Simplified Pilates Training in Older Adults in Hong Kong

November 17, 2022 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The Efficacy of a Simplified Pilates Exercise Training in Reducing the Risk of Falling in Hong Kong's Older Adults: A Wait-list Randomised Controlled Trial

This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. It is hypothesized that a simplified Pilates exercise programme is efficacious in reducing the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) in Hong Kong's older adults who are at a medium to high risk of falling. There is no updated research that has specifically investigated an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme and no research investigated it in Hong Kong as well. Therefore, this study is novel and important in investigating the efficacy of an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme in Hong Kong's older population specifically developed for reducing the risk of falls. It could increase the intelligent choices of efficacious and easy-to-comply-with fall prevention exercise programmes (the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme) for older adults and reduce the impact of falls in the older population. The more the choices of simple and efficacious fall prevention programmes that are available for older adults, the more likely it is that they will be interested in complying with the programme. Consequently, this research could provide evidence of Pilates being used in fall prevention of older adults locally and globally.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will be a randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme (developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong in our completed pilot study) by comparing it with the wait-list control.

A total of 60 older adults will be recruited from different collaborating community elderly and rehabilitation centres in Hong Kong using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria will be the following: (1) age 65 or above and (2) score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). The exclusion criteria will be the following: (1) total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C), (2) presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit, (3) presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training, and (4) inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.

The participants (N = 60) will be randomly assigned using concealed block randomisation by an independent person through a sealed and opaque envelope system to either the simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG; n = 30) or the wait-list control group (WLCG; n = 30). A computerised random-number generator will be utilised to prepare an allocation schedule. The participants in the SPEG will partake in exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. All the training sessions will be conducted in Hong Kong by two experienced and certified Pilates trainers under the supervision of a registered physiotherapist. The participants in the SPEG will practise the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme. The WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between.

To examine the efficacy of the exercise programme, the participants of both the SPEG and WLCG will undergo two assessment sessions before training at baseline (T0) and just after the completion of all the exercise sessions (T1). In the baseline assessment (T0), a structural questionnaire will be used to ask the participants for their demographic information, detailed information regarding any previous falls, detailed medical history, use of prescribed drugs, social history, and socio-economic status. Following this, a series of assessments will be conducted to examine their balance ability, which will be measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS; primary outcome measure), and other physical and psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measures) in the two assessment sessions (T0 & T1). Any adverse events will be reported and tracked. Participants will also be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between T0 and T1 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls (secondary outcome measure) will then be collected at T1.

Balance ability (primary outcome measure) will be assessed using the BBS. Regarding the other physical fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), flexibility will be measured using the 'sit-and-reach' (S&R) test. A functional gait and balance assessment will be conducted using the POMA and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests.

On the other hand, for the assessment of the psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), the MMSE-C will be used as a screening tool to examine the preliminary cognitive function at the beginning of training. Depression levels will be assessed using the Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C). Anxiety levels will be measured using the valid and reliable Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC & STAI-TC). The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)] will be utilised to assess the fear of falling. The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)] will be used to evaluate balance confidence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
        • Contact:
          • Thomson Wong, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 99 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 65 or above;
  2. score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C);
  2. presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit;
  3. presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training;
  4. inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG)
The participants in the SPEG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions.
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme was developed by a group of experienced Pilates and rehabilitation experts from our completed pilot work.
Other: Wait-list control group (WLCG)
The participants in the WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions.
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme was developed by a group of experienced Pilates and rehabilitation experts from our completed pilot work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Balance Ability
Time Frame: Day 0
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Day 0
Change from Baseline Balance Ability at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Flexibility
Time Frame: Day 0
Sit-and-reach (S&R) test
Day 0
Change from Baseline Flexibility at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Sit-and-reach (S&R) test
Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment
Time Frame: Day 0
The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Day 0
Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests
Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait Assessment at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests
Week 12
Preliminary Cognitive Function
Time Frame: Day 0
The Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C)
Day 0
Baseline Depression Levels
Time Frame: Day 0
The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)
Day 0
Change from Baseline Depression Levels at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)
Week 12
Baseline Anxiety Levels
Time Frame: Day 0
The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC & STAI-TC)
Day 0
Change from Baseline Anxiety Levels at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC & STAI-TC)
Week 12
Baseline Fear of Falling
Time Frame: Day 0
The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]
Day 0
Change from Baseline Fear of Falling at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]
Week 12
Baseline Balance Confidence
Time Frame: Day 0
The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]
Day 0
Change from Baseline Balance Confidence at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]
Week 12
Frequency of falls
Time Frame: Week 12
Participants will be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between Day 0 and Week 12 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls will be collected at Week 12.
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aged

Clinical Trials on The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme

3
Subscribe