Underwater Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions

December 18, 2018 updated by: VA Northern California Health Care System

Underwater Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of underwater resection (polypectomy) versus conventional polypectomy techniques for small and large colorectal lesions identified during colonoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conventional endoscopic resection of small and large (≥1cm) colorectal lesions is well established and performed with the colon fully distended with gas. Conventional polypectomy is effective, but the rate of incomplete resection is approximately 10%. Incomplete eradication of precancerous lesions contributes to interval colorectal cancer; therefore, alternative techniques for resection that safely and effectively increase the rate of complete resection are important. Underwater resection (UR) of benign colorectal lesions is a novel technique that utilizes the advantages of water aided endoscopic methods and may decrease the incomplete resection rate of small and large non-pedunculated lesions.

The investigators propose the hypothesis that small (6-9mm) and large (≥1cm) non-pedunculated neoplastic colorectal lesions resected by UR (partially distended, water filled lumen without submucosal fluid injection), will significantly decrease the incomplete resection rate (IRR) compared to conventional polypectomy performed in a gas distended lumen.

Small (6-9mm) and large (≥1cm) non-pedunculated benign neoplastic colorectal lesions identified during screening, surveillance, diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy will be randomized to conventional polypectomy (in a gas distended lumen with or without submucosal fluid injection) versus UR (partially distended, water filled lumen without submucosal injection) at the patient level. Small (6-9mm) lesions will be removed with a 9mm firm, thin wire cold snare and large (≥1cm) lesions will be removed by snare electrocautery. Efforts to remove lesions en bloc with a small rim of normal mucosa will be made, although some larger lesions (≥2cm) may require piecemeal resection. Submucosal fluid injection with a solution may be used with conventional techniques for large and/or flat lesions. Post-polypectomy incomplete resection rates will be assessed from 4 quadrant biopsies obtained around the resection site immediately post-resection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Mather, California, United States, 95655
        • Sacramento VA Medical Center (VANCHCS)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (≥18 years old) male and female patients.
  • Scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy.
  • Patient able to provide informed consent.
  • Benign, small (6-9mm) and large (≥1cm) non-pedunculated colorectal lesions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diminutive (≤5mm) and pedunculated polyps.
  • Lesions suspected of harboring deep submucosal invasion.
  • Patients who decline to participate or are unable to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Underwater resection
All eligible lesion identified in a patient will be resected by the underwater technique. Excluded lesions will be resected by standard polypectomy.
Underwater resection of eligible lesions will be performed with air exclusion (air will be suctioned and completely removed) without submucosal injection in a partially collapsed colon lumen filled with water. Water will be infused with the foot pedal to facilitate visualization during UR and there will be no limit to the amount of water infused. Hot and cold resection techniques will be utilized.
Standard polypectomy will be performed for diminutive (<6mm), pedunculated and semi-pedunculated lesions that do not fall under the inclusion criteria for the study. These lesions will be removed in a gas distended colon with a 9mm firm, thin wire cold snare or snare electrocautery for large (≥1cm) lesions.
Active Comparator: Conventional resection
All eligible lesion identified in a patient will be resected by the conventional (gas distended colon) resection techniques. Excluded lesions will be resected by standard polypectomy.
Standard polypectomy will be performed for diminutive (<6mm), pedunculated and semi-pedunculated lesions that do not fall under the inclusion criteria for the study. These lesions will be removed in a gas distended colon with a 9mm firm, thin wire cold snare or snare electrocautery for large (≥1cm) lesions.
Conventional polypectomy of eligible lesions will be performed in a gas distended colon. Hot and cold resection techniques will be utilized. Submucosal fluid injection with a solution containing hydroxyethyl starch, dilute epinephrine and a contrast agent may be used with conventional techniques for large (≥1cm) and/or flat lesions. There will be no limit to the amount of submucosal injection used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incomplete resection rate (histologic)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew W Yen, MD, VA Northern California Health Care System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Underwater resection

3
Subscribe