includes sexual and reproductive health knowledge, plus access to a National Planned Parenthood health educator, and directions to other nearby clinics. Participants will be assessed using A-CASI at 3 months after enrollment.
Understanding Reproductive Health for Ladeez (GURHL) Code is an acceptability study to test a web-based application designed with and for young women of color 18 to 25 years old.
No Intervention: Control

The control arm will receive usual care. That is, they will receive a web-based flyer. This flyer will include a list of clinics and other trusted available resources, but without hyperlinks.

Participants will be assessed using A-CASI at 3 months after enrollment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preliminary Efficacy1 Improvement in Sexual Health Knowledge Condom Use
Time Frame: 3 months
Effectiveness of the app based on reported knowledge of where to get condoms and how to use properly.
3 months
Preliminary Efficacy 2 Improvement in Sexual Health Knowledge Sexual and Reproductive Health Services
Time Frame: 3 months
Effectiveness of the app based on reported knowledge of what sexual and reproductive health services exist and where to access them
3 months
Preliminary Efficacy 2 Improvement in Sexual Health Knowledge HIV and STD
Time Frame: 3 months
Effectiveness of the app based on reported knowledge of what behaviors increase the risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases
3 months
Preliminary Efficacy 3 Improvement in Sexual Health Knowledge Connection to Services
Time Frame: 3 months
Effectiveness of the app based on reported knowledge of connection to sexual and reproductive health clinical services, based on whether women communicated with a reproductive health educator and whether she sought sexual and reproductive health services in person.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability 1 Number of Times Used
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the number of times the app is opened
3 months
Usability 2 Actions Taken
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the actions users take during sessions (each action coded as positive regardless of which one, including other links clicked on, audio listened to or video links clicked on)
3 months
Usability 3 Duration
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the duration of page visits
3 months
Usability 4A App performance
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the number of technical errors encountered by users.
3 months
Usability 4B Ease of App usage
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the ease of usage and if users liked and understood the contents
3 months
Usability 5 Facilitators and Barriers
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by user reports of facilitators and barriers to usage.
3 months
Usability 6 User Friendliness
Time Frame: 3 months
The usability of the app will be determined by the users' assessment of usefulness, trustworthiness and usability
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Denis Nash, PhD, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 381039

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The data collected and used ofr this will not be made publicly available.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Understanding Reproductive Health for Ladeez (GURHL) Code

Subscribe