Listening to Mom in the NICU: Neural, Clinical and Language Outcomes

October 27, 2021 updated by: Katherine E Travis, PhD, Stanford University

Listening to Mom in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): Neural, Clinical and Language Outcomes

The purpose of this study is to examine whether playing recordings of a mother's voice to her infant while in the hospital nursery is an effective treatment for promoting healthy brain and language development in infants born preterm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Children born preterm are at-risk for developmental language delays. Language problems in preterm children are thought to be related to neurobiological factors, including injuries to white matter structures of the brain and environmental factors, including decreased exposure to maternal speech in the hospital nursery. There is evidence to suggest that maternal speech input may be important for promoting healthy brain and language development.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups. Each infant has a 50% chance of being assigned to the group that will listen to a recording of his/her mother's voice and a 50% chance of being assigned to the group that will not be played a voice recording. Mother's of participating infants will have her voice recorded as she reads a common children's storybook. Recordings will be played to infants each day until s/he is discharged from the hospital. Participation in this study requires that all infants receive up to an additional 10 minutes of brain scans as part of his/her routine clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford University - Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants born preterm at Stanford Children's Hospital between 27 0/7 - 31 6/7 weeks gestational age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital anomalies
  • Recognizable malformation syndromes
  • Active seizure disorders
  • History of Central Nervous System infections
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Major sensori-neural hearing loss
  • Likelihood to be transferred from NICU to alternate care facility or home environment prior to 36 weeks PMA
  • Intraventricular Hemorrhage Grades III-IV
  • Cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)
  • Surgical treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis
  • Small for gestational age (SGA) <3 percentile and/or Intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) no head sparing
  • Twin-to-twin transfusions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Language Treatment Arm
An infant participant randomized to the language treatment arm will be played recordings of his/her mother's voice 2-3 hours daily in the intermediate care nursery until discharge.
Recording of a mother's voice reading a children's storybook.
Sham Comparator: Control Treatment Arm
An infant participant randomized to the control treatment arm will receive standard of care. Standard of care does not include being played recordings of his/her mother's voice while admitted to the intermediate care nursery. However, an infant randomized to the control treatment will have the same auditory equipment placed in his/her isolette or crib as an infant randomized to the Language Treatment Arm.
Standard of Care
Other Names:
  • Standard of Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
White matter mean diffusivity
Time Frame: 36-37 weeks post-menstrual age or at time of hospital discharge, whichever comes first
Mean diffusivity measures the average rate of water diffusion within a given MRI voxel.
36-37 weeks post-menstrual age or at time of hospital discharge, whichever comes first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time (days) to full oral feed
Time Frame: measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA
days until 100 % of nutrition administered orally
measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Days in hospital since birth and until discharge, average range is 37-40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA)
Days in hospital since birth and until discharge
Days in hospital since birth and until discharge, average range is 37-40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA)
Average daily weight gain
Time Frame: measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA
measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA
Number of significant apnea and bradycardia events requiring stimulation
Time Frame: measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA
measured daily and beginning at start of treatment and until end of treatment, approximately 37-40 weeks PMA

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine E Travis, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth

Clinical Trials on Language Treatment

Subscribe