- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02738411
Influence of Intestinal Microbiota Implantation in Preterm Infants on Microbiota and Immune Orientation at 3 Years (PrimiBiota)
February 29, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Influence of Intestinal Microbiota Implantation Parameters in the Neonatal Period in Premature Infants on Microbiota Profiles and Immune Orientation at 3 Years of Age
The main objective of this research is to study the links between changes in the intestinal microbiota (in terms of diversity) during the first 6 weeks of life for preterm infants and the presence / absence of a TH1 immune status at 36 months of age.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
The secondary objectives are to study the links between changes of the intestinal microbiota premature infants in terms of:
- changing diversity of the microbiota in the first 6 weeks of life;
- changes in the bacterial community (UniFrac study) during the first 6 weeks of life;
- diversity of the microbiota up to 6 weeks;
-AND-
- diversity of the microbiota at 1, 2 & 3 years;
- bacterial communities (UniFrac study) at 1, 2 & 3 years;
- lymphocyte subpopulation profiles at 3 years;
- serum immunoglobulin A, G, M, E levels at 3 years;
- history of infectious episodes, allergic and inflammatory episodes during the first 3 years of life.
The links between certain variables known in the literature and neonatal microbiota will be confirmed / studied in our population:
- mode of delivery;
- length (and type) of antibiotic therapy in the neonatal period;
- duration of breastfeeding.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
130
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
- CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
-
Nîmes Cedex 09, France, 30029
- CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
-
Saint Gely Du Fesc, France, 34980
- Réseau GRANDIR EN LANGUEDOC-ROUSILLON
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 1 day (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population consists of premature babies born at < 33 months gestation.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The parents of the patient (or legal guardian if any) have been informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, its constraints, and patient rights
- The parents of the patient (or legal guardian if any) must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- Premature infants born at less than 33 weeks of gestation
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is participating in another interventional study (Excepted " Recherche du Portage de Clostridium butyricum et de Toxines de Clostridium chez les Prématurés Hospitalisés en Néonatologie afin de prédire la survenue d'Entérocolites Nécrosantes", RCB 2016-A00-529-42 ; " BetaDose Dose reduction of antenatal betamethasone given to prevent the neonatal complications associated with very preterm birth ", RCB 2016-001486-90.
- It is not possible to correctly inform the parent (or legal guardian, if applicable)
- A serious deformity or digestive malformation was diagnosed at birth
- During the hospital stay in the neonatology department, the patient had a digestive disease requiring surgery (except necrotizing enterocolitis)
- A transfer to another hospital is foreseen/predictable (eg, due to geographical distance)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
The study population
The study population corresponds to infants born at less than 33 weeks of gestation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The presence/absence of a Th1 type immune orientation
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Immune orientation will be determined according to the following ratio determined by lymphocyte stimulation tests: INF-gamma/(INF-gamma+IL+4).
The latter ratio varies between 0 and 0.5 with IL-4 > INF-gamma (TH2 orientation) and between 0.5 and 1 when INF-gamma > IL-4 (TH1 orientation).
|
36 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Blood lymphocyte subset determination
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Subsets are determined according to the presence/absence of the following differentiation clusters: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD25, CD56, CD127, FOXP3.
|
36 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Serum Immunoglobulin A level
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Serum Immunoglobulin G level
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Serum Immunoglobulin M level
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Serum Immunoglobulin E level
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
The number of days in good health and no medications
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Week 1
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Week 2
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Week 3
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Week 4
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Week 5
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Week 6
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
Richness of fecal microbiota (number of operational taxonomic units observed)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Week 1
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Week 2
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Week 3
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Week 4
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Week 5
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Week 6
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
Diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 1
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 2
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 3
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 4
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 5
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 6
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
12 months
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
24 months
|
Functional richness of fecal microbiota (number of functional groups observed)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
36 months
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 1
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 2
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 3
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 4
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 5
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
Week 6
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
12 months
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
24 months
|
Functional diversity of fecal microbiota (Shannon's index)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Functional groups are determined via the classification of each OTU according to the following factors: 1) pathogenicity (pathogen/intermediate/commensal); 2) aerobic versus anaerobic; 3) Cocci + versus others.
|
36 months
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Week 1
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Week 2
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Week 3
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Week 4
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Week 5
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Week 6
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
The relative abundance of primary fecal microbiota families
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Day 0 (first meconium)
|
Day 0 (first meconium)
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 1
|
Week 1
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 2
|
Week 2
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 3
|
Week 3
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Week 4
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Week 5
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Week 6
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
Fecal microbiota unifrac ordination score
Time Frame: 36 months
|
36 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Anne Filleron, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 12, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 28, 2022
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 13, 2016
First Posted (Estimated)
April 14, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 29, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PHRC-I/2015/AF-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infant, Premature
-
University of MiamiPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileTerminated
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...TerminatedInfant, Premature | Infant, Newborn
-
NICHD Neonatal Research NetworkNational Center for Research Resources (NCRR)CompletedSepsis | Infant, Small for Gestational Age | Infant, Premature | Infant, Low Birth Weight | Infant, NewbornUnited States
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedNursing Caries | Infant Development | Premature Infant Disease | Patient ComfortTurkey
-
University of VirginiaRecruitingDevelopment, Infant | Premature Infant DiseaseUnited States
-
Universidad de LeónCompletedPremature Birth | Premature Infant | Massage | Preterm Infant
-
Istituto Giannina GasliniEubrainRecruiting
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedPreterm Birth | Cerebral Autoregulation | Premature Infant DiseaseItaly
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingPremature Infant DiseaseChina
-
Christiana Care Health ServicesCompletedInfant | Infant, Premature | Infant, Preterm | Infant, LateUnited States