Addressing Hospital Patient Information Needs Using Information Technology

July 17, 2018 updated by: David Vawdrey, Columbia University

Addressing Hospital Patient Information Needs Using a Personal Health Record Portal

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an inpatient personal health record (PHR) portal intervention within the hospital environment. The intervention hopes to improve patient engagement with their care and to measure patient activation and satisfaction. Additional clinical measure (e.g. number of adverse events that occur during the stay, changes to medication orders, etc.) will also be studied. Characterization of hospital patient and clinician attitudes towards patient engagement will also be formalized.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will utilize an enhanced inpatient PHR portal to allow patients to view their care team, documented allergies and medications (home and hospital) as well as electronically document questions and concerns related to their care. These questions and concerns are visible to members of the patients' care teams within our commercial inpatient electronic health record (EHR). We will study the impact of the technology using a randomized trial of 426 cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery patients at Columbia University Medical Center in Upper Manhattan. We hypothesize that the use of the inpatient PHR portal will identify and address patients' information needs, improve patient activation, engagement and satisfaction, and encourage PHR use after hospital discharge. We also hypothesize that information entered by patients into the PHR portal will be useful to clinicians. There is no compensation for participating in this study.

The specific aims of the proposal are to:

Aim 1: Evaluate the impact of an inpatient PHR portal intervention using a randomized controlled trial. The primary outcomes will be patient activation, engagement and satisfaction. We will also determine whether access to the inpatient PHR portal is correlated with greater use of the PHR after hospital discharge.

Aim 2: Characterize information needs of hospital patients and assess clinicians' attitudes toward patient engagement in the hospital setting. We will analyze the questions and comments that patients record within the PHR portal application and assess the salience of patient-entered information to issues of care quality and safety. This aim will expand our previous work in taxonomy development and hazard and near-miss recognition. A survey will be administered to collect clinicians' perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of system use. EHR documentation will be reviewed to assess whether patient-entered information was acknowledged by clinicians, and whether changes were made to the patient's plan of care as a result.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

426

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Speaks English or Spanish
  • Admitted to unit where study is ongoing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not pass Mini-mental status exam

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard tablet computer
Patient will receive tablet computer within 18 hours of admission and will continue to have access to it for the rest of his/her stay. Tablet has typical applications including access to the internet and entertainment.
No special enhancements or links to personal health information.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients will receive usual care and will answer surveys during the usual time-frame specified.
Experimental: Enhanced tablet computer
Patients will receive a tablet computer within 18 hours of admission. Tablet will give access to a personalized inpatient personal health record portal. Will also provide access to standard tablet applications (e.g. video calling, streaming movies, etc.)
Tablet computer with personalized access to data from the patient's electronic health record.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient Activation Measure
Time Frame: Admission to Unit and 3-5 days after
The PAM assesses the knowledge, skills and confidence essential to managing one's own health and healthcare. It segments consumers into one of four progressively higher activation levels. The PAM score has been used to predict healthcare outcomes including medication adherence, ER utilization and hospitalization.
Admission to Unit and 3-5 days after

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3-5 days after admission to study
We will measure patient patient satisfaction using a survey instrument along with data obtained from EHR and PHR system logs. The Patient Survey instrument measures information needs, satisfaction, patient engagement, and system usefulness. It is derived from the 26-item Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire (Bakken, 2006)
3-5 days after admission to study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Vawdrey, PhD, Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAF0264
  • R01HS021816 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)
  • T15LM00707 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Library of Medicine)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inpatient

Clinical Trials on Standard tablet computer

3
Subscribe