Liver Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

April 27, 2016 updated by: Ming Kuang, Sun Yat-sen University

Liver Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prospective Non-randomized Trial

The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the standard therapy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being challenged by increasing studies which showed that liver resection (LR) is a safe and feasible procedure with better survival outcomes than TACE does.

In light of this, the investigators have constructed a Markov model to simulate comparing LR and TACE in the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The results suggested that LR may provide survival benefit over TACE for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC in cirrhotic patients. However, validating the simulated result by a study with higher quality (e.g. prospective clinical trial) would be of great value in providing a more convincing finding. Therefore, based on the established Markov model, the investigators aimed to prospectively compare the treatment efficacy and safety of LR with TACE for consecutive patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 5th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer. However, the management strategies for intermediate-stage HCC remain controversial without global consensus. On one hand, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system recommends liver resection (LR) for very early and early-stage HCC, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage HCC. On the other hand, observational studies in both Eastern and Western countries have emerged to suggest that LR was safe and achieved better survival than TACE for patients with intermediate-stage HCC, but only very few studies have been conducted to directly compare LR with TACE for these patients.

In light of this, the investigators have conducted a multistate Markov model simulating a randomized clinical trial comparing LR with TACE over a follow-up period of 15 years. The results suggested that LR may provide survival benefit over TACE for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC in cirrhotic patients. However, validating the simulated result by a study with higher quality (e.g. prospective clinical trial) would be of great value in providing a more convincing finding.Therefore, based on the established Markov model,the investigators aimed to prospectively compare the treatment efficacy and safety of LR with TACE for consecutive patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

198

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 75 years
  • 2 to 3 lesions with at least one >3 cm in diameter; or more than 3 lesions of any diameter
  • Child-Pugh A/B liver function
  • no previous treatment
  • an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0

Exclusion Criteria:

  • radiologic or pathological evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases
  • severe coagulopathy (prothrombin activity <40% or a platelet count of<40,000/mm3)
  • evidence of hepatic decompensation including refractory ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy
  • obstructive jaundice
  • an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or more
  • present or past history of any other concurrent malignancies
  • complicated with other severe diseases such as chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, auto-immunological disease, etc
  • contraindications to carboplatin, epirubicin, mitomycin, or lipiodol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: liver resection
Resection was carried out under general anesthesia using a right subcostal incision with a midline extension. Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely to evaluate the tumor burden, liver remnant and the possibility of a negative resection margin. The investigators performed anatomical resection aiming at a resection margin of at least 1 cm. Pringle's maneuver was routinely used with a clamp and unclamp time of 10 minutes and 5 minutes, respectively. Hemostasis of the raw liver surface was done with suturing and application of fibrin glue.
Intraoperative ultrasound was routinely used during surgery. Anatomic resection was carried out in the form of segmentectomy or/and subsegmentectomy.In segmentectomy, the hepatic parenchyma was transacted at the intersegmental plane as described by Couinaud. If the hepatic parenchymal transaction plane needed to go beyond the intersegmental plane to achieve the desired extent of resection margin, the small portal branches supplying the liver parenchyma up to the intended transaction plane were punctured under US guidance and injected with methylthioninium chloride, and then liver subsegmentectomy was performed either alone or in combination with segmentectomy along the plane of demarcation as delineated by the injected methylthioninium chloride. Nonanatomic resection with a negative resection margin was performed when anatomical resection may cause inadequate liver remnant. Pringle's maneuver was used if necessary with a clamp/unclamp time of 10 min/5 min.
Other Names:
  • Hepatectomy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: transarterial chemoembolization
A microcatheter was inserted into the feeding arteries as selectively as possible through the lobar, segmental, or subsegmental arteries, dependent on the tumor distribution and hepatic functional reserve. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy was performed using 300 mg carboplatin. Subsequently, chemolipiodolization was performed mixed with 5 ml of lipiodol. According to the number and size of the lesions, and liver and kidney function of the patient, the chemotherapeutic agents, including epirubicin (50-100 mg), pirarubicin (30-50 mg), hydroxycamptothecin (10-30 mg) and fluorouracil (500-1000 mg), were determined by the multidisciplinary team. If residual flow remained after infusion of these agents, additional lipiodol was injected. Embolization was performed with absorbable gelatin sponge particles 350-560 μm in diameter.
A microcatheter was inserted into the feeding arteries as selectively as possible through the lobar, segmental, or subsegmental arteries, dependent on the tumor distribution and hepatic functional reserve. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy was performed using 300 mg carboplatin. Subsequently, chemolipiodolization was performed mixed with 5 ml of lipiodol. According to the number and size of the lesions, and liver and kidney function of the patient, the chemotherapeutic agents, including epirubicin (50-100 mg), pirarubicin (30-50 mg), hydroxycamptothecin (10-30 mg) and fluorouracil (500-1000 mg), were determined by the multidisciplinary team. If residual flow remained after infusion of these agents, additional lipiodol was injected. Embolization was performed with absorbable gelatin sponge particles 350-560 μm in diameter.
Other Names:
  • TACE
  • chemoembolization through artery
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy was performed using 300 mg carboplatin (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY).
Other Names:
  • a drug derived from cisplatin
Chemolipiodolization was performed mixed with 5 ml of lipiodol (Lipiodol Ultra-Fluide; André Guerbet Laboratories, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France).
The chemotherapeutic agents, including epirubicin (50-100 mg), pirarubicin (30-50 mg), hydroxycamptothecin (10-30 mg) and fluorouracil (500-1000 mg), were determined by the multidisciplinary team.
Other Names:
  • epirubicin,pirarubicin,hydroxycamptothecin or fluorouracil
Embolization was performed with absorbable gelatin sponge particles (Gelfoam; Hangzhou Bi-Trumed Biotech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) 350-560 μm in diameter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 1 year
1-year overall survival
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 1 month
1-month mortality
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on liver resection

Subscribe