Pulmonary Rehabilitation Before Lung Cancer Resection

This is a study funded by the National Institute of Health. The rationale for the need of this research is the lack of any well proven risk-reducing intervention that may decrease the morbidity of lung cancer resection in patients with COPD or that may improve their quality of life trajectory, a meaningful outcome in the overall disease progression. The proposed intervention is unique as it combines exercise and behavioral interventions that were pilot tested in a randomized single-blinded controlled design in the proposed population and proved feasible and potentially effective. The aim is to test the effect of the proposed rehabilitation on length of stay, pulmonary complications and quality of life trajectory.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospectively, 194 patients will be randomized to either ten sessions of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) vs. standard care at a number of healthcare centers throughout the United States. This study will be open for 36 months. Randomization will be stratified by three variables: very severe lung function (yes vs. no), prior neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for this operation (yes vs. no) and open thoracotomy vs. video assisted thoracoscopy. The primary and secondary objectives are provided below.

Primary Objective:

To prospectively determine the effect of 10 sessions of customized preoperative PR on the length of hospital stay in patients that undergo a lung cancer resection and have COPD compared to a matched control group. Hypothesis: Ten sessions of customized preoperative PR will significantly reduce the length of hospital stay.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. To prospectively determine the effect of 10 sessions of customized preoperative PR on the number of postoperative complications in patients that undergo a lung cancer resection and have COPD compared to a matched control group.

    • Hypothesis: Ten sessions of customized preoperative PR will significantly reduce the number of postoperative pulmonary complications.
  2. To prospectively determine the effect of a 10-session preoperative PR on the trajectory of quality of life at 3 and 6 months after the curative resection compared to a matched control group.

    • Hypothesis: Ten sessions of customized preoperative PR will significantly and meaningfully (more than the minimal clinically important difference) improve quality of life after surgery compared to a control group.

Patients will be followed at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
        • London Regional Cancer Program
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224-9980
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Baylor University Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54301
        • Saint Vincent Hospital Cancer Center Green Bay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. Patient is scheduled to undergo NSCLC resection: video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) or open thoracotomy for: limited resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy. Surgery must not be scheduled to take place < 3 weeks after registration.
  2. Patient has a doctor diagnosis of COPD.
  3. Patient is a current or ex-smoker with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years. (Calculated by multiplying the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day by the number of years the person has smoked. For example, 1 pack-year is equal to smoking 20 cigarettes (1 pack) per day for 1 year, or 40 cigarettes per day for half a year, and so on).
  4. Age ≥ 18 yrs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR)
Patients will receive 10 in-clinic sessions of preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) two weeks prior to surgery. Patients will receive a Participant Manual demonstrating and explaining the rehabilitation process. Patients will also receive a log for recording their efforts and notes for every day until the day of surgery. A video recording of the intervention from start to finish will be provided to all patients. The video recording should be played in all 10 sessions at the registering site. The PR sessions will include breathing awareness, upper and lower extremity exercise, instructions for inspiratory muscle training using the PFlex valve, practice at home and goal setting. Patients undergo surgery and will be followed until 6 months following surgery. Patients complete follow up questionnaires at 3 and 6 months after discharge.
pulmonary rehabilitation participant manual
pulmonary rehabilitation
receive a pamphlet with exercises plus the standard course of care
patients undergo surgery
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Patients will receive a pedometer to monitor their daily steps and a pamphlet with exercises plus the standard course of care for patients undergoing lung resection surgery. The patients will not be asked to return the pedometer. The local institutional coordinator will go over the use of the pedometer and the exercise materials with the patient. The patients will be asked to keep a log of their pre-operative steps and mail the log to the registering site. Patients undergo surgery and will be followed until 6 months following surgery. Patients complete follow up questionnaires at 3 and 6 months after discharge.
pulmonary rehabilitation participant manual
receive a pamphlet with exercises plus the standard course of care
patients undergo surgery
receive a pedometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay Assessed With Complete Admission Hospital Records
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

The coordinator at each site will be responsible for sending complete de-identified hospital records from each patient to Dr. Benzo's staff, where a nurse blinded to the study arm will abstract the main outcome (length of stay and postoperative complications).

The primary endpoint will be assessed at Dr. Benzo's office (Mayo Clinic) with the complete admission hospital records in order to extract the length of stay. The records will be mailed from the sites to Johanna Hoult in a pre-stamped envelope.

Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Pulmonary Complications Assessed by Chart Review
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The following events will be considered postoperative pulmonary complications: pneumonia (new infiltrate + either fever (>38.5 C) and white cell count >11,000 or fever and purulent secretions), severe atelectasis (requiring bronchoscopy), prolonged chest tubes (>6 days), and respiratory failure (intubation or prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 hours). These outcomes will be obtained by chart review by a nurse trained in the abstraction of the desired outcomes from the medical records and blinded to treatment assignment.
Up to 6 months
Quality of Life (QOL) Assessed by Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 months
Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) (four domains: dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function and mastery). This instrument will be the primary tool to assess QoL given that it was specifically designed for COPD. Specifically, the CRQ represents one of the most well known, widely-applied, and psychometrically-sound patient reported outcomes for use in clinical trials involving patients with COPD. Each domain includes 4 to 7 items, with each item graded on 7-point Likert scale; item scores within a domain are summated to provide a total score for each domain. The endpoint value is the 6 month values minus the baseline values. Therefore the endpoint score may range from minus-7 to 7. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. A negative change from baseline to study completion indicates a worsening score.
At baseline and at 6 months
Quality of Life (QOL) Assessed by Linear Analog Self-Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
LASA (single-item numerical analogue quality of life Questionnaire) individual QOL domain scores have been validated previously for lung cancer patient populations and for assessment of patient-reported outcomes in similar trials. Survey is based on 6 questions that are scored on a 0-10 scale with 0 being "as bad as it can be" and 10 being "As good as it can be." A negative change in score from baseline indicates a worsening score.
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Benzo, MD, MSc, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A221502
  • NCI-2016-01105 (Registry Identifier: NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Clinical Trials on education

3
Subscribe