The Impact of Two Strategies in the Monitoring of Exudative ARMD on the Visual Acuity (by OCT B Scan or OCT Angiography) (REPERM-OCT)

The treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is a major issue of public health. The therapeutic arsenal has widely grown throughout the years with the emergence of intra-vitreous anti-angiogenic treatments, under different surveillance protocols. The "PRN" surveillance (pro re nata: an on-demand treatment with monthly follow-up) allows a faster re-injection in case of neovascular relapse in order to maintain the best visual acuity. This therapeutic protocol is guided by the sub-retinal neovascular signs of activity. The monitoring is done during common practice via OCT B scans showing indirect signs of neovascular activity (exudation signs). OCT retinal imaging has been recently enriched with new programs allowing the visualization of sub-retinal neovessels without the use dyes (OCT angiography). The OCT angiography is automatically done by a program using standard OCT sections. During the monitoring of a patient using the OCT A, the signs of renewed neovascular activity are represented by an "arterialization" or the development of an arteriole network of the neovessel with the reappearance of a hyper reflective flow after a neovascular regressive phase. Indeed, the visualization of neovessels during the monitoring by Angio-OCT may lead to therapeutical modifications (anticipation of the injections). Knowing that the injection time-table of ARMD patients treated with anti-angiogenics is determined by sub-retinal neovascular signs of activity. This activity is evaluated during routine clinical practice by very specific signs, observable on OCT B scans. The hypothesis of this study is that the search of activity sins on the Angio-OCT, a new technic of image analysis performed on the OCT, may modify this injection time-table, with an impact of the patient's visual acuity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rotchschild

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient ≥ 50 years old
  • with exudative ARMD,
  • treated with intra-vitreous anti-angiogenics following a PRN protocol (pro re nata)
  • Absence of atrophy of the central pigment epithelium

Exclusion Criteria

  • Opposition to participate in this research
  • Persons enjoying legal protection measure
  • Lack of affiliation to social security and universal health coverage
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Another cause of Choroidal neovascularization
  • Unbalanced glaucoma
  • Eye surgery less than 3 months on the studied eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tested patients
Patients treated with anti-angiogenics for ARMD : monitoring using optical coherence tomography angiography
Active Comparator: Control patients
Patients treated with anti-angiogenics for ARMD : monitoring during common practice via optical coherence tomography B scans

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity improvement or stabilization
Time Frame: Between the inclusion and 1 year of follow-up
Proportion of patients with visual acuity improvement or stabilization
Between the inclusion and 1 year of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

August 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on OCT angiography

Subscribe