COMRADE: Collaborative Care Management for Distress and Depression in Rural Diabetes (COMRADE)

March 10, 2023 updated by: Doyle M. Cummings, East Carolina University
The study will implement and evaluate, using a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial, a unique collaborative, stepped-care intervention for patients with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes and co-morbid distress and/or depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators plan to implement and evaluate, using a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial, a unique collaborative, stepped-care intervention for patients with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes and co-morbid distress and/or depression. The investigators approach will combine practice-based medical and cognitive behavioral treatment with strong community-based support to immediately place the patient at the right level of intervention based on disease and severity and to step-up treatment intensity and follow-up if the initial response is inadequate. The practice-based component will use a care manager linked to medical, pharmacologic, and behavioral colleagues. The community based component will utilize community health workers to provide support and facilitate access to resources. Goals include: 1) implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of this intervention; 2) examining the impact of this approach on psychological mediators of improved glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c); and 3) building, sustaining, and disseminating a cost-effective care model.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • East Carolina University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  2. Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 7.0 = Uncontrolled
  3. Positive score on diabetes related distress 2 question screener and/or
  4. Positive score on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) 2 question screener

Exclusion Criteria: a diagnosis [from billing records using International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition (ICD-9) codes] of:

  1. advanced disease (e.g., end stage renal disease, advanced heart failure, blindness, metastatic cancer and including those who are in active treatment for cancer), or
  2. alcoholism or
  3. cognitive impairment, or
  4. major psychiatric disease or
  5. any type of physical or mental impairment that would preclude active participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients receive usual care
Experimental: Integrated Behavioral Intervention
Patients receive intensive behavioral counseling that may include elements of cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving therapy, and small changes lifestyle counseling in addition to medical care.
Patients receive intensive behavioral counseling that may include elements of cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving therapy, and small changes lifestyle counseling in addition to medical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (%)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change from baseline in HbA1c or glycosylated hemoglobin (%)
Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Diabetes Regimen-Related Distress
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Diabetes regimen-related distress is a measure of the emotional response to having and managing diabetes and is measured by a subscale of 5 items (#5, 6, 10, 12, 16) from the Diabetes-related Distress instrument (DDS-17). Each item is rated from 1 (not a problem) - 6 (very serious problem) and therefore the total score for this sub-score ranges from 5 - 30. The mean score for an individual can be computed as the sum of the 5 items divided by 5. For this study outcome, the investigators computed the average change (increase or decrease) in the mean RRD score from baseline to 12-mo. follow-up.
Baseline to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diabetes Self-care Activities
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Diabetes self-care activities as measured by the Self-reported Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA) instrument. The SDSCA is a questionnaire which assesses levels of self-care in adults with diabetes. The tool contains 11 items, which measure the frequency of performing diabetes self-care activities over the last seven days including diet, exercise, blood glucose testing, foot care and tobacco use. The respondent marks the number of days on which the indicated behavior was performed on an eight-point Likert scale (0 - 7) to answer the questions. The first ten items are summed to a total score. The eleventh item focuses on smoking habits and assesses the average number of cigarettes smoked per day. For the present study, the total score was summed and divided by 11 items to create a mean score and then the average change from baseline to 12 month follow-up.
Baseline to 12 months
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months

Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) instrument for depressive symptoms. Diagnosis based on Total PHQ-9 Score; Interpretation:

Minimal depression 0-4 Mild depression 5-9 Moderate depression 10-14 Moderately severe depression 15-19 Severe depression 20-27

Baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

August 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Integrated Behavioral Care

Subscribe