Gabapentin as an Adjunct to Paracervical Block for Perioperative Pain Management (Gaba)

July 17, 2019 updated by: Lisa Haddad, Emory University

Gabapentin as an Adjunct to Paracervical Block for Perioperative Pain Management for Surgical Abortion: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin 600 mg compared to placebo given 1-2 hours preoperatively in conjunction with perioperative paracervical block for surgical abortion. The researchers hypothesize that adding gabapentin to local anesthesia will reduce perioperative and postoperative pain associated with surgical abortion. Additionally, the researchers hypothesize that gabapentin will reduce nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and consumption of pain medication.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Project Summary

Justification for the project

One half of all pregnancies among American women are unintended, with nearly 4 in 10 ending in pregnancy termination by abortion. Elective abortions are among the most common outpatient surgical procedure, with an estimated 46 million performed worldwide annually. The management of pain is critical to patient care throughout the abortion experience since the vast majority of women will experience pain with the procedure. Patients are most affected by pain during paracervical block, cervical dilation, suction aspiration, and post operatively with uterine cramping. Innovation in pain control and reduction of anxiety, nausea and vomiting using a low cost, well-tolerated intervention could impact thousands of women each year.

Proposed research

This is a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin 600 mg compared to placebo given 1-2 hours preoperatively in conjunction with perioperative paracervical block for surgical abortion. The researchers hypothesize that adding gabapentin to local anesthesia will reduce perioperative and postoperative pain associated with surgical abortion. Additionally, the researchers hypothesize that gabapentin will reduce nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and consumption of pain medication.

New features

Gabapentin as an adjunct o pain management has proven beneficial in gynecological surgery. Its use in similar surgical settings as an adjunct to pain management regiments has proven to be beneficial. It is generally well tolerated, inexpensive, has minimal side effects, and few contraindications.

Problems anticipated

The high volume at the study clinic will benefit recruitment efforts, however, as the coordination of this study may potentially disrupt clinic flow there will be limits on daily recruitment. Postoperative follow-up may be challenging, thus to reduce the impact of loss to follow-up, most of the outcomes are measured on the same day as the procedure. Further, multiple contact approaches will be employed and a second incentive offered after completion of the postoperative assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Atlanta Women's Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women >=18 years-old
  • Presenting for a surgical abortion
  • Fluency in English and able to provide informed consent
  • Has a driver to take them home following the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy, sensitivity or contraindication to gabapentin
  • Severe renal disease
  • Currently using gabapentin or pregabalin
  • Contraindication to outpatient abortion under local anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gabapentin group
This group will receive local anesthesia per clinic protocol plus Gabapentin 600mg 1-2 hours preoperatively.
Participants in this group will receive 600 mg of gabapentin given 1-2 hours pre-operatively in conjunction with perioperative paracervical block for surgical abortion. Gabapentin is an FDA approved medication that is used to prevent seizures and to treat various forms of chronic and acute pain.
Other Names:
  • Neurontin
  • Gaba
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
This group will receive local anesthesia per clinic protocol plus placebo 1-2 hours preoperatively.
Participants in this group will receive 600 mg of gelatin capsules that are identical in appearance to gabapentin capsules. The placebo will be given 1-2 hours pre-operatively in conjunction with perioperative paracervical block for surgical abortion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain at Time of Uterine Evacuation
Time Frame: During the procedure on Study Day 1
The primary outcome measure is a pain score using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) measured intraoperatively at time of evacuation. "No pain" is scored as 0 and "worst pain imaginable" is scored as 100.
During the procedure on Study Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative Pain Level
Time Frame: Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Pain level at a variety of time points will be measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) to log the change in pain levels between the study arms. "No pain" is scored as 0 and "worst pain imaginable" is scored as 100. Pain will be assessed immediately prior to the procedure, at completion of the procedure (removal of the speculum), 10 minutes following the procedure, and 30 minutes following the procedure (at discharge).
Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Number of Participants Using Pain Medication
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
The number of participants reporting filling and using the prescription for ibuprofen postoperatively. During the follow-up phone call on the day after the procedure, participants were asked whether or not they filled the pain medication prescription and if they took any of the medication.
Postoperative Day 1
Perioperative Nausea
Time Frame: Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Nausea level was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) to log the change in nausea levels between the study arms. No nausea is reported as 0 while "worst nausea I have ever felt" is reported at 100. Nausea was reported immediately prior to the procedure, 10 minutes following the procedure, and 30 minutes following the procedure.
Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Perioperative Vomiting
Time Frame: Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Participants reported if they vomited during the perioperative period to assess changes in vomiting incidences between the study arms. Vomiting is reported for the time periods of immediately prior to the procedure, 10 minutes following the procedure, and 30 minutes following the procedure.
Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Anxiety Levels
Time Frame: Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Participants reported how much anxiety they were currently experiencing on a 100-point scale where "No Anxiety" is scored as 0 and "Extremely Anxious" is scored as 100. Anxiety is reported for the time periods of immediately prior to the procedure, 10 minutes after the procedure, and 30 minutes after the procedure.
Pre-procedure through post-procedure on Study Day 1
Side Effects
Time Frame: 10 and 30 minutes post procedure on Study Day 1
Participants were asked if they experienced dizziness, lack of muscle control, sleepiness or drowsiness, weakness or lack of energy, headache, or visual changes.
10 and 30 minutes post procedure on Study Day 1
Moderate Pain at Postoperation Follow-up Assessment
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
During the Postoperative Day 1 phone call, participants self reported how much they experienced moderate pain in the last 24 hours where 10 = none of the time and 0 = all of the time. "Moderate pain" was defined according to the perception of each participant.
Postoperative Day 1
Severe Pain at Postoperation Follow-up Assessment
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
During the Postoperative Day 1 phone call, participants self reported how much they experienced severe pain in the last 24 hours where 10 = none of the time and 0 = all of the time. "Severe pain" was defined according to the perception of each participant.
Postoperative Day 1
Nausea or Vomiting at Postoperation Follow-up Assessment
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
During the Postoperative Day 1 phone call, participants self reported how much they experienced nausea or vomiting in the last 24 hours where 10 = none of the time and 0 = all of the time. Nausea and vomiting were self-reported together as a single outcome.
Postoperative Day 1
Vomiting Since Leaving Clinic
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
During the Postoperative Day 1 phone call, participants self reported whether or not they had vomited since leaving the clinic.
Postoperative Day 1
Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
Overall satisfaction with the procedure was assessed on a 10-point scale on the day after the procedure, where 1 = very dissatisfied and 10 = very satisfied.
Postoperative Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Haddad, MD, MS, MPH, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Gabapentin

Subscribe