- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03007056
High Flow Nasal Cannula in Preterm Infants (HIFLO)
Effect of High-flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on Exposure to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Preterm Infants
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is widely used in preterm infants as it is efficient, but it creates an unfavorable environment for preterm infants. Indeed is a primary source of continuous noise in neonatal units and causes discomfort, pain, skin lesions. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) introduced more recently in neonatal care supplies high allowing for carbon dioxide nasopharyngeal wash-out, reduction of work of breathing and is well tolerated. HFNC could help to improve the environment of preterm infants by reducing deleterious stimuli (noise, pain, discomfort) and by facilitating the contact between parents and babies. Efficacy of HFNC seems to be similar to other non-invasive respiratory supports for preventing treatment failure, death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The benefits of HFNC implementation was only slightly analyzed in extremely preterm infants. the place of HFNC is becoming increasingly important in neonatology and could help to improve the quality of care. Few HFNC devices are available but their cost of use has not been evaluated in Europe.
HIFLO study aimed to assess the impact of HFNC therapy introduction, on exposure to nCPAP and on the duration of oxygen therapy and hospital stay in preterm infants and in a subgroup of extremely preterm infants. The investigators also aim to evaluate the cost of use of nCPAP and HFNC using two different devices.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lyon, France, 69004
- Hopital de la Croix Rousse
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants born before 32 weeks of gestational age
- Birth weight below 1500 g
- Infants hospitalized within the first 48 hours of life
- Infants discharged home from our unit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infants transferred to another unit
- Infants with a severe malformation
- Infants requiring surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Period 1
year 2011 nCPAP
|
|
Period 2
year 2014 nCPAP and high flow nasal cannula
|
High flow nasal cannula added to the therapeutic arsenal in neonatal care
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of exposure to nCPAP, expressed in days in the population of very preterm infants.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The study aim to compare two periods, before and after HFNC implementation.
During the first period, in 2011, nCPAP (Infant FlowSiPAP) was used as a first-line non-invasive respiratory support.
During the second period, in 2014, the use of HFNC support was established as soon as it was possible instead of nCPAP for prevention of apnea, or after extubation, and sometimes in infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome treated without surfactant.
Demographic characteristics, antenatal data, birth characteristics and neonatal morbidities, non-invasive ventilation oxygen administration and HFNC, postnatal steroid therapy, total duration of hospital stay, will be collected from our electronic standardized patient record in which they are prospectively encoded.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses will be used to evaluate the difference of nCPAP therapy duration between Group 1 and Group 2 after adjustment on potential cofactors.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of oxygen therapy (expressed in days) in the population of very preterm infants.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The study aim to compare two periods, before and after HFNC implementation.
During the first period, in 2011, nCPAP (Infant FlowSiPAP) was used as a first-line non-invasive respiratory support.
During the second period, in 2014, the use of HFNC support was established as soon as it was possible instead of nCPAP for prevention of apnea, or after extubation, and sometimes in infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome treated without surfactant.
Demographic characteristics, antenatal data, birth characteristics and neonatal morbidities, non-invasive ventilation oxygen administration and HFNC, postnatal steroid therapy, total duration of hospital stay, will be collected from our electronic standardized patient record in which they are prospectively encoded.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses will be used to evaluate the difference of nCPAP therapy duration between Group 1 and Group 2 after adjustment on potential cofactors.
|
2 years
|
Duration of hospital stay (expressed in days) in the population of very preterm infants.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The study aim to compare two periods, before and after HFNC implementation.
During the first period, in 2011, nCPAP (Infant FlowSiPAP) was used as a first-line non-invasive respiratory support.
During the second period, in 2014, the use of HFNC support was established as soon as it was possible instead of nCPAP for prevention of apnea, or after extubation, and sometimes in infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome treated without surfactant.
Demographic characteristics, antenatal data, birth characteristics and neonatal morbidities, non-invasive ventilation oxygen administration and HFNC, postnatal steroid therapy, total duration of hospital stay, will be collected from our electronic standardized patient record in which they are prospectively encoded.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses will be used to evaluate the difference of nCPAP therapy duration between Group 1 and Group 2 after adjustment on potential cofactors.
|
2 years
|
Duration of exposure to nCPAP (expressed in days) in extremely preterm infants.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
It will be the same evaluation than in whole population, but in extremely preterm infants borm before 29 weeks gestational age.
|
2 years
|
The cost of use (expressed in Euros) of nCPAP and HFNC using two different devices.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Cost analysis will be carried out for the three devices: Infant Flow SiPAP, OptiFlow and Precision Flow, including all consumables.
To evaluate the costs these devices will be used as recommended by the manufacturers.The calculated costs will be based on an example of three devices in constant use on a 7-day cycle change of the circuits for the Opti-Flow device, and 30-day cycle change for Precision Flow device.
Actual costs will be expressed as price per patient per week.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HIFLO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prematurity; Extreme
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedExtreme PrematurityUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingPrematurity; ExtremeUnited States
-
Stockholm UniversityKarolinska Institutet; Region Stockholm; Centrum för kompetensutveckling inom... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Guilherme Sant'Anna, MDCompleted
-
Level 42 AI, Inc.Georgetown UniversityRecruitingPremature Birth | Prematurity | Premature Lungs | Prematurity; ExtremeUnited States
-
Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity Medical Center Groningen; UMC Utrecht; Erasmus Medical Center; Amsterdam... and other collaboratorsCompletedComplications | Extreme Prematurity
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingNewborn | Extreme Prematurity | Pretrm InfantsFrance
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)CompletedParent-Child Relations | Parents | Extreme PrematurityUnited States
-
Christiana Care Health ServicesProvidence Health & ServicesCompletedPregnancy Preterm | Birth, Preterm | Extreme PrematurityUnited States
Clinical Trials on High flow nasal cannula
-
Aga Khan University Hospital, PakistanUnknownApneic Oxygenation
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaUnknownPatient Population Submitted to ERCPSpain
-
Kuopio University HospitalCentral Finland Hospital District; Mikkeli Central Hospital; Siun soteRecruiting
-
Montefiore Medical CenterCompletedMorbid Obesity | Noninvasive Ventilation | Deep SedationUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterFisher and Paykel HealthcareNot yet recruitingAcute Respiratory FailureKorea, Republic of
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesCompletedHigh Flow Nasal CannulaUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRecruitingObesity, Morbid | Extubation FailureUnited States, Mexico
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
American University of Beirut Medical CenterRecruitingHigh-flow Nasal Cannula | Intravenous SedationLebanon