Effects of Empagliflozin on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Compared to Usual Care in Type 2 Diabetics (EmDia)

April 16, 2021 updated by: Philipp Wild, MD, MSc, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

A Phase IV, Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study on the Effects of Empagliflozin on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Compared to Usual Care in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

The purpose of the EmDia trial is to compare the effects of empagliflozin with placebo in addition to standard diabetic treatment or dietetic treatment on cardiac diastolic function in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diabetes is a serious and increasing global health burden. It has been shown, that diabetes is associated with a two-fold higher risk for coronary heart disease, stroke and for the aggregate of other vascular death independently of other conventional risk factors. It is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease.

Diabetes mellitus substantially increases the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications, such as vascular dysfunction with developing coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, nerve disorders (neuropathy), eye complications (e.g. cataracts, glaucoma diabetic retinopathy), kidney disease (nephropathy), foot ulcers, restriction of mental function, and psychosomatic diseases (e.g. stress, anxiety and depression).

The most common of the cardiovascular complications in diabetics are ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Of particular interest here is the diastolic dysfunction, as an early sign of diabetic heart muscle disease followed by systolic damage.

Although diabetes has a decisive role in the development of cardiovascular disease, traditional glucose lowering agents have failed to convincingly show that intensive glucose control significantly reduces CVD events.

A new approach for treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes was found with the selective inhibition of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2). Studies have shown that empagliflozin, a potent SGLT2 inhibitor, not only effectively reduces the rates of hyperglycemia but also blood pressure and weight. (16, 18) In addition, beneficial effects on arterial stiffness and vascular resistance, visceral adiposity, albuminuria and plasma urate have been reported.

The results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study suggest that empagliflozin added to the standard therapy has a positive influence on cardiovascular outcomes and heart failure hospitalization in individuals with diabetic mellitus.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of empagliflozin, in comparison with placebo, on cardiac and vascular function as well as on cardiac biomarker in individuals with type 2 diabetes with standard therapy, increased E/E' ratio and poor glycemic control.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Zentrum für Kardiologie, Präventive Kardiologie und Medizinische Prävention

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 84 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting all of the following criteria at visit 0 (screening) will be considered for admission to the trial:

  • Diagnosis of type 2-diabetes mellitus with stable glucose-lowering background therapy and/or dietetic treatment for at least 12 weeks
  • In subjects without glucose-lowering background therapy: the application of Metformin was considered to be unsuitable due to drug intolerance
  • HbA1c level of ≥6.5% and ≤10.0% at visit 0 (screening) for subjects on antidiabetic background therapy or HbA1c level of ≥6.5% and ≤9.0% for drug-naïve subjects with dietetic treatment
  • Diastolic cardiac dysfunction E/E' ratio ≥8 (2D-echocardiography)
  • Age 18 - 84 years
  • BMI ≤ 45 kg/m² (Body Mass Index)
  • For women: post-menopausal for more than 12 months without an alternative medical cause can participate in the trial. Women with childbearing potential can only participate, if they are surgically sterile or a negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) is available at visit 1 and they are willing to practice highly effective birth control method during trial. Reliable highly effective contraception comprises

    • combined (estrogen and progesteron containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal)
    • progesteron-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovaluation (oral, injectable, implantable)
    • intrauterine device (IUD)
    • intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
    • bilateral tubal occlusion
    • vasectomised partner (provided that partner is the sole sexual partner and that the vasectomised partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success)
    • sexual abstinence (defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatment. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject.
  • Ability of subject to understand nature, importance and individual consequences of clinical trial
  • Signed and dated informed consent of the subject must be available before start of any specific trial procedures which is consistent with ICH-GCP guidelines and local legislation

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects presenting with any of the following criteria at visit 0 (screening) will not be included in the trial:

