- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02788942
The Removing Port of the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Material
February 16, 2019 updated by: Ufuk Oguz Idiz, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
The Relationship Between the Removing Port of the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Material and the Port Site Infections
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is gold standard for gallstones.
In this study the investigators are investigating the effect of the removing of cholecystectomy material from different ports, to the port site infections.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is gold standard for gallstones.
But there is no consensus about which port place is optimal for the removing of the cholecystectomy material from the abdomen.
There are different port site infections rates in the literature.
The minimal tissue damage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests a lower risk of wound infection, but there are series with an infection range of 8 %.
The investigators are investigating is there any difference at the port site infection rates when the cholecystectomy material removed from different ports from the abdomen at the laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34371
- Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has cholelithiasis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has perforated gallbladder
- Subject has malignancy
- Subject has increasing wall thickness of the gallbladder
- Subject has malignancy in the preoperative ultrasonography in the gallbladder
- Subject has pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SCREENING
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Umbilical
The cholecystectomy material will be removed from umbilical port as usual.
This will be control group.
Port site infection rates will be measured.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Epigastric
The cholecystectomy material will be removed from epigastric port.
This will be experimental group.
Port site infection rates will be measured.
|
The cholecystectomy material will be removed from epigastric port.
This will be experimental group.
Port site infection rates will be measured
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Port site infections
Time Frame: 2 days
|
The cholecystectomy material will be removed from umbilical port at the control group, from the epigastric port at the experimental group.
The port site infection rates will be noted.
|
2 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cemal Kaya, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Jimeno J, Gris P, Orbeal R, Cruz A, Pares D. Effect of bag extraction to prevent wound infection on umbilical port site wound on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):249-254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4965-z. Epub 2016 May 13.
- Farooq U, Rashid T, Naheed A, Barkat N, Iqbal M, Sultana Q. COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: AN EXPERIENCE OF 247 CASES. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Apr-Jun;27(2):407-10.
- Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Gris P, Jimeno J, Orbeal R, Vallverdu H, Lopez Negre JL, Urgelles J, Estalella L, Pares D. Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2016
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 27, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 2, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 19, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 16, 2019
Last Verified
February 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Trochar
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Once a three months time
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound Infection
-
Pulmatrix Inc.TerminatedPost Operative Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection-deepUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruitingWound Infection and Wound HealingUnited States
-
Carilion ClinicSmith & Nephew, Inc.; DeRoyal Industries, Inc.CompletedImpaired Wound Healing | Postoperative Wound Infection-deepUnited States
-
PolyPid Ltd.CompletedPostoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Postoperative Wound Infection Deep Incisional Surgical SiteIsrael
-
Children's Healthcare of AtlantaWithdrawnPostoperative Wound InfectionUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical SciencesCompletedWound Infection | Wound Dehiscence | Wound Surgical | Wound BleedingPakistan
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaHospital de GranollersCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Preventive TherapySpain
-
Prof. Dr. Bülent M. ErtuğrulBaşakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalActive, not recruitingIdentification | Wound Infection BacterialTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Military Medical AcademyRecruitingPostoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Postoperative Wound Infection Deep Incisional Surgical SiteBulgaria
Clinical Trials on Removing from Epigastric port
-
Kaplan Medical CenterUnknown
-
University of California, IrvineBeckman Laser Institute University of California IrvineCompletedPort-Wine StainUnited States
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedDyspepsia | Gastrointestinal System DiseaseTurkey