A CLinical Study to Evaluate the Safety And Effectiveness of the CeRene DevIce to Treat HeavY Menstrual Bleeding (CLARITY)

December 9, 2020 updated by: Channel Medsystems
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Cerene Cryotherapy Device in reducing menstrual bleeding in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) due to benign causes for whom child bearing is complete.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

242

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2J 7G9
        • Allan Centre
    • Quebec
      • Lasalle, Quebec, Canada, H8P 1C1
        • LaSalle Hospital
    • Nuevo Leon
      • Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 66460
        • Hospital Universitario de la Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
    • Illinois
      • Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States, 60004
        • WomanCare PC
      • Naperville, Illinois, United States, 60540
        • The Advance Gynecologic Surgery Institute
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
        • Women's Health Advantage
      • Newburgh, Indiana, United States, 47630
        • Basinski LLC
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28801
        • Asheville Women's Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45231
        • Seven Hills Women's Health
      • Mason, Ohio, United States, 45040
        • Amy Brenner MD and Associates, LLC
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202
        • Premier Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Refractory heavy menstrual bleeding with no definable organic cause
  • Female subject age 25 to 50 years, inclusive
  • Sounded length of uterine cavity no greater than 10 cm and endometrial cavity no greater than 6.5 cm
  • Sufficient myometrial thickness
  • Documented excessive menstrual blood loss within 3 months of informed consent
  • Premenopausal confirmed by follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measurement
  • Agrees to use a reliable form of contraception following ablation treatment
  • Provides written informed consent using a form that has been approved by the reviewing ethics committee
  • Agrees to follow-up exams and data collection requirements
  • Demonstrates an understanding of how to record menstrual blood loss using a menstrual pictogram
  • Has predictable, cyclic menstrual cycles

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or has a desire to conceive
  • Endometrial hyperplasia as confirmed by histology
  • Active endometritis
  • Active pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Active sexually transmitted disease (STD)
  • Presence of bacteremia, sepsis, or other active systemic infection
  • Active infection of the genitals, vagina, cervix, or uterus
  • Known/suspected abdominal, pelvic, or gynecological malignancy within the past 5 years
  • Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders
  • Abnormal cytology on Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing not treated according to local standards.
  • Prior uterine surgery that interrupts the integrity of the uterine wall (e.g., transmural myomectomy or classical cesarean section).
  • Previous low transverse cesarean section where the myometrial wall thickness is insufficient
  • Previous endometrial ablation procedure
  • Clinically significant adenomyosis indicated by subject complaints, imaging, or clinician's judgment
  • Presence of an implantable contraceptive device
  • Currently on medications that could thin the myometrial muscle
  • Currently on anticoagulants
  • Abnormal or obstructed cavity
  • Currently using an intrauterine device (IUD) and unwilling to remove the IUD
  • Post-partum ≤ 6-months
  • Considering participation in a research study of an investigational drug or device that would begin during the course of this investigational study
  • Any general health or mental, or other situation or condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could represent an increased risk for the subject or impact the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Endometrial Cryoablation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety Endpoint: Number of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Device-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Subjects With Reduction in Menstrual Bleeding to PBLAC Score of ≤75
Time Frame: 12 months

Success for the primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as reduction in menstrual bleeding to a PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart) score of ≤75.

Scale information for PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart):

The scale minimum is 0, which indicates amenorrhea, i.e. no bleeding. There is no scale maximum. A score of 100 indicates eumenorrhea, i.e. normal menstrual bleeding. A lower PBLAC score indicates less bleeding; a higher PBLAC score indicates more bleeding.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysmennorhea
Time Frame: 12 Months
Subjects were queried regarding if they suffer from dysmenorrhea (painful cramping associated with menstruation). The subject was asked to rate their level of dysmenorrhea on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 5 indicating very severe symptoms. A score of 0 was considered better than a score of 5.
12 Months
Amenorrhea
Time Frame: 12 Months

Pictorial blood loss assessment (PBLAC) score = 0

Scale information for PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart):

The scale minimum is 0, which indicates amenorrhea, i.e. no bleeding. There is no scale maximum. A score of 100 indicates eumenorrhea, i.e. normal menstrual bleeding. A lower PBLAC score indicates less bleeding; a higher PBLAC score indicates more bleeding.

12 Months
Investigator Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity
Time Frame: 12 Months
12 Months
Investigator Assessment of Cavity Findings
Time Frame: 12 Months
Questions to the investigator
12 Months
Anesthesia and Pain Medications at Treatment
Time Frame: Day of Treatment
Day of Treatment
Subject Rating of Pain During Treatment and Day One Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Day of Treatment and Day One Post-Treatment
Pain rating using numeric rating scale, minimum 0, maximum 10, with 0 designated as no pain and 10 designated as the worst pain.
Day of Treatment and Day One Post-Treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjects' Report of Their Last Menstrual Period
Time Frame: 36 months
Subjects were asked to describe their last menstrual period
36 months
Menstrual Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: 36 months
Subjects' Report of Activity Limitations
36 months
Premenstrual Symptoms Impact Survey
Time Frame: 36 months
Subjects' Report of Pre-Menstrual Symptoms (PMS)
36 months
Subject Satisfaction
Time Frame: 36 Months
Subject's level of satisfaction with the results of her Cerene treatment
36 Months
Subject Recommendation
Time Frame: 36 months
Subjects' reported level of recommendation to a friend/family
36 months
Procedure Time
Time Frame: Day of Treatment
Device insertion to device removal
Day of Treatment
Return to Normal Daily Activities
Time Frame: Two-Weeks
Two-Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Menorrhagia

Clinical Trials on Cerene(R) Cryotherapy Device

3
Subscribe