Purastat® vs Standard Therapy for Haemostasis During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

June 21, 2018 updated by: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Purastat® to Standard Therapy for Haemostasis Control During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic resection technique used to treat superficial neoplasia in the gastrointestinal tract. Bleeding is a commonly encountered problem during submucosal dissection and is usually managed with electrocautery. However, this does carry a risk of deep thermal injury and perforation.

PuraStat® is a novel extracellular scaffold matrix of amino acids that forms a transparent adherent barrier when applied to a bleeding point.

The aim of this trial is to study the use of PuraStat® in reducing the need for thermal haemostasis during ESD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic technique that involves the use of an endoscopic knife to gently peel off a superficial neoplasia of any size in an en-bloc fashion. It meets the principles of onco-surgery and is associated with excellent outcomes. A difficulty however with the technique is control of bleeding during the procedure. The GI mucosa is a vascular territory and the current method of managing intraprocedural bleeding is electrocautery using either the endoscopic knife itself or the coag grasper. This introduces a thermal injury to the bowel wall and carries the risk of causing a perforation or causing pain. Furthermore, it requires precise targeting of the bleeding vessel. Practically this can be challenging, particularly if the coag grasper is needed which is a bulky device and can be difficult to apply precisely in some locations.

PuraStat® (3-D Matrix Ltd, Tokyo) is a liquid which is applied to a bleeding area which acts rapidly to form a gel coat which induces haemostasis. This transparent adherent barrier permits further endoscopic therapy to be performed. It can be applied in the general area of bleeding and does not require precise application to the exact point of bleeding. It is applied through a small catheter placed through the biopsy channel of the endoscope which can be used in very small spaces.

PuraStat® is licensed as a CE marked device for use in exudative haemorrhage from vessels in solid organs and within the GI tract. Given this indication, the role of PuraStat in ESD needs to be explored as it could reduce the need for thermal haemostasis. This would be of significant clinical benefit during ESD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom, PO6 3LY
        • Portsmputh Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • An ESD is attempted for clinical indications approved by MDT.
  • Oesophageal or colonic lesion 2-5cm in size
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known coagulopathy likely to affect risk of bleeding
  • Submucosal tumour
  • Anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy (apart from single modality aspirin or clopidogrel) which cannot be stopped for clinical reasons
  • Patient preference

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PuraStat®
Interventional arm: PuraStat® applied through a catheter delivery system via the endoscope is used to stop bleeding during ESD.
PuraStat® gel is applied through a safe catheter delivery system (via endoscope) over the bleeding point
Other: Standard Electrocautery
Control arm where standard electrocautery delivered via the endoscopic knife tip or coag grasper is used to achieve haemostasis during ESD
Electrocautery (coagulation current) to stop bleeding during ESD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The number of times intraprocedural heat therapy is used to achieve haemostasis in ESD in both the PuraStat® and control arms of the study
Time Frame: Measured during the ESD procedure
Measured during the ESD procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The length of the procedure in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame: Measured during the ESD procedure
Measured during the ESD procedure
The number of patients with delayed bleeding (bleeding within 28 days) in both the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Wound healing in the PuraStat® and control arm at 6 weeks post ESD
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Wound healing will be measured at endoscopy using qualitative descriptor categories (active ulceration, healing ulceration, scarring or complete mucosal healing). There is no standard definition to qualify ulcer healing post ESD but these categories have previously been used by Uraoka et al in a similar study published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Vol 83, No 6:2016.1259-1264).
6 weeks
Number of adverse events in the PuraStat® and control arm of the study
Time Frame: 14 months
14 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pradeep Bhandari, MBBS, MD, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage

Clinical Trials on PuraStat®

Subscribe