Is the NPWTi Better Than the Conventional NPWT

September 15, 2023 updated by: Military Medical Academy

NPWTi vs. Conventional NPWT in Superficial and Deep Abdominal Surgical Site Infections

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of NPWTi and NPWT in superficial and deep surgical site infections using an improvised system with continuous lavage with saline and chlorhexidine. The main question it aims to answer is whether the NPWTi is better than conventional NPWT. Participants will be given NPWTi or conventional NPWT.

Researchers will compare the two groups to see if NPWTi diminishes the rate of recurrent infections and the number of reoperations, shortens the hospital stay, and alleviates the burden on the hospital staff in comparison to the conventional NPWT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1606
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Sugery
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ventsislav Mutafchiyski, DSc, FACS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kirien Kjossev, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dimitar Penchev, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daniel Stefanov, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults over 18 years
  • superficial or deep SSIs after laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • persons < 18 years
  • documented inherited or acquired coagulation disorders or platelet deficiency
  • presence of deep space infection (intra-abdominal abscess or ongoing peritonitis)
  • prosthetic material infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NPWTi
The whole wound was filled with black foam (Granufoam®, KCI). The instillation was performed via gravity from i.v. bag through a drain put within the foam. Chlorhexidine 0.1% 300 ml in 700 ml saline was used for continuous instillation three times daily (3 L per day) on the background of continuous pressure of 125 mmHg. The dressing changes were performed every 48-72 hours.
The wound was filled with black foam (Granufoam®, KCI). The instillation was performed via gravity from i.v. bag through a drain put within the foam. Chlorhexidine 0.1% 300 ml in 700 ml saline was used for continuous instillation three times daily (3 L per day) on the background of continuous pressure of 125 mmHg.
Active Comparator: conventional NPWT
The wound was filled with black foam (Granufoam®, KCI) and covered with plastic folio. A continuous pressure of 125 mmHg was applied using the hospital suction system. The dressing changes were performed every 48 hours.
Conventional NPWT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
eradication of the infection
Time Frame: 6 weeks
(negative microbiology or bacterial count < 103)
6 weeks
the rate of wound closure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
the wound closure by suture or flap
6 weeks
30-day recurrence rate
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
30-day recurrence rate of the infection
30 days after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 weeks
hospital stay in days
6 weeks
number of OR visits
Time Frame: 6 weeks
number of OR visits and dressing changes under general anesthesia
6 weeks
time to wound closure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
the time elapsed from the start of the treatment to wound closure
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ventsislav Mutafchiyski, DSc, FACS, Military Medical Academy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional

Clinical Trials on NPWTi

3
Subscribe