e-Mobile Tablet for People With Chronic Conditions

July 13, 2022 updated by: Matthew Plow, Case Western Reserve University

Examining the Usability of Computer Tablets to Promote Symptom Self-management and Engagement in Healthy Behaviors in Adults With Chronic Conditions

Maintaining a healthy diet and engaging in routine physical activity may help decrease severity of symptoms, prevent secondary conditions, and slow functional decline in people with disabling neuromusculoskeletal conditions. However, people with these conditions face many health barriers to engaging in healthy behaviors. With the advent of portable technologies, such as smart phones, tablets and PDAs, there is a need to explore whether these technologies can help people with disabling conditions to stay motivated and overcome barriers to engaging in healthy behaviors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this mixed methods, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled pilot study is to evaluate whether goal setting, self-monitoring, and barrier management using a computer tablet can increase physical activity behavior, improve nutritional habits, and promote health-related quality of life in people with disabling neuromusculoskeletal conditions. Our hypothesis is that, in comparison to the standard care contact control group, participants in both the tablet group and the paper and pencil group will yield significant improvements in healthy behaviors,with the tablet group yielding significantly larger increases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Case Western Reserve University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician-confirmed diagnosis of a neuro-musculoskeletal condition or disease of the nerves, muscles, and/or bones that results in functional limitations
  • Physician consent to engage in home exercise/physical activity program
  • Regularly inactive (i.e., engaging in 90 minutes or less of purposeful physical activity each week)
  • Scoring ≤17 mental composite and ≤16 physical composite on the Global Health Questionnaire.
  • Have internet access (i.e., home, library or other WiFi location)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the only disabling condition reported is not considered a neuro-musculoskeletal disease
  • Have hand-motor function impairments that would limit use of the tablet
  • Often engage in healthy eating habits
  • Are frequent fallers (i.e., more than 3 falls per month)
  • Have a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, serious mental health disorder, chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction, and other unstable/severe cardiovascular conditions, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (e.g., admission to the hospital within the past 6 months for uncontrolled diabetes)
  • Have severe cognitive deficits
  • Reports consistently tracking and monitoring health behaviors
  • Unable to effectively use the tablet technology during the pre-intervention usability demonstration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Computer Tablet Group
Participants will first meet once with a trained health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will work with the participant in setting constructive and manageable goals and how to achieve them safely. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss progression and/or possible trouble-shooting strategies. Participants will be asked to set goals related to increasing self managing health behaviors. Participants will be encouraged to self-monitor goals, behaviors and symptoms using a computer tablet.
A computer tablet application to set goals,self-monitor healthy behaviors, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-manage a problematic symptom.
Active Comparator: Paper and Pencil Group
Participants will first meet once with a trained health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will work with the participant in setting constructive and manageable goals and how to achieve them safely. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss progression and/or possible trouble-shooting strategies. Participants will be asked to set goals related to increasing self managing health behaviors. Participants will be encouraged to self-monitor goals, behaviors and symptoms using a paper-pencil diary.
Use of paper and pencil diaries and worksheets to set goals, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-monitor behaviors.
Active Comparator: Contact Control Group
Participants will first meet once with a health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will provide general information about engaging in healthy behaviors. Information will primarily focus on the benefits of engaging in healthy behaviors and safety precautions. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss various health topics.
Participants are prescribed an exercise program and given information on healthy eating.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity
Time Frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised was administered to assess physical activity behavior. Scores can range from -2.7493 to 3.3671. Higher scores on the Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised indicates increased physical activity levels.
Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function
Time Frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) was used to measure self-report physical function. Measures are scored on a T-score metric. High scores indicate more of the concept being measured. A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test
Time Frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Exercise Confidence Survey was used to measure self-efficacy. The survey asks about confidence in sticking to an exercise program and making time for exercise. This is a 12 item questionnaire and scores ranges from 1 to 60. A higher score indicates increased confidence to engage in exercise.
Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Changes From Baseline in Weight
Time Frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew A Plow, PhD, Case Western Reserve University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Computer Tablet Group

Subscribe