More Than a Machine: Make Point-of-care HIV-1 Viral Load Testing Effective in Rural Uganda

IGHID 11920 - More Than a Machine: Exploring the Ancillary Systems and Processes Required to Make Point-of-care HIV-1 Viral Load Testing Effective in Rural Western Uganda

This is a two-phase study designed to assess measures of feasibility, sustainability, acceptability, penetration, and fidelity before and after implementation of a rapid molecular HIV-1 viral load testing infrastructure at a level III health center in rural western Uganda.

The central hypothesis is that implementation of PoC HIV-1 testing without accompanying modifications to clinic triage and flow, laboratory processes, and existing protocols guiding adherence counseling and regimen change, will not result in significant improvement in clinical outcomes in PLWH.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a two-phase study designed to assess measures of feasibility, sustainability, acceptability, penetration, and fidelity before and after implementation of a rapid molecular HIV-1 viral load testing infrastructure at a level III health center in rural western Uganda.

In Phase 1, the study team will perform/record the following:

  1. Administer a basic demographic and health questionnaire
  2. Record routine clinical parameters during visit to include:

    1. Current ARV and prophylaxis regimen
    2. Last CD4 and VL, if available
    3. Clinical illness since last visit
  3. Document the amount of time each patient spends in each phase of clinic (i.e. waiting room, provider, phlebotomy, waiting for results, adherence counseling).
  4. Measure the number of participants requiring HIV-1 VL testing each clinic day, proportion electing to receive results by phone or at next visit.
  5. Patients having blood drawn for HIV-1 VL testing will complete a semi-structured interview to explore perceptions of the current testing paradigm when results are received.
  6. Provider and laboratory staff will complete a semi-structured interview to explore perceptions of the current testing paradigm with emphasis on workload

In Phase 2, the study team will perform/record the following:

  1. Record routine clinical parameters during visit to include:

    1. Current ARV and prophylaxis regimen
    2. Last CD4 and VL, if available
    3. Clinical illness since last visit
  2. Determine the amount of time each patient spends in each phase of clinic (i.e. waiting room, provider, phlebotomy, waiting for results, adherence counseling).
  3. Measure the number of Xpert HIV-1 tests performed, the amount of time laboratory staff spends performing the tests and conducting maintenance, the number of tests failures and/or invalid tests, and equipment downtime related problems with software or power supply.
  4. Measure the number of participants requiring HIV-1 VL testing each clinic day, proportion electing to receive results on same day, by phone, or next visit.
  5. Patients having blood drawn for HIV-1 VL testing will complete a semi-structured interview to explore perceptions of the current testing paradigm when results are received.
  6. Provider and laboratory staff will complete a semi-structured interview to explore perceptions of the current testing paradigm with emphasis on workload.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

242

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mbarara, Uganda, PO Box 1410
        • Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST)
    • Kasese
      • Bugoye, Kasese, Uganda
        • Bugoye Level III Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients aged 18 years or older receiving care at the Bugoye Health Center Antiretroviral therapy clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older receiving care at the Bugoye Health Center Antiretroviral therapy clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Target Population
HIV positive individuals attending Bugoye ART clinic
Rapid, on-site molecular HIV-1 viral load testing used in accordance with cleared/approved labeling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Tests Performed Successfully Each Clinic Day
Time Frame: Each clinic day for up to six months
HIV viral load tests performed at peripheral health center
Each clinic day for up to six months
Number of Tests Performed Successfully each Month
Time Frame: Each month for up to six months
HIV viral load tests performed at peripheral health center
Each month for up to six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Eligible Patients Electing to Stay to Receive Results
Time Frame: Each clinic day for up to six months
Acceptability of rapid HIV viral load results
Each clinic day for up to six months
Proportion of Eligible Patients Electing to Stay to Receive Results
Time Frame: Each month for up to six months
Acceptability of rapid HIV viral load results
Each month for up to six months
Mean Time Clients Spend in Clinic
Time Frame: Each clinic day for up to 9 months
Impact on routine ART Clinic flow
Each clinic day for up to 9 months
Provider Perception of Workload
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention (approximately 6 months apart)
Perceived time spent conducting on-site testing vs send-out testing
Pre- and post-intervention (approximately 6 months apart)
Mean and median time-to-result
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after blood draw, after which considered not returned
Mean and median number of days from blood draw to client receiving viral load result either from current standard of care or on-site testing
Up to 90 days after blood draw, after which considered not returned
Machine Down-Time and Maintenance
Time Frame: Each clinic day (i.e. weekly) during the 6 months of Phase 2 when the Xpert is operational
Total number of hours spent in maintenance, trouble-shooting, or repair
Each clinic day (i.e. weekly) during the 6 months of Phase 2 when the Xpert is operational

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ross M Boyce, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-2363
  • P30AI050410 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 to 36 months following publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

An investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load Assay

Subscribe