- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02868034
Optimization of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Protocols
Optimization of Spinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT) Protocols
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly condition. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common mind body intervention for individuals with LBP. Although SMT for LBP has been examined in numerous clinical studies, the literature on SMT remains unclear and even contradictory as to the effectiveness of this treatment. Studies that have supported SMT have generally found relatively small treatment effects. Many reasons have been offered for the inconsistent research literature and small effect sizes of SMT. A primary rationale offered is that the SMT protocols used in clinical research are not optimal, primarily due to a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms explaining the clinical benefits of SMT realized by some patients with LBP.
The prior work of this research team has identified two mechanisms explaining the therapeutic effects of SMT. These effects are a reduction in spinal stiffness and improved activation of the lumbar multifidus muscle. This research has also developed accurate, non-invasive methods to measure these effects and their response to SMT. The model identifying these two mechanisms has been validated in a second patient sample.
The overall goal of this proposal is to optimize SMT treatment protocols for patients with LBP. The optimization strategy in this study will evaluate SMT combined with other treatments known to modulate the same signals that underlie the clinical effects of SMT assessing both mechanistic (stiffness, lumbar multifidus activation) and patient-centered (function and pain) outcomes. This project will use innovative methodology to efficiently evaluate the effects of various individual treatment components towards an overall effect; identifying which components are contributing to the target outcomes and which, if any, may be discarded. All participants will be provided 2 sessions of SMT, and then will be randomized to a treatment group for an additional 3 weeks using a factorial design and stratified by responder status in order to evaluate different combinations of intervention components (muscle activation exercise, spinal mobilizing exercise, additional SMT) that work on the same pathways that modulate the same effects (spinal stiffness and muscle activation). Outcomes will include spinal stiffness and muscle activation measures as well as patient-reported outcomes assessed at baseline, and after 1 week, 4 weeks and 3 months. Results of this project will provide optimized SMT protocols that will be ready for application in future randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- University of Alberta
-
-
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
I. Pain between the 12th rib and buttocks with or without symptoms into one or both legs, which, in the opinion of the examiner, originate from the lumbar region.
II. Age 18 - 60 years
III. Oswestry disability score > 20%
Exclusion Criteria:
I. Prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine
II. Currently pregnant
III. Currently receiving mind-body or exercise treatment for LBP from a healthcare provider (e.g., chiropractic, physical therapy, massage therapy, etc.)
IV. Neurogenic signs including any of the following: positive ipsi- or contra-lateral straight leg raise test; reflex, sensory, or strength deficit in a pattern consistent with lumbar nerve root compression
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SMT Only
Patients receive 2 sessions on SMT during week 1, no additional treatment.
|
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: SMT extended
2 sessions of SMT in week 1 and 6 additional sessions of SMT during weeks 2-4.
|
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
This treatment involves 6 additional SMT sessions.
Each SMT session is conducted as described previously.
|
|
Experimental: SMT with Activation Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1 and 6 additional sessions of lumbar multifidus activating exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
Activation exercises are designed to facilitate use of the lumbar multifidus muscle.
Exercises will begin with isometric multifidus contractions in different positions with clinician feedback and exercises to isometrically co-contract the multifidus and deep abdominal muscles.
Subjects will also perform lumbar extensor strengthening exercises shown to produce 20%-50% of multifidus maximum voluntary contraction.
Subjects will continue to perform isometric exercises throughout treatment.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: SMT with Mobilizing Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1; 6 sessions of spinal mobilizing exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
Mobilizing exercises will include a program of repeated movements progressing into end-ranges of spinal flexion and/or extension shown in past studies to improve ROM and reduce spinal stiffness.
Patients will be instructed in mid-range exercises and will be further assessed for a directional preference.
A directional preference is present if movement in a particular direction decreases LBP intensity or causes symptoms to centralize towards the midline.
If a subject has a directional preference he or she will be prescribed exercises specifically in that direction along with mid-range exercise.
Otherwise the subject will be assigned exercises moving into either flexion or extension based on the clinician's discretion.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
|
|
Experimental: SMT with Mobilizing and Activation Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1; 6 sessions of lumbar multifidus activating exercises and spinal mobilizing exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
Activation exercises are designed to facilitate use of the lumbar multifidus muscle.
Exercises will begin with isometric multifidus contractions in different positions with clinician feedback and exercises to isometrically co-contract the multifidus and deep abdominal muscles.
Subjects will also perform lumbar extensor strengthening exercises shown to produce 20%-50% of multifidus maximum voluntary contraction.
Subjects will continue to perform isometric exercises throughout treatment.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
Mobilizing exercises will include a program of repeated movements progressing into end-ranges of spinal flexion and/or extension shown in past studies to improve ROM and reduce spinal stiffness.
Patients will be instructed in mid-range exercises and will be further assessed for a directional preference.
A directional preference is present if movement in a particular direction decreases LBP intensity or causes symptoms to centralize towards the midline.
If a subject has a directional preference he or she will be prescribed exercises specifically in that direction along with mid-range exercise.
Otherwise the subject will be assigned exercises moving into either flexion or extension based on the clinician's discretion.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
|
|
Experimental: SMT extended with Mobilizing Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1; 6 sessions of SMT and spinal mobilizing exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
This treatment involves 6 additional SMT sessions.
Each SMT session is conducted as described previously.
