Patient Controlled Intrathecal Analgesia With Bupivacaine for Chronic Low Back Pain

February 27, 2022 updated by: Salim M Hayek, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Randomized, Double Blind, Cross Over Study Comparing Effectiveness of Traditional Opioids Versus Opioids in Admixture With Bupivacaine Upon Self-administration of Boluses Via a Personal Therapy Manager (PTM) in Intrathecal Pumps

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the local anesthetic bupivacaine delivered intrathecally in small doses via PTM self-administered boluses significantly improves the breakthrough pain and functional status of patients with chronic intractable pain who are managed with an intrathecal drug delivery system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Methodology /Technical Approach:

Seventeen patients who are already using SynchroMed II pump containing an admixture of bupivacaine and an opioid and using PTM doses will receive Solution A during the first week of the study and will be crossed over to Solution B during the second week of the study. Solution A and Solution B would consist of either the patient's usual intrathecal opioid with bupivacaine at the same concentrations or the usual patient's intrathecal opioid at the same concentration but without bupivacaine. Only the Investigational Pharmacy at University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) would be aware of the contents of Solution A and Solution B. Patients and study personnel in the Pain Medicine Division would be blinded to the solution content. The sequence of pump refills will be as follows:

  • Week I: Patients will have the intrathecal pumps refilled with 10 milliliters of a Solution A or B, after removal of residual volume of baseline solution.
  • Week II: IT pump will be filled with 10 ml of Solution A or B (whichever solution subject did not receive Week 1), after removal of residual volume from Week I.

Both patients and the evaluating physician will be blinded. In order to accomplish this, only the central compounding (investigational) pharmacy at UHCMC would make two solutions labeled: A or B respectively. Study subjects will be randomized and randomization order will be held at the pharmacy that will supply the medication. Patients will be kept on each solution for one week. Data will be collected daily

Primary outcome measures will include 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both immediately before and within 30 minutes after a PTM bolus. Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Only 5 recording per day on days 3-7 and 10-14 will be available on the diary-thus patients would record pain scores only before and after the first 5 PTM boluses. Only the scores before and after the first 3 successful PTM boluses would be considered. Successful PTM activations would be determined by review of the patient PTM diary and the internal log from the intrathecal drug delivery system. Each recording on the PTM diary would be time matched to the successful PTM activation code in the internal log. This will obviate any potential mis-administered bolus whereby the patient does not activate the bolus device appropriately. Secondary outcome measures will include average NRS pain scores for the week, functional capacity as evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, Global Impression of Change and painDETECT. Other relevant data such as number of boluses used and paresthetic sensation post bolus (if felt)/patient guess of blinding arm would be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

31 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age more than 30 years implanted with an intrathecal drug delivery device.
  • Intrathecal pump patients on stable dose for the last 3 months.
  • Using on average more than 2 and less than 10 PTM doses per day
  • Intrathecal medication admixture consisting of bupivacaine and another opioid (fentanyl or hydromorphone or morphine)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Using 10 or more PTM bolus doses per day or 2 or less PTM bolus doses per day
  • Pending litigation or worker compensation claim
  • Any recent (less than 3 month) procedures in spine (surgeries) or catheter adjustments.
  • Recent pump dose adjustment within the past 3 months
  • Pumps with medications other than bupivacaine/opioid combination.
  • Pregnant or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bupivacaine + Opioid
Intrathecal solution has bupivacaine with an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine). Patients will administer PTM bolus of bupivacaine with opioid. The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be >2 and <10. The bupivacaine dosage would range between 0.4 and 1.5 mg per bolus. The opioid dose will vary depending on the concentration of the opioid in the solution.
Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain
Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain
Other Names:
  • Fentanyl
  • Morphine
  • Hydromorphone
Active Comparator: Opioid
Intrathecal solution has only an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine) and no bupivacaine. Patients will administer PTM bolus of opioid without bupivacaine. This opioid bolus dose would be the same as they would have received prior to enrolling in the study (with bupivacaine). The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be >2 and <10.
Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain
Other Names:
  • Fentanyl
  • Morphine
  • Hydromorphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus

Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus.

Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage.

Interpretation of percentage scores:

0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms

Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment

  1. = very much improved
  2. = much improved
  3. = minimally improved
  4. = no change
  5. = worse
  6. = much worse
  7. = very much worse
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Change From Baseline in painDETECT
Time Frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
painDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)
Time Frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week

Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
A 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction.
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe