MRI Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Modifications Inside the Intervertebral Disk After Distraction and Posterior Fusion

February 5, 2025 updated by: Tamas Illes, Brugmann University Hospital

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is the primary cause of low back pain. The most important factor in the development of DDD is the vertical load force on the disc, increasing the hydrostatic pressure and facilitating discs degenerations. One of the most common conditions accompanying DDD is segmental instability of the spine. The pathogenesis evolves in three phases characterized by a progressive disc dehydration and loss of the disc height.

This phenomenon can be observed in magnetic resonance imaging (T2 weighted MRI) as a decrease of the water signal inside the intervertebral disc. It is considered as an indirect sign of the alteration of the composition (including glycosaminoglycans) and the structure of the intervertebral disk with, as consequence, a modification of the spine biomechanics. Animal studies showed that disc regeneration could be enhanced by a decrease of the hydrostatic pressure. This could be observed as a signal increase on T2 weighted MRI.

Recent quantitative MRI sequences now allow the quantification of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) concentration inside the cartilage and in the intervertebral disc.

The actual surgical trends are in favor of an anterior (intersomatic) vertebrak fusion, associated or not with a posterior fusion. These technics sacrifice the intervertebral disc and change the spine biomechanics.

Based on a pilot study, the investigators believe that the conservation and even a regeneration of the intervertebral disc is possible and allows the preservation of the spine biomechanics.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the relations between specific MRI signals, the GAGs concentration, and the functional outcome before and after the surgical treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • CHU Brugmann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with segmental instability of the lumbar spine
  • Patient with planned surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • clinical and iconographic signs of neurological compression
  • intervertebral disc completely degenerated
  • infection
  • spondylolisthesis (superior to grade I)
  • fracture
  • neoplasia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lumbar spine segmental instability
Patients with a segmental instability of the lumbar spine having undergone surgery. Lumbar spine instability diagnosis is based on imaging (Magnetic resonance imaging, standard radiography, and EOS imaging). Surgical treatment is indicated if the pain is relieved by wearing a brace during at least three months.
Specific MRI sequences (delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage -dGEMRIC) performed before the surgery, 6 months and 1 year after surgery will allow to measure the following parameters: disc height, total lumbar spine lenght, GAGs concentration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration of the intervertebral disk
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
GAG concentration is estimated using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Baseline: before surgery
Gycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration of the intervertebral disk
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
GAG concentration is estimated using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Six months after surgery
Gycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration of the intervertebral disk
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
GAG concentration is estimated using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disc height
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Baseline: before surgery
Disc height
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Six months after surgery
Disc height
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
1 year after surgery
Total lumbar spine length
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Baseline: before surgery
Total lumbar spine length
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
Six months after surgery
Total lumbar spine length
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Will be measured using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique
1 year after surgery
Lumbar lordosis angle
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
Will be measured by the EOS imaging system.
Baseline: before surgery
Lumbar lordosis angle
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
Will be measured by the EOS imaging system.
Six months after surgery
Lumbar lordosis angle
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Will be measured by the EOS imaging system.
1 year after surgery
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the Oswestry Disability questionnaire.
Baseline: before surgery
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the Oswestry Disability questionnaire.
Six months after surgery
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the Oswestry Disability questionnaire.
1 year after surgery
SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline: before surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the SF-36 questionnaire relative to the quality of life.
Baseline: before surgery
SF-36
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the SF-36 questionnaire relative to the quality of life.
Six months after surgery
SF-36
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Estimation of the functional state of the patient by the SF-36 questionnaire relative to the quality of life.
1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dinh Qui Du PHAN, MD, CHU Brugmann
  • Principal Investigator: Tamas ILLES, MD, CHU Brugmann

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

June 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHUB-DGemric

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spine Instability

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Subscribe