- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06297070
Lifestyle Care for Fertility Outcome Evaluation (PROWESS)
Promoting ReprOductive WellbEing Through Shared Medical Appointments and Health Coaching Sessions
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This outcome evaluation will examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Whole Health Lifestyle Care for Reproductive Well-being Pilot Program ("Lifestyle Care for Fertility" or LCF) and collection of health behavior and patient-reported outcomes. Secondarily, it will also examine the longitudinal changes in health behaviors and patient-reported outcomes of participants in the Lifestyle Care for Fertility program
The Lifestyle Care for Fertility program serves women who have a fertility-related diagnosis. The program consists of an individual Integrative Health and Medicine (IHM) consultation with a CWH IHM provider, 4 Shared Medical Appointments (SMA), and 4 individual Health and Wellness Coaching (HWC) sessions. The SMA sessions occur at the UH CWH Beachwood office conference and movement rooms. The HWC sessions are virtual. The consultations are either virtual or in person at UH CWH Beachwood. Topics include meditation, sleep, yoga/exercise/movement, acupuncture, and nutrition
Participation in the program is not contingent on participation in the outcome evaluation. Patients with a uterus aged 18-50 who have a fertility-related diagnosis are eligible to participate in the program. Participants in the outcome evaluation will be a subset of the participants in the program who give their consent to researchers to collect survey and EHR data.
The outcome evaluation will collect data at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and before, after, and in between each of the 8 weekly sessions. Data collected at baseline include demographics, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a, Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), Infertility Self Efficacy Scale (ISE), and current Health Behaviors (HB). The HB survey will be administered between Sessions 1-8, as well as after Session 8, to observe any longitudinal changes. Patients will complete the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a, PSS-4, and ISE at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Pre- and post-session data includes 0-10 NRS ratings of stress, energy, focus, well-being, perceived support (post-only), and satisfaction (post-only). Additionally, participants will complete a satisfaction survey post Session 8. All data will be collected in REDCap via a text message or email link sent to the participant. Research staff will review the participant's medical record to collect data on the participant's demographics and clinical characteristics at baseline, and to collect chemical pregnancy data at six months after the 8 sessions have been completed. Attendance data about participants will also be collected.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult with a uterus aged from 18 to 50 years
- Participating in the Lifestyle Care for Fertility program
- Able to speak and understand English.
- Has email address and access to mobile device with a functioning data plan.
- Infertility-related diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 or > 50 years
- Having a significant and uncorrected visual, hearing, or cognitive impairment
- Inability to provide consent
- Current pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Servings of Fruit
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Number of servings of fruit consumed each day.
A serving is about 1 medium piece, or 1/2 cup of fruit.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Servings of Vegetables
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Number of servings of vegetables consumed each day.
A serving is about 1 cup of raw leafy vegetables, 1/2 cup of other cooked or raw vegetables, or 3/4 cup of raw vegetable juice.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Glasses of Water
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Number of glasses (8 oz) of plain water consumed per day.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Caffeinated Beverages
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Number of caffeinated beverages consumed per day.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Aerobic Exercise
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
|
Frequency of aerobic exercise (min 20 min) in last week.
|
8 Weeks
|
|
Strengthening Exercise
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of muscle strengthening exercise (min 20 min) in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Stretching Exercise
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of stretching exercise in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Sleep Hygiene
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of sleep hygiene practices before bed in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Hours of Sleep
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Average number of hours of sleep per night in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Biofeedback
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of use of biofeedback in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Breathing Exercises
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of breathing exercise practice in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Guided Imagery
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of guided imagery practice in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Mindfulness/Meditation
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of mindfulness/meditation practice in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Progressive Relaxation
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of progressive relaxation practice in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Journaling/Gratitude Journaling
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of journaling or gratitude journaling in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Tai Chi/Chi Gong
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of Tai Chi or Chi Gong practice in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self-Care - Massage Therapy
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of receipt of massage therapy in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Acupuncture/Acupressure
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of receipt of acupuncture or acupressure in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Self Care - Nature Walking
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Frequency of walking in nature in last week.
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Chemical pregnancy
Time Frame: 8 months
|
Pregnancy as confirmed by presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) within 6 months of program completion.
|
8 months
|
|
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
|
Number enrolled over number approached.
