Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Formulations of Ultra-low Dose Estriol Vaginal Gel (0.005%, 0.002%, 0.0008% Estriol Vaginal Gel) for the Treatment of Vaginal Dryness in Postmenopausal Women With Vulvovaginal Atrophy

August 22, 2019 updated by: ITF Research Pharma, S.L.U.

A Phase 2, Dose-ranging, 12-week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Formulations of Ultra-low Dose Estriol Vaginal Gel (0.005% Estriol Vaginal Gel, 0.002% Estriol Vaginal Gel, 0.0008% Estriol Vaginal Gel) for the Treatment of Vaginal Dryness in Postmenopausal Women With Vulvovaginal Atrophy

A Phase 2, Dose-ranging, 12-week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Parallel-group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Formulations of Ultra-low Dose Estriol Vaginal Gel (0.005% Estriol Vaginal Gel, 0.002% Estriol Vaginal Gel, 0.0008% Estriol Vaginal Gel) for the Treatment of Vaginal Dryness in Postmenopausal Women with Vulvovaginal Atrophy.

Vulvovaginal atrophy is a natural consequence of the progressive estrogen deficiency that occurs in menopause. Epidemiological data have indicated that about 50% of otherwise healthy women over 60 years of age experience symptoms related to urogenital atrophy such as vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, burning, itching, as well as urinary complaints or infections of the lower urinary tract. As these alterations frequently affect the quality of life of postmenopausal women, it is important for doctors to detect their presence and offer treatment options. Estrogen therapy is the most effective treatment of moderate to severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy. One advantage of local treatment with estrogen is avoidance of first-pass liver metabolism, making it possible to use lower doses of estrogen compared with oral therapy; the local route also minimize systemic adverse effects. The search for therapeutic alternatives which may present improvements in relation to the current products has been encouraged.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

