Effectiveness of a Unified Transdiagnostic Treatment in Routine Care

August 12, 2019 updated by: Boston University

Effectiveness of a Unified Transdiagnostic Treatment in Routine Clinical Care

The purpose of this study is to examine effectiveness and implementation for the Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in trauma exposed veterans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anxiety and mood diagnoses are chronic and devastating with respect to costs to the individual and the healthcare system, and are more prevalent than any other class of disorders. When these disorders present concurrently, the significant public health implications and societal costs are intensified. Despite high rates of comorbidity and underlying mechanistic similarities between treatment protocols, single disorder evidence- based psychotherapy protocols for these disorders have traditionally been recommended to treat emotional disorders sequentially. Moreover, when clinicians are presented with complex case presentations, they are often unprepared to treat them and move away from evidence-based approaches, potentially increasing the burden on the mental health system. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an innovative transdiagnostic protocol with promising evidence for successful treatment of emotional disorders, both for standalone and comorbid presentations, including the classification of not otherwise specified (NOS) disorders. To date, there have only been efficacy trials of the UP, which limit generalizability and do not address the larger public health impact and effectiveness in routine clinical care settings with both psychiatric and medical comorbidity. To address this critical limitation, the applicant proposes a pilot feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability study of the UP in patients with diverse psychiatric and medical comorbidity to manualized supportive therapy within a hospital. The deployment focused model (DFM) will inform design and statistical analyses. An additional aim includes determining the feasibility, acceptability, perceived fit and satisfaction of the UP in clinic settings through surveying and interviewing stakeholders in the system that are implementing the UP through the study. Consultation with stakeholders can minimize the time required to collect and assess fit within the larger system and, therefore, minimizes the time lag between science and practice in routine care settings. This study addresses an important public health concern by examining the effectiveness of the UP in a new population as a strategy for treatment of common and debilitating mental disorders in routine care settings. Furthermore, the proposed research aims will complement a comprehensive training plan to prepare the applicant to become an independent investigator with expertise in implementation science and effectiveness research. Results from the study will provide important information about whether or not this efficacious treatment can be effective, efficient, and ready for implementation in routine care settings in which psychiatric and medical comorbidity are common. This study will also serve as a model of deploying efficacious treatments into generalist clinics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
        • VA Boston Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Veteran Participants:

  • VA Boston Health Care Patient:

Definition: Currently enrolled as a patient at VA Boston Healthcare System

  • Diagnosis of an emotional disorder Definition: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) diagnosis of any emotional disorder (anxiety disorder, traumatic stress disorders, or unipolar depression)
  • Cognitive Functioning:

Definition: free of cognitive impairment demonstrated by ability to understand and provide consent

  • Psychotherapy:

Definition: not currently in psychotherapy for an emotional disorder treated in the study

Stakeholder Inclusion Criteria

  • Provider Status:

Definition: Providing or overseeing mental health treatment in VA Boston Healthcare System and VA Puget Sound Healthcare System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran Participant Exclusionary Criteria
  • Current diagnosis of substance dependence (but not abuse)
  • Primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder
  • Current diagnosis of psychosis
  • High suicidal risk (plan with intent)
  • Recent change in psychiatric medications (< 3 months prior to entering the study).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Unified Protocol
Unified Protocol-psychotherapy
This is a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy
Experimental: Routine Care
Routine Care psychotherapy comparison
This arm will reflect typical care received in routine mental health care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barriers and facilitators that impact implementation of the intervention measured by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
Time Frame: One time assessment, occurring on 1 day, approximately 4 months after treatment initiation
These interviews will occur at one time point and will be analyzed with Qualitative Comparative Analyses guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative analyses are often descriptive in nature and a summary of common themes are reported to speak to factors impacting implementation of the intervention in this population. NVivo software will be used to aggregate the qualitative interviews from all participants and highlight the common themes across CFIR interviews
One time assessment, occurring on 1 day, approximately 4 months after treatment initiation
Change in clinician administered Anxiety Disorders Interview Scheduled will be used to generate clinical diagnoses for mental health disorders
Time Frame: 7 months
Change will be examined from baseline through the end of treatment. For each participant it will be reported if there was a change in each participants clinician administered diagnostic assessment and the resulting clinician severity rating for each mental health diagnosis. This assessment will be used in conjunction with the CAPS-5 (outcome 3) to inform the presence or absence of clinical diagnoses at baseline and follow-up. Each has it's own metric, but can be used to show the presence or absence of a clinical level of the diagnosis
7 months
Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) will be used to asses the presence or absence of a clinical diagnosis of PTSD
Time Frame: 7 months
Change will be examined from baseline through the end of treatment. For each participant it will be reported if there was a change in each participants clinician administered diagnostic assessment and the resulting severity rating for a PTSD diagnosis. This assessment will be used in conjunction with the ADIS-5 (outcome 2) to inform the presence or absence of clinical diagnoses at baseline and follow-up. Each has it's own metric, but can be used to show the presence or absence of a clinical level of the diagnosis. They cannot be combine into one variable unless a dichotomous score is calculated to indicate a clinical diagnosis more broadly is present versus absent.
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cassidy Gutner, PhD, Boston University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-33257
  • K23MH103396 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Unified protocol

3
Subscribe