Chemotherapy-related Toxicity, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life

July 25, 2016 updated by: University Clinical Centre, Gdansk

Chemotherapy-related Toxicity, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Precachectic Oncologic Patients With or Without High Protein Nutritional Support. A Prospective, Randomized Study

Determine whether nutritional support with high protein ONS in adult oncologic patients in the first step of cancer cachexia - asymptomatic precachexia, influence on the toxicity of systemic therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Other endpoints:

  • to determine whether high protein ONS influence on the nutritional status
  • to determine whether high protein ONS influence on the quality of life
  • to determine whether high protein ONS influence on the performance status
  • to determine high protein ONS tolerability / ONS intake compliance

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gdansk, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • University Clinical Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sylwia Malgorzewicz, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histological confirmed diagnosis of CRC in clinical stage IV
  • successful qualification to chemotherapy
  • performance status at least 80% according to Karnofsky scale and <2 according to WHO/ECOG scale
  • cancer-related asymptomatic precachexia diagnosed
  • absence of contraindications to oral nutrition and practicable realization of oral nutrition
  • absence of severe, decompensated concomitant diseases
  • signed informed consent for the participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of a malignant neoplasm in clinical stage I-III
  • disqualification from oncologic treatment
  • cancer cachexia or cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome
  • poor performance status
  • contraindications to oral nutrition or to high protein nutrition
  • regular nutritional support at the moment of qualification to the study
  • patient incompliance at the moment of qualification to the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: NUTRIDRINK Compact Protein
NUTRIDRINK Compact Protein Oral nutritional supplement Dietary advice
high-energy, high-protein, oral liquid nutritional supplement; dosage: 2x125 ml per day, 7 days per week for 12 weeks (3 months)
Other Names:
  • Oral nutritional supplement
NO_INTERVENTION: without oral nutritional supplements
Dietary advice alone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chemotherapy-related toxicity during 12th week of observation
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12th week
graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE Version 4.0); to determine whether nutritional support with high protein ONS in adult oncologic patients in the first step of cancer cachexia - asymptomatic precachexia, influence on the toxicity of systemic therapy during 3 months observation period (comparison of the results at the baseline and after 12 weeks)
at baseline and after 12th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Nutritional status / metabolic status
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12th week

the assessment according to Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), body mass, body mass index (BMI), VAS for appetite, albumin, prealbumin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, complete blood count.

Body mass (in kg) will measure by the scales (Tanita BC 420). Hight ( in cm) measure by Stadiometer (Tanita)

Body mass index calculation (BMI) on the basis of the following formula:

BMI = body weight / height2 (kg/m2).

VAS for appetite is 100-mm line where 0 mm means "I had no appetite at all" and 100 mm means "My appetite was very good".

Laboratory parameters will measured by routine laboratory methods. All results will be compared between study groups (ONS vs without ONS) at the same time point (eg. baseline group ONS vs baseline group without ONS)

at baseline and after 12th week
Changes in the Quality of life and patients well-being
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12th week

FAACT-ESPEN score Version 4 (Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy questionnaire) is a measure of the quality of life and it is completed by a patient, it has a total of 42 questions. Patients mark 0 (none) - 4 (very much) for each question. This tool consists of five subscales: functional well-being (7 items), physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items) and other aspects, including appetite (13 items).

The maximum score is 168. The lower the score, the lower overall quality of life.

at baseline and after 12th week
Changes in the Performance status
Time Frame: at baseline and after 12th week

To performance status assessment will be used Kornofsky scale and ECOG scale. The Karnofsky score allows to quantify the overall state and quality of life of a patient with neoplastic disease who qualifies to receive chemotherapy. The score has a range from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the ideal state and 0 - death.

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) score runs from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 death.

at baseline and after 12th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylwia Malgorzewicz, MD, PhD, University Clinical Centre, Gdansk, Poland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01/2014/UCK

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

publication in nutritional and oncological journals, presentation on the congresses

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on NUTRIDRINK Compact Protein

Subscribe