Mobilizing exercises will include a program of repeated movements progressing into end-ranges of spinal flexion and/or extension shown in past studies to improve ROM and reduce spinal stiffness.
Patients will be instructed in mid-range exercises and will be further assessed for a directional preference.
A directional preference is present if movement in a particular direction decreases LBP intensity or causes symptoms to centralize towards the midline.
If a subject has a directional preference he or she will be prescribed exercises specifically in that direction along with mid-range exercise.
Otherwise the subject will be assigned exercises moving into either flexion or extension based on the clinician's discretion.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
|
|
Experimental: SMT extended with Activation Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1; 6 sessions of SMT and lumbar multifidus activating exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
Activation exercises are designed to facilitate use of the lumbar multifidus muscle.
Exercises will begin with isometric multifidus contractions in different positions with clinician feedback and exercises to isometrically co-contract the multifidus and deep abdominal muscles.
Subjects will also perform lumbar extensor strengthening exercises shown to produce 20%-50% of multifidus maximum voluntary contraction.
Subjects will continue to perform isometric exercises throughout treatment.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
This treatment involves 6 additional SMT sessions.
Each SMT session is conducted as described previously.
|
|
Experimental: SMT extended with Activation and Mobilizing Exercises
2 sessions of SMT during week 1; 6 sessions of SMT, multifidus activating and spinal mobilizing exercises during weeks 2-4.
|
Activation exercises are designed to facilitate use of the lumbar multifidus muscle.
Exercises will begin with isometric multifidus contractions in different positions with clinician feedback and exercises to isometrically co-contract the multifidus and deep abdominal muscles.
Subjects will also perform lumbar extensor strengthening exercises shown to produce 20%-50% of multifidus maximum voluntary contraction.
Subjects will continue to perform isometric exercises throughout treatment.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
All patients receive 2 SMT sessions in the first week.
The subject is supine.
The clinician stands opposite the side to be manipulated and side-bends the subject away from the side to manipulate.
The side to be manipulated is the more painful.
If the subject cannot identify a more painful side the clinician selects a side.
The clinician rotates the subject, and delivers a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust to the pelvis in a posterior/inferior direction.
The clinician notes if a cavitation (ie, a "pop") occurred.
If it does, SMT treatment is complete.
If no cavitation occurs, the subject is repositioned and SMT is performed again.
If no cavitation occurs on the second attempt, the clinician manipulates the opposite side.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side is permitted.
If no cavitation is noted by that time, SMT treatment is complete.
Substitution with a side-posture HVLA technique is allowed if the preferred technique is not possible due to subject preference or comfort.
Other Names:
This treatment involves 6 additional SMT sessions.
Each SMT session is conducted as described previously.
Mobilizing exercises will include a program of repeated movements progressing into end-ranges of spinal flexion and/or extension shown in past studies to improve ROM and reduce spinal stiffness.
Patients will be instructed in mid-range exercises and will be further assessed for a directional preference.
A directional preference is present if movement in a particular direction decreases LBP intensity or causes symptoms to centralize towards the midline.
If a subject has a directional preference he or she will be prescribed exercises specifically in that direction along with mid-range exercise.
Otherwise the subject will be assigned exercises moving into either flexion or extension based on the clinician's discretion.
Subjects will perform their prescribed exercises at treatment sessions and will be instructed to perform the exercises daily on other days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Stiffness
Time Frame: Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
Spinal stiffness is assessed with the VerteTrack device that applies a vertical load along the lumbar spine of a prone participant.
The indenter houses a sensor to provide continuous, real-time quantification of spinal deformation in response to a defined load.
Stiffness was determined as the ratio of the maximum applied force to the resultant displacement in N/mm.
Higher numbers indicate greater amounts of stiffness.
|
Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
|
Multifidus Activation
Time Frame: Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
Multifidus activation was measured with brightness-mode ultrasound images using a 60mm, 2-5 MHz curvilinear array.
Images are acquired with the multifidus at rest and during submaximal contraction.
Three images in each state are acquired and averaged.
Muscle activation is calculated as the change in thickness at rest and submaximal contraction and expressed as a percentage change.
Greater numbers indicate higher muscle activation.
|
Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
The Oswestry Disability Index measures back pain-related disability.
The scale contains 10 items with a minimum score of zero and maximum score of 100.
Higher numbers indicate more disability.
There are no subscales.
|
Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
A 0-10 numeric pain rating is used to assess pain intensity.
The minimum score is zero, maximum score is 10.
Higher numbers indicate greater pain intensity.
There are no subscales.
|
Assessed at Phase II Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks. 4 weeks and 12 weeks reported. Phase II baseline values were constrained to be equal to a common overall mean for analyses.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Julie M Fritz, PhD, PT, University of Utah
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1UH3AT009293-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityIstinye UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, PosturalTurkey
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai...CompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Non-specific Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain (LBP)Japan
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
Clinical Trials on Activation Exercises
-
University of Southern CaliforniaTerminatedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Christiana Care Health ServicesCompletedAbdominal MusclesUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingDiastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA)Pakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedWeakness, Muscle | SIJ - Sprain of Sacroiliac Joint | Tightness of Back MusclesPakistan
-
University of UtahTerminatedLow Back Pain | Opioid UseUnited States
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingInnominate Upslip Suprapubic DysfunctionPakistan
-
October 6 UniversityCompletedForward Head Posture | Non Specific Neck PainEgypt