- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02738788
Airway Changes in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures in the Prone and Trendelenburg Positions
Assessing Intraoperative Airway Changes and Their Regression to Baseline in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures in the Prone and Trendelenburg Positions
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: One of the primary methods to assess airway dimension changes is the Modified Mallampati Score (MMS). MMS has been a valuable tool in assessing difficulty of intubation in previous studies as it is a simple, reproducible, and reliable preoperative and preanesthetic assessment of oral volume. MMS is evaluated by asking the patient to open their mouth and protrude their tongue without phonation. A score on a scale of 1-4 is assigned based on identifiable intraoral anatomic structures. MMS scores of 3 and 4 are strongly associated with difficult laryngoscopy and intubation.
Extensive observational research in the obstetric population has demonstrated that airway changes, including increasing MMS and decreasing oropharyngeal volume, occur during labor. It has been found that 63% of parturients experienced an increase in MMS over the course of their labor, with the fraction of patients scoring 3 or 4 peaking at 51.7%, compared with only 10.3% early in labor. Notably, of those patients that reached a class 4, 21% remained at that classification 48 hours postpartum. It has been found that 18% of patients whose airway class worsened during labor had not returned to their prelabor class 36-48 hours after delivery.
These obstetric findings have prompted a limited number of studies investigating airway changes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study will focus on surgeries in the prone and Trendelenburg positions, as they would intuitively predispose patients to edema and fluid retention in the head and neck. MMS increased in 78% of patients, with 29% increasing by two or more classes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. Furthermore, although laparoscopic surgery has been shown to increase lung and chest wall mechanical impedance, which leads to increases in abdominal and intrathoracic pressure, as well as an increase in central venous pressure with subsequent increases in intraocular pressure, no studies have been performed to specifically track resultant airway changes. Lastly, to investigators' knowledge no studies have investigated the postoperative resolution of airway changes after either type of procedure.
Rationale: There is evidence, both investigational and anecdotal, that airway changes may occur during certain surgeries or procedures, and that patient positioning may play a large role in precipitating them. However, research on this phenomenon in the surgical population, unlike the obstetric population, is sparse. Similarly, investigations into the time required for airway changes to regress back to baseline has been included in a number of obstetric airway studies, but not in any surgical ones. Lastly, it has been suggested that other surgical factors, such as fluid balance or procedure duration, may alter the degree of airway changes, but results from the few recent studies on the topic have been unclear. Thus, this study seeks to further investigate the influence of prone and Trendelenburg positioning, as well as surgical variables, on perioperative airway changes, and quantify the time required for patients' airways to return to their preoperative state.
Based on clinical observation, the primary hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference between mean scoring class change between 2 study groups from preoperative baseline to initial postoperative assessment. Investigators hypothesize that T-burg surgery patients will have a mean change of 2 classes compared to a mean change of only one class for prone spine surgery patients.
The secondary hypothesis is that airway changes occurring in patients undergoing prone procedures will resolve significantly sooner than (3 - 4 hours) than those of patients undergoing Trendelenburg surgeries (> 4 hours).
Thirdly investigators will investigate the effects of demographic, physiological, and surgical & anesthetic variables on postoperative MMS changes and their resolution.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
- Tufts Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery in the prone position or laparoscopic or surgery in the Trendelenburg position.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a preoperative MMS of 4, existing oropharyngeal pathology, or the inability to fully open their mouth, or severely limited neck mobility
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in MMS after surgery
Time Frame: 1-4 hours after surgery
|
Based on institutional observations, we expect both prone and Trendelenburg patients to exhibit significant airway changes/increases in MMS after surgery.
Additionally, we expect to find that these changes will require approximately 4 hours to fully regress, and that perioperative and intraoperative factors, such as IV fluid and steroid administration, will affect both the degree of airway changes and the time course of their regression.
|
1-4 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB 11705
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Management
-
Bursa City HospitalEmre ULUSOYNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Difficult AirwayTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Royal Hospital, OmanNot yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
NHS TaysideTerminated
-
Akdeniz University HospitalCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Obstetric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kocaeli City HospitalActive, not recruitingAirway Management | Airway Complication of AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
Mongi Slim HospitalCompletedAirway Management | Upper Airway Sonographic EvaluationTunisia
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Thomas RivaThe Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Charite... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAirway ManagementUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Canada, Germany, Brazil
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Intubation
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRecruitingIntubation | Intubation, Endotracheal | Intubation Complications | Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation | Delayed Sequence IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Government Medical College, HaldwaniCompletedIntubation; Difficult
-
Tepecik Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompleted
-
Zeliha AlicikusNot yet recruitingObesity | Airway Complication of Anesthesia | Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
Norwegian Air Ambulance FoundationWithdrawnCraniocerebral Trauma | Trauma | Seizures | Unconsciousness | Intracerebral HemorrhageNorway
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedMallampati Score, Difficult Intubation, VideolaryngoscopeTurkey
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompletedIntubation | VideolaryngoscopyCanada
-
Trakya UniversityCompletedDifficult Intubation
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Abdominal Surgery | Surgical Incision | ElectroencephalogramSouth Korea