  • Pretreatment with empagliflozin or other SGLT2 inhibitor within the last 3 months
  • Pretreatment with known inducers of UGT enzymes
  • Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with a glucose level > 240 mg/dl (>13.3 mmol/L) after an overnight fast
  • Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m² of body-surface-area
  • End-stage renal failure or dialysis
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction, defined by serum levels of either SGPT, SGOT, or alkaline phosphatase above 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Acute urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Known acute genital infection (GI)
  • Symptomatic hypotension
  • Hematocrit above the upper limit of the reference range
  • Hypoglycemic tendencies
  • Severe PAD (Fontaine classification Stage IIb - IV)
  • Medical history of cancer and/or treatment for cancer within the last 5 years, subjects basalioma can be included in the study
  • Medical history of pancreatitis or surgery on pancreas
  • Known ketoacidosis (in the past)
  • Acute febrile disease
  • NYHA classification III - IV
  • Pregnant and/or nursing women at visit 1 (baseline)
  • Acute coronary syndrome, stroke or TIA within the last 2 months
  • Planned cardiac surgery or angioplasty within 3 months
  • Gastrointestinal surgeries that induce chronic malabsorption
  • Blood dyscrasia or any disorders causing hemolysis or unstable Red Blood Cells (e.g. malaria, babesiosis, hemolytic anemia)
  • History of hypersensitivity to the investigational medicinal product or to any drug with similar chemical structure or to any excipient present in the pharmaceutical form of the investigational medicinal product
  • Alcohol or drug abuse within the last 3 months that would interfere with trial participation
  • Medical or psychological conditions that would jeopardize an adequate and orderly completion of the trial (at visit 0 (screening) or at visit 1 (baseline))
  • Medical condition that does not allow enrollment in the trial at visit 1 (baseline)
  • Current treatment with systemic steroids or change in dosage of thyroid hormones within the last 6 weeks or any other uncontrolled endocrine disorder except type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Hereditary glucose intolerance, galactose intolerance, Lapp-lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose-malabsorption
  • Intake of an investigational drug in another trial within 30 days prior to intake of study medication in this trial or participating in another trial (involving an investigational drug and/or follow-up)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Empagliflozin
10 mg Empagliflozin daily per os for 12 weeks
10 mg per os daily for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Jardiance
Experimental: Placebo
amount of Placebo corresponding to empagliflozin 10 mg daily per os for 12 weeks
amount of Placebo corresponding to empagliflozin 10 mg per os daily for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in E/E' ratio between 12 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in E/E' ratio (noninvasive surrogate marker for left ventricular diastolic function (LVEDP) measured by 2D-echocardiography) between 12 weeks after baseline and at baseline
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in E/E' ratio (change from baseline (V1) to 1 week follow-up)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in E/E' ratio (change from baseline (V1) to 1 week follow-up (2D-echocardiography)
1 week
difference in Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in Left end-diastolic volume (LEDV)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Left end-diastolic volume (LEDV) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Left end-diastolic volume (LEDV)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Left end-diastolic volume (LEDV) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV, vascular explorer - calculated) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV, vascular explorer - calculated) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in Augmentation index (AIx)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Augmentation index (AIx, vascular explorer) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Augmentation index (AIx)
Time Frame: 12 week
difference in Augmentation index (AIx, vascular explorer) from baseline to week 12
12 week
difference in Arterial stiffness index (SI)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Arterial stiffness index (SI, photo plethysmography) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Arterial stiffness index (SI)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Arterial stiffness index (SI, photo plethysmography) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in Reflection index
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Reflection index (photo plethysmography) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Reflection index
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Reflection index (photo plethysmography) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in High sensitive troponin I (hs TnI)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in High sensitive troponin I (hs TnI) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in High sensitive troponin I (hs TnI)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in High sensitive troponin I (hs TnI) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in High sensitive C-reactive protein (hs CRP)
Time Frame: 1 week
difference in High sensitive C-reactive protein (hs CRP) from baseline to week 1
1 week
difference in High sensitive C-reactive protein (hs CRP)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in High sensitive C-reactive protein (hs CRP) from baseline to week 12
12 weeks
difference in E/E' ratio (change from baseline (V1) to 12 weeks follow-up) in the subgroup of patients with eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m²
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in E/E' ratio (noninvasive surrogate marker for left ventricular diastolic function (LVEDP) measured by 2D-echocardiography) between 12 weeks after baseline and at baseline in the subgroup of patients with eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m²
12 weeks
difference in E/E' ratio (change from baseline (V1) to 12 weeks follow-up) in the subgroup of patients with HbA1c 6.5%-6.9%
Time Frame: 12 weeks
difference in E/E' ratio (noninvasive surrogate marker for left ventricular diastolic function (LVEDP) measured by 2D-echocardiography) between 12 weeks after baseline and at baseline in the subgroup of patients with with HbA1c 6.5%-6.9%
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in biomarkers of cardiac diseases
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in biomarkers of cardiac diseases
1 week
difference in biomarkers of cardiac diseases
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in biomarkers of cardiac diseases
12 weeks
difference in biomarkers of vascular diseases
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in biomarkers of vascular diseases
1 week
difference in biomarkers of vascular diseases
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in biomarkers of vascular diseases
12 weeks
difference in biomarkers of metabolic/diabetic status
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in biomarkers of metabolic/diabetic status
1 week
difference in biomarkers of metabolic/diabetic status
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in biomarkers of metabolic/diabetic status
12 weeks
changes in vascular/endothelial function
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in vascular/endothelial function
1 week
changes in vascular/endothelial function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in vascular/endothelial function
12 weeks
changes in carotid atherosclerosis
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in carotid atherosclerosis
1 week
changes in carotid atherosclerosis
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in carotid atherosclerosis
12 weeks
changes in pulmonary function
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in pulmonary function
1 week
changes in pulmonary function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in pulmonary function
12 weeks
changes in ophthalmological diseases
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in ophthalmological diseases
1 week
changes in ophthalmological diseases
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in ophthalmological diseases
12 weeks
changes in psychosomatic diseases
Time Frame: 1 week
changes between baseline and follow-up after 1 week in psychosomatic diseases
1 week
changes in psychosomatic diseases
Time Frame: 12 weeks
changes between baseline and follow-up after 12 weeks in psychosomatic diseases
12 weeks
association analysis for selected SNPs
Time Frame: baseline
association analysis for selected SNPs (measured at baseline)
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philipp Wild, MD, MSc, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Empagliflozin

Subscribe