283

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brno, Czechia, 602 00
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U
      • Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, 370 01
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 779 00
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Olomouc, Czechia
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Pisek, Czechia, 397 01
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Prague, Czechia
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Vsetin, Czechia
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6725
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U
      • Szekesfehervar, Hungary, 8000
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U
      • Szentes, Hungary, 6725
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Tatabanya, Hungary, 2800
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Catania, Italy, 95123
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Catanzaro, Italy, 88100
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Siena, Italy, 53100
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Barcelona, Spain, 80022
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Huddinge, Sweden, 141 86
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Kungsbacka, Sweden, 434 30
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact ITF Research Pharma S.L.U.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Capable of understanding the written informed consent, provides signed and witnessed written informed consent, and agrees to comply with the protocol procedures and assessments
  2. Age >40 and <80 years
  3. Postmenopausal (≥12 months since last spontaneous menstrual period, or having 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels >40 IU/L, or ≥6 weeks since bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy)
  4. BMI ≤36 kg/m2
  5. Vaginal Maturation Index ≤ 5% superficial cells on a vaginal smear
  6. Vaginal pH >5
  7. Moderate to severe vaginal dryness currently reported as the most bothersome symptom of vaginal atrophy.
  8. Documented negative mammogram within 9 months prior to randomization, with normal breast examination at screening.
  9. Negative Papanicolau test at screening (in women with cervix).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with contraindications for hormone therapy with estrogens such as those diagnosed or history of: malignant and premalignant lesions of the breast and/or endometrium, malignancy of the colon, malignant melanoma, hepatic tumor, venous thromboembolic conditions (including deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), arterial thromboembolic conditions (including angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident), coagulopathies, vaginal bleeding of unknown etiology, acute liver disease or a history of liver disease as long as liver function tests have failed to return to normal, or porphyria.
  2. Subjects who have abnormal laboratory values at screening that the investigator considers clinically relevant for the purposes of the study.
  3. Subjects with any medical-surgical pathology which is not controlled at the time of inclusion in the study
  4. Subjects with any acute or chronic condition whose management or progression may interfere with the subject´s participation in the study.
  5. Subject with uncontrolled hypertension (>140 mmHg systolic blood pressure and/or ≥90 mmHg diastolic blood pressure).
  6. Subjects with Grade II or higher utero-vaginal prolapse.
  7. Subjects with uterine polyps.
  8. Subjects with symptomatic and/or large uterine fibroids (>3 cm) and/or palpable fibroids at gynecological examination.
  9. Subjects who have had urogenital surgery within 3 months of baseline visit.
  10. Subjects with signs and symptoms suggestive of infection of the genital or urinary tract requiring treatment at the start of the study.
  11. In women who have a uterus, evidence of hyperplasia, cancer or other endometrial pathology in endometrial biopsy.
  12. Subjects who have received the following treatments within the specified time periods prior to screening procedures: any type of non-hormonal vulvovaginal treatment in the 7 days (including cosmetics expected to have an impact on vaginal pH such as special feminine wash gels); phytoestrogens by any route within 1 month; vaginal hormone therapy within 1 month; hormone therapy (estrogen alone, progestin alone or estrogen/progestin combination) by oral, intrauterine or transdermal route within 2 months; progestational implants, estrogen, or estrogen/progestational injectable within 3 months; estrogen pellet therapy or progestin injectable drug therapy within 6 months; percutaneous estrogen lotions or gels within 1 month; testosterone or testosterone derivatives, DHEA, tibolone, or SERMs by any route within 2 months;
  13. Subjects receiving antiepileptic drugs (barbiturates, hydantoins, carbamazepine), certain antibiotics and other antiinfective medicinal products; phenylbutazone; preparations based on medicinal plants that contain St. John's Wort.
  14. Subjects who are allergic to any of the components of the medication under study.
  15. Subjects who are currently participating or have participated in the experimental evaluation of any product within 8 weeks of the start of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 0.005% estriol vaginal gel
Vaginal. Administration by an applicator inserted deep inside the vagina Dose: 1 g of gel, containing 50 Mcg of estriol Dosage schedule: Weeks 1-3: single daily application Weeks 4-12: twice weekly administration
Experimental: 0.002% estriol vaginal gel
Vaginal. Administration by an applicator inserted deep inside the vagina Dose: 1 g of gel, containing 50 Mcg of estriol Dosage schedule: Weeks 1-3: single daily application Weeks 4-12: twice weekly administration
Experimental: 0.0008% estriol vaginal gel
Vaginal. Administration by an applicator inserted deep inside the vagina Dose: 1 g of gel, containing 50 Mcg of estriol Dosage schedule: Weeks 1-3: single daily application Weeks 4-12: twice weekly administration
Placebo Comparator: estriol vaginal gel
Vaginal. Administration by an applicator inserted deep inside the vagina Dose: 1 g of gel, containing 50 Mcg of estriol Dosage schedule: Weeks 1-3: single daily application Weeks 4-12: twice weekly administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Vaginal Dryness
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects with change from baseline to week 12 in the severity of vaginal dryness was reported. Severity was defined as: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
From baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH was reported. A decrease in pH compare to Baseline represents a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Proportion of Superficial Cells of the Vaginal Epithelium.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline to week 12 in the proportion of superficial cells of the vaginal epithelium was reported.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Proportion of Parabasal Cells of the Vaginal Epithelium.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the proportion of parabasal cells of the vaginal epithelium was reported. A decrease in proportion of parabasal cells compared to Baseline represents a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Dyspareunia
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from baseline to week 12 in the severity of dyspareunia was reported. Dyspareunia was only applicable in subjects who had experienced sexual activity with penetration since the previous study visit. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Pruritus or Itching
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with cvhange from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of pruritus or itching was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Burning
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of burning was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Dysuria
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of dysuria was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive putcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Global Symptom Score 1
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Global Symptom Score 1 was defined as the sum of all 5 individual symptom scores at a given visit, and was calculated only when all 5 symptom scores had a response available. the Global Symptom Score 1 ranged at Screening/Baseline between 2 (at least moderate vaginal dryness -per inclusion criteria) to 15 (all 5 studied symptoms severe in intensity). At Week 12/ET visit, the Global Symptom Score ranged between 0 (no symptoms) and 15 (all symptoms severe in intensity). A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Global Symptom Score 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the Global Symptom Score 2 was reported. Global Symptom Score 2 was defined as the sum of all 4 individual symptoms excluding dyspareunia (vaginal dryness, pruritus or itching, burning, and dysuria) for each subject at each time point: Screening/Baseline, Week 3 and Week 12/ET., and was calculated only when all 4 symptom scores had a response available. The maximum score possible to be obtained at a visit with the Global Symptom Score 2 was 12 (all symptoms severe in intensity). A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Pallor.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of pallor was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive putcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Friability
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of friability was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Thinning or Flattening of Folds
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of thinning or flattening of folds was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Petechiae
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of presence of petechiae was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Severity of Dry Mucosa
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of dry mucosa was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Vaginal Dryness
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in the severity of vaginal dryness was reported. Severity was defined as: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Dyspareunia
Time Frame: From baseline to week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of dyspareunia was reported. Dyspareunia was only applicable in subjects who had experienced sexual activity with penetration since the previous study visit. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
From baseline to week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Pruritus or Itching
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in the severity of pruritus or itching was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Burning
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of burning was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Dysuria
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of dysuria was reported. Symptom scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Global Symptom Score 1
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Global Symptom Score 1 was defined as the sum of all 5 individual symptom scores at a given visit, and was calculated only when all 5 symptom scores had a response available. the Global Symptom Score 1 ranged at Screening/Baseline between 2 (at least moderate vaginal dryness -per inclusion criteria) to 15 (all 5 studied symptoms severe in intensity). At Week 3 visit, the Global Symptom Score ranged between 0 (no symptoms) and 15 (all symptoms severe in intensity). A decrease in score compared to Baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Global Symptom Score 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Change from Baseline to Week 3 in the Global Symptom Score 2 was reported. Global Symptom Score 2 was defined as the sum of all 4 individual symptoms excluding dyspareunia (vaginal dryness, pruritus or itching, burning, and dysuria) for each subject at each time point: Screening/Baseline, Week 3 and Week 12/ET., and was calculated only when all 4 symptom scores had a response available. The maximum score possible to be obtained at a visit with the Global Symptom Score 2 was 12 (all symptoms severe in intensity). A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Pallor
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of pallor was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Friability
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of friability was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Thinning or Flattening of Folds
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of thinning or flattening of folds was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Presence of Petechiae
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in the severity of presence of petechiae was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Severity of Dry Mucosa
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Percentage of subjects with change from Baseline to Week 3 in severity of dry mucosa was reported. Sign scores at each visit: 0= Absent, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. A decrease in score compared to baseline represented a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in Vaginal pH
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Change from Baseline to Week 3 in vaginal pH was reported. A decrease in pH compared to Baseline represents a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Proportion of Superficial Cells of the Vaginal Epithelium
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Change from baseline to week 3 in the proportion of superficial cells of the vaginal epithelium was reported.
Baseline to Week 3
Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Proportion of Parabasal Cells of the Vaginal Epithelium
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 3
Change from Baseline to Week 3 in the proportion of parabasal cells of the vaginal epithelium was reported. A decrease in proportion of parabasal cells compared to baseline represents a positive outcome.
Baseline to Week 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ITFE-2092-C1
  • 2015-005787-42 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe