Accelerated Pre-treatment Evaluation for HCV Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs

July 26, 2021 updated by: Valérie Martel-Laferrière, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Impact of an Accelerated Pre-treatment Evaluation on Linkage-to-care and Linkage-to-treatment for HCV Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs

Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are overrepresented among hepatitis C infected patients, but underrepresented among those who are treated, despite many studies showing that treatment is feasible and effective in this population.

The hepatitis C diagnosis and pre-treatment evaluation are multistep processes. Every step is a potential occasion for disengagement and loss to follow-up. This is especially true with hard-to-reach populations such as PWID in whom competing needs are numerous and psychosocial situation can change rapidly.

By using new technologies that can quickly provide clinical results, like Xpert HCV Viral Load (Cepheid) and transient elastography (fibroscan), a provider could determine if a patient needs treatment rapidly or not on the day of the initial visit.

The aim of this study is to explore whether an accelerated pre-treatment evaluation can result in an improved linkage-to-care (defined as linkage to health care, addiction or social services) and, eventually, linkage-to-treatment among PWID.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a non-randomized, open-label study that aims to include HCV-infected patients who inject drugs and who do not know their treatment eligibility status. A total of 200 patients will be evaluated using our rapid evaluation protocol, which will include basic blood tests, viral load measurement using Cepheid's Xpert® HCV Viral Load technique (which will be controlled at the same time by COBAS® AmpliPrep/ COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Quantitative Test, version 2.0 (Roche), available at the CHUM and approved by Health Canada), a liver fibrosis assessment and HCV genotyping. The results of the basic tests, viral load tests and FibroScan® test will be available on the same day as the patient's visit and will allow the investigator to determine straightaway whether or not the patient is treatable based on the RAMQ's reimbursement criteria at the time of the study.

If the patient is treatable, once the genotype result has been obtained, the most appropriate treatment for their medical condition, degree of liver fibrosis and genotype will be prescribed. There will be no other visits between the initial visit and the treatment initiation visit. The patient will be given an appointment for the treatment initiation visit once the medication has been approved by the RAMQ or the patient's private insurer. The patient will be seen again at weeks 2 and 4 of treatment, at the end of treatment (usually week 12), then 12, 24 and 36 weeks post-treatment.

If the patient is not treatable, he/she will be referred to the CHUM Addiction Medicine Clinic or the UHRESS (if HIV-coinfected status) for management, which will include longitudinal follow-up of his HCV and substance abuse. The patient will be seen again at 6 months and 1 year to determine whether or not there has been linkage-to-care, initiation of opioid substitution therapy if indicated and if the patient has reduced his injection drug use.

If an untreatable patient becomes treatable during follow-up, treatment will be offered.

At the same time, we will review the records of patients seen at the CHUM Addiction Medicine Clinic between October 2014 and June 2016 who meet the inclusion criteria for the study cohort and the RAMQ's treatment eligibility criteria. This cohort will be used as an historical cohort to determine the rate of linkage to treatment with the standard pre-treatment evaluation protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3J4
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Person who inject drugs, defined as having injected in the past year
  • Able to give an informed consent
  • Unknown treatment eligibility status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients actively engaged in HCV follow up
  • Patients visibly intoxicated at initial study visit
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Pacemaker.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rapid evaluation
Transient elastography, Xpert HCV Viral load, medical and nurse visits
HCV viral load testing
Evaluation of liver fibrosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who initiate treatment after first visit
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients who initiate treatment among those who are treatment-eligible based on Quebec's treatment reimbursement guidelines following the accelerated intervention and comparison with historical controls
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who attend at least two visits in 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare linkage-to-care proportion at one year of treated PWID with untreated PWID at one year.
6 months
Proportion of patients who initiate opioid substitution therapy during follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare opioid substitution therapy initiation rates at one year of treated and untreated PWID.
6 months
Difference in number of injection between the month prior to study entry and the last month of follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare drug use reduction during the study period of treated PWID with untreated PWID at one year.
6 months
Sustained virological response (undetectable HCV viral load 12 weeks post-end-of-treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-treatment
To compare proportion of treated patients who achieved SVR12 with historical controls treated in phase III trials.
12 weeks post-treatment
Proportion of patients with a re-infection within six months of end-of-treatment
Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment
To evaluate rapid re-infection rates (<6 months) of patients who achieve end-of-treatment undetectability.
6 months post-treatment
Difference in HCV viral load results between techniques
Time Frame: At enrollment
To compare Xpert HCV Viral Load® (Cepheid) viral loads results to HCV RealTime® (Abbott) results.
At enrollment
Recontact of initially untreatable patients
Time Frame: 1 year
To determine the proportion of patients who change from untreatable to treatable that can be successfully recontacted and linked to care among patients initially classified as untreatable
1 year
Treatment of initially untreatable patients
Time Frame: 1 year
To determine the proportion of patients who will initiate HCV treatment among those who were initially classified as untreable.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Valérie Martel-Laferrière, MD, MSc, CRCHUM

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on Xpert HCV Viral load

3
Subscribe