|
4-6 weeks
|
|
Retention Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percent of participants retained at each data collection point
|
8 weeks
|
|
Pace of Accrual
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Number of participants enrolled from each program cohort.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Data Completeness
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Percent of data collection that is completed
|
8 weeks
|
|
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Composite score (8 -40 with higher scores representing a better outcome) measuring self-reported alertness, sleepiness, tiredness, and functional impairments associated with sleep problems during waking hours within the past seven days.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale - 4
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Composite score (0-16 with higher scores representing a better outcome) measuring self-reported perception of stress.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Infertility Self Efficacy
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Composite score (16-144 with higher scores representing a better outcome) measuring self-reported perceived self-efficacy for coping with a diagnosis and treatment for infertility.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Stress Change (level of stress: none [0] to worst possible [10]) - SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with lower scores representing better outcomes: Change in stress level from pre to post each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Anxiety Change (level of anxiety right now: none [0] to worst possible [10]) - SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with lower scores representing better outcomes: Change in anxiety level from pre to post each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Energy Change (level of energy right now: no energy [0] to most energized [10]) - SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in energy level from pre to post each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Focus Change (level of energy right now: not focused at all [0] to very focused [10]) - SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in focus level from pre to post each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Wellbeing Change (level of energy right now: worst possible [0] to best possible [10]) - SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in wellbeing level from pre to post each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Stress Change (level of stress: none [0] to worst possible [10]) - HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale. Range from -11 to 11, with lower scores representing better outcomes: Change in stress level from pre to post each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions. |
45 minutes
|
|
Anxiety Change (level of anxiety right now: none [0] to worst possible [10]) - HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with lower scores representing better outcomes: Change in anxiety level from pre to post each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
|
Energy Change (level of energy right now: no energy [0] to most energized [10]) - HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in energy level from pre to post each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
|
Focus Change (level of energy right now: not focused at all [0] to very focused [10]) - HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in focus level from pre to post each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
|
Wellbeing Change (level of energy right now: worst possible [0] to best possible [10]) - HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Change in 11 point numerical rating scale.
Range from -11 to 11, with higher scores representing better outcomes: Change in wellbeing level from pre to post each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
|
Helpfulness of group sessions in addressing needs
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Coverage of important issues in the sessions
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Helpfulness of tools presented in nutrition session
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Helpfulness of tools presented in movement session
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Helpfulness of tools presented in relaxation and sleep session
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Helpfulness of tools presented in integrate session
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Enjoyed group sessions
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Enjoyed health and wellness coaching session
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Group setting was beneficial
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Comfortable in group setting
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Helpfulness of individual health coaching sessions
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
5-point Likert scale strongly disagree to strongly agree (1 - 5 with higher scores representing better outcomes)
|
8 weeks
|
|
Feedback questionnaire: Location Preference question 1
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Shared Medical Appointment session location preference.
Choices: virtual, in person or no preference.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Feedback questionnaire: Location Preference question 2
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Health and Wellness Coaching session location preference.
Choices: virtual, in person or no preference.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Feedback questionnaire: Number of Sessions question.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Opinion on number of sessions.
Choices: too few, just right, too many.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Feedback questionnaire: Length of Sessions question.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Opinion on length of sessions.
Choices: too short, just right, too long.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Rating of level of support during each SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
11-point Likert scale not supported to very well supported (0 - 10 with higher scores representing better outcomes): Level of support received during each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Rating of level of support during HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
11-point Likert scale not supported to very well supported (0 - 10 with higher scores representing better outcomes): Level of support received during each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
|
Overall level of satisfaction during each SMA
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
11-point Likert scale not at all satisfied to very well satisfied (0 - 10 with higher scores representing better outcomes): Overall level of satisfaction with each of the 4 shared medical appointment sessions.
|
2 hours
|
|
Overall level of satisfaction during each HWC
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
11-point Likert scale not at all satisfied to very well satisfied (0 - 10 with higher scores representing better outcomes): Overall level of satisfaction with each of the 4 health and wellness coaching sessions.
|
45 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christine Kaiser, DACM LAc, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY20231406
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fertility Issues
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyKarl and Veronica Carstens FoundationTerminatedFertility Issues | Fertility Disorders | IVF | Sub Fertility, Female | Sub-fertilityGermany
-
Carilion ClinicTerminatedFertility Issues | Fertility DisordersUnited States
-
IVFarma LLCInstitute for Preventive and Social MedicineCompletedFertility Issues | Fertility Disorders | IVF | Gynecologic Disease | Reproductive Issues | Reproductive DisorderRussian Federation
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalRecruitingFertility Issues | Reproductive IssuesSingapore
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationRecruiting
-
Port Said UniversityMansoura University; Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingFertility IssuesEgypt
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasCompleted
-
Regina Elena Cancer InstituteCompletedSurgery | Fertility Issues | OncologyItaly
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasCompletedFertility Issues | IVF | Embryo Transfer
Clinical Trials on Whole Health Lifestyle Care for Reproductive Well-being pilot program
-
Gdansk University of Physical Education and SportPomeranian Medical University Szczecin; Medical University of Gdansk; University...RecruitingDepression | Back Pain | Urinary Incontinence | Pregnancy | Anxiety | Body Composition | Cognitive Function | Pelvic Floor Disorders | Noncommunicable Diseases | Physical Fitness | Metabolism | Postpartum | Health Status | Pregnancy Induced Hypertension | Pain Threshold | Childbirth | Diabetes Mellitus, Gestational | Biomecha...Poland
-
Xavier University of Louisiana.Active, not recruitingPrediabetes | Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance) | Prediabetic State &Amp; High Risk Individuals on the Basis of Diabetes Risk ScoreUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Recruiting
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Wake Forest UniversityActive, not recruitingBreast CancerUnited States
-
Children's Oncology GroupActive, not recruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | Mixed Phenotype Acute LeukemiaUnited States, Canada, Australia