Management of Postoperative Pain With Preemptive Analgesia in Cesarean Section

August 22, 2016 updated by: Mark Kosanovich
This research will explore the question of whether preincisional skin infiltration with bupivacaine 0.25% decreases postoperative pain after Cesarean delivery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Labor and delivery is a time of intense pain, often influenced by the psychological, emotional, social, cultural, and physical state of the parturient. Nowadays, delivery by Cesarean section is becoming more frequent. Females undergoing Cesarean section often wish to be awake postoperatively and to avoid excessive medications that will affect interactions with their newborn infant and visitors. However, Cesarean delivery is often associated with severe pain, requiring a well-planned analgesia regimen to ensure adequate patient comfort and satisfaction, early mobilization, and to decrease the hospital stay. An analgesic regimen may often include multiple doses of IV NSAIDs and opioids to adequately control the pain, and these costs add to the expenses of the hospital stay. Therefore, any intervention that leads to improvement in pain relief is worthy of investigation. Subcutaneous administration of local anesthetics can be a method of postoperative pain control after Cesarean section. Bupivacaine, a widely used local anesthetic, has been studied extensively in the past for the management of postoperative pain. The postoperative analgesic effects of subcutaneous wound infiltration prior to incision with bupivacaine have not been extensively studied in Cesarean delivery; hence, there may be a role in the management of pain relief when bupivacaine is administered at a specific time in surgery. Therefore, the present study is designed to assess the effect of preincisional skin infiltration with bupivacaine 0.25% versus placebo on postoperative pain relief after Cesarean delivery. 120 pregnant patients are randomized by means of the Drug Randomization Protocol (see below). The two groups are (A) control group in which preoperative wound infiltration with 10ml of 0.9% preservative-free normal saline is administered; and (B) in which preoperative wound infiltration with 10ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered. The primary end-point is postoperative pain. On arrival to the recovery room, pain intensity at rest is assessed by visual analogous scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and then 15, 30, 60 minutes and then 120 minutes after arrival in the recovery room.

Drug Randomization Protocol - All surgical staff is blinded to the study drug contents. A randomization checklist created by the Mercy biostatistician will be given to the scrub technician with a randomly generated list of 1s (saline) and 2s (bupivicaine) indicating the study drug to be administered. The scrub technician will assign a study drug to each patient as they arrive sequentially following the Study Randomization Checklist. The pharmacist will have the master list, indicating the contents of study drug 1 and 2. The scrub technician will order the study drug from the pharmacist by study name and number, eg. "Kathy Tom's study, drug 1." The pharmacist will be instructed not to indicate what the contents of the study related drug to the scrub technician or surgical staff and will send the drug up in a syringe labeled "Kathy Tom Study - Drug #" with all drug descriptive labeling covered.

The Study Randomization Checklist indicates the sequential participant number assigned to the patient on study entry, the corresponding study drug to be administered with a check box to indicate that the drug has been successfully administered (the box will not be checked if ordered and not administered), a column to record the date that the study drug has been administered, a column surgical to record the technician's initials that requested the study drug, and the medical record number of the patient. Sufficient information is included on the checklist to connect the study drug back to the patient if it becomes necessary.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
        • Recruiting
        • Mercy Hospital & Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Kosanovich, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult pregnant women to age 45 with scheduled cesarean sections at Mercy Hospital and Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergent cesarean sections and subjects with contraindications to bupivacaine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Control
pre-operative wound infiltration with 10 ml of sterile water
Experimental: bupivacaine
Intervention
pre-operative wound infiltration with 10 ml of numbing medicine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Final score on the visual analogous scale
Time Frame: 120 minutes after arrival in the recovery room
120 minutes after arrival in the recovery room

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Additional amount of analgesia provided patient as part of routine care
Time Frame: Post 120 minutes after arrival in the recovery room
Post 120 minutes after arrival in the recovery room

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rohitkumar Vasa, MD, IRB Chair

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe