Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy Patients

February 28, 2019 updated by: Katherine Smith, The Cleveland Clinic

The Effect of Intraoperative Contact Sonography on Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy

This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

In full acknowledgement of the correlation between complete leiomyoma exeresis and symptom relief, the investigators hypothesize that use of contact ultrasonography at the time of laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will enable improved identification and extraction of uterine fibroids which will, in turn, lead to a greater improvement in quality of life among those women who receive intraoperative ultrasound compared to those who do not. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators will augment traditional laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy with intraoperative ultrasound in half the symptomatic patients enrolled in the study. The other half will be randomized to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy without use of intra-operative ultrasound. Both groups will complete Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS- QOL) questionnaires before and after surgery (6 months post procedure) to determine whether use of laparoscopic contact ultrasonography has a positive impact on patients' quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
        • Cleveland Clinic Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Premenopausal and nonpregnant
  2. Advised to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy by their provider
  3. Documented imaging with transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic MRI within the past year, which accurately and within reason documents the location and number of leiomyomas present within the uterus
  4. If deemed necessary by the provider, must have a pelvic MRI prior to surgery that states there are no concerning findings for malignancy
  5. Must be eligible to undergo laparoscopic surgery and willing to present for clinic and imaging follow up during the 6 months following myomectomy
  6. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Appearance of uterus concerning for malignancy on pelvic MRI
  2. Current pregnancy
  3. Any contraindication to laparoscopic or robotic surgery
  4. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs in the past 36 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Without Ultrasound
Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed without aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography
Experimental: With Ultrasound
Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed with aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography
In patients randomized to myomectomy with contact ultrasonography, the laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound probe will be advanced through an existing port site into the pelvis after traditional myomectomy has been performed. The face of the ultrasound transducer will be guided over the uterus (including open hysterotomy sites) in systematic strokes, taking special care to note locations of myomas that may have been missed by the preceding excision. Additional hysterotomy sites will be made as necessary in order to remove persistent myomas. Any number of additional ultrasound passes and excisions may be performed in order to achieve the most comprehensive removal of myomas.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery
Symptom and health-related quality of life will be measured by The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire administered to all study participants before myomectomy and 6 months post-myomectomy.
Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operating Time
Time Frame: Measured at surgery
Operating time is defined as the total period of time from when the procedure starts until the procedure is deemed complete.
Measured at surgery
Blood Loss
Time Frame: Measured at surgery
Blood loss (in mL) will be estimated for all procedures by the primary surgeon and gleaned from the anesthesia operative flowsheet.
Measured at surgery
Weight of Excised Myomas
Time Frame: Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation.
After extraction, all myomas will be submitted to pathology. Their cumulative weight will be measured by the Pathologist and gleaned by the research team from the final pathology report.
Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen E Zimberg, MD, Cleveland Clinic Florida
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine A Smith, MD, Cleveland Clinic Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Selected de-identified ultrasound images and surgical data will be shared with BK Ultrasound, the manufacturer of the ultrasound device.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative contact ultrasonography

Subscribe