Psychiatry Study: Parkinson Disease

September 2, 2016 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Improvement of Social Adaptation After Pre-operative Cognitive Remediation in Parkinson's Patients Profiting From a Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation

Main objective:

To assess the impact of a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation on postoperative social adaptation in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease profiting from bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation.

Secondary objectives:

To assess in the same patients the impact of structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation on quality of life, mood, anxiety, apathy and psychologic, social and professional functioning depending on psychiatric symptomatology after intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, longitudinal, controlled, multicentric, randomised, open study.

Subjects: 3 groups of 40 patients (n=120): one group of patients profiting from a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation (SICRPPD group: Specific Individual Cognitive Remediation Program in Parkinson's Disease), one group of patients profiting from a preoperative non structured accompaniment (ICM group: Intensive Care Management), one control group (CG group: Control Group).

Required sample size: The sample size of 40 patients/group will allow to demonstrate with a significance threshold of 5% and a power of 80% a difference of evolution of the global SAS SR score of 0.75 SD between 2 of the 3 groups. For an intended SD of 0.2 units, the threshold corresponds to a difference of 0.15 units, minimal significant change.

Intervention: The structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation is divided in 3 parts: one interview with the patient to do a building of the subjective theories (difficulties due to the disease, hope relative to the intervention), a study meeting of the cognitive remediation possibilities and a cognitive remediation meeting with the patient. The spouse will be included in the program.

Evaluation tools: Patients will be met before and after the intervention for clinical evaluations and scales making: For the psychiatric evaluation: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory (M.I.N.I.), Starkstein Apathy Scale, Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADRS), global functioning evaluation scale (EGF) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA)/ For the social adaptation evaluation: Social Adjustment scale Self Report (SAS SR)/ For quality of life evaluation: 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)/ For the daily life activities, 'motor' symptomatology and treatment complications evaluation: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, parties II, III, et IV).

Main criteria: change in the global score of the SAS SR scale.

Secondary Criteria: change in scores of the PDQ-39 (quality of life), HAMA (anxiety), Starkstein (apathy), MADRS (mood), EGF (psychologic, social, professional functioning, and depending on the psychiatric symptomatology) questionnaires.

Statistics: parametric and non parametric tests will be done for p < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU Clermont Ferrand
      • Nancy, France, 54035
        • Chu de Nancy
      • Strasbourg, France, 67426
        • CHRU Strasbourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women suffering from idiopathic Parkinson's disease for which the indication of treatment by deep cerebral stimulation is retained
  • Obtained informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of social security
  • Patient unable to be compliant
  • Major patient under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: SICRPPD group
(Specific Individual Cognitive Remediation Program in Parkinson's Disease). Group of patients profiting from a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation

Questionnaire to fill-in.

The structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation is divided in 3 parts: one interview with the patient to do a building of the subjective theories (difficulties due to the disease, hope relative to the intervention), a study meeting of the cognitive remediation possibilities and a cognitive remediation meeting with the patient. The spouse will be included in the program.

Other: ICM group: Intensive Care Management
Group of patients profiting from a preoperative non structured support
In this group, the structured program of the SICRPPD group will be replaced by 3 unstructured psychiatric interviews during which patients will be assessed for their perception of the disease and the upcoming surgery. This group will allow to control for the intrinsic effect of the preoperative management independently of the remediation itself.
Other: CG group: Control Group
No supplementary support

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global score of the SAS SR (social adjustment scale self report) scale
Time Frame: 3 months (after surgery)
3 months (after surgery)
Global score of the SAS SR (social adjustment scale self report) scale
Time Frame: 6 months (after surgery)
6 months (after surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluated with PDQ-39 (39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire)
3 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluated with WHOQOL-bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life)
3 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluated with PDQ-39 (39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire)
6 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluated with WHOQOL-bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life)
6 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluated with HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale)
3 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluated with HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale)
6 months
Apathy
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluated with Starkstein scale
3 months
Apathy
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluated with Starkstein scale
6 months
Mood
Time Frame: 3 months
evaluated with Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale
3 months
Mood
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluated with Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale
6 months
Global Assessment of Functioning
Time Frame: 3 months
to rate the social, occupational, and psychological functioning according to psychiatric symptomatology
3 months
Global Assessment of Functioning
Time Frame: 6 months
to rate the social, occupational, and psychological functioning according to psychiatric symptomatology
6 months
Disease perception
Time Frame: 3 months
Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised
3 months
Disease perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised
6 months
Perception of deep brain stimulation
Time Frame: 3 months
with Perception of deep brain stimulation scale
3 months
Perception of deep brain stimulation
Time Frame: 6 months
with Perception of deep brain stimulation scale
6 months
Coping with disease
Time Frame: 3 months
with CHIP scale
3 months
Coping with disease
Time Frame: 3 months
with Brief COPE scale
3 months
Coping with disease
Time Frame: 6 months
with CHIP scale
6 months
Coping with disease
Time Frame: 6 months
with Brief COPE scale
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymund Schwan, Prof., Nancy's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Gérard Barroche, Prof., CHU of Nancy - Central Hospital - Bd Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny - 54000 Nancy
  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Christine Tranchant, Prof., CHU of Strasbourg - 67000 Strasbourg
  • Principal Investigator: Franck Durif, Prof, CHU Clermont-Ferrand - 63000 Clermont Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Social adaptation

3
Subscribe