Dorsal Versus Volar Approach for CapFlex-PIP© Implantation

June 15, 2017 updated by: Miriam Marks

Dorsal Versus Volar Approach for CapFlex-PIP© Implantation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The primary objective is to investigate the active extension six months after implantation of the CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty, comparing the dorsal with the volar approach.

This is a randomized controlled trial including 70 patients with PIP OA indicated for CapFlex arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The CapFlex-PIP© implant is a modular gliding surface proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint prosthesis. For implantation, there are two approaches available: The dorsal central split approach according to Swanson and the volar approach described by Simmen.

Our experiences and data from our prospective registry indicate, that the active extension of the PIP joint is better after the dorsal approach, but sometimes related with hyperextension of the PIP joint and secondary swan-neck deformity. Extension is supposed to be better after the volar approach, but associated with active and passive extension lag. Evidence of theses experiences will assist the surgeon in the preoperative planning to select the appropriate approach according to the patient's needs.

The primary objective is to investigate the active extension six months after implantation of the CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty, comparing the dorsal with the volar approach.

This is a randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
        • Schulthess Klinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty
  • Patient aged 18 years and over
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision surgery
  • CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty at the thumb IP joint
  • Major surgery at the same finger (e.g. DIP arthrodesis)
  • Ulnar/radial deviation of the PIP joint > 15°
  • Patients in which a reconstruction of the collateral ligaments has to be performed
  • General medical contraindication to surgery
  • German language barrier to complete the questionnaires
  • Any disease process that would preclude accurate evaluation (e.g. neuromuscular, psychiatric or metabolic disorder)
  • Pregnancy
  • Surgery not planned by Dr. Herren, Dr. Schindele or Dr. Bodmer
  • Legal incompetence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dorsal approach CapFlex arthroplasty
Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the dorsal approach.
Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the dorsal approach.
Active Comparator: Volar approach CapFlex arthroplasty
Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the volar approach.
Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the volar approach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Active extension of the PIP joint measured with a goniometer
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subjective function using the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (briefMHQ)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CapFlexRCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share data

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Dorsal approach CapFlex arthroplasty

Subscribe