Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept in Combination With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy

October 26, 2023 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept SC With Standard Treatment Compared to Standard Treatment Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (IIM)

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept subcutaneous (SC) in Combination With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

149

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Local Institution - 0051
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Local Institution - 0053
    • Queensland
      • Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia, 4066
        • Local Institution - 0035
    • Western Australia
      • Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia, 6150
        • Local Institution - 0036
      • Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-000
        • Local Institution - 0067
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04032-060
        • Local Institution - 0071
    • Bahia
      • Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 40150150
        • Local Institution - 0073
    • Espirito Santo
      • Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil, 29055-450
        • Local Institution - 0070
    • Minas Gerais
      • Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 36010570
        • Local Institution - 0069
    • RIO Grande DO SUL
      • Porto Alegre, RIO Grande DO SUL, Brazil, 90480-000
        • Local Institution - 0072
    • SAO Paulo
      • Bairro Jardim, SAO Paulo, Brazil, 09090-790
        • Local Institution - 0074
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Local Institution - 0029
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Local Institution - 0100
      • Clermont Ferrand Cedex 1, France, 63000
        • Local Institution - 0045
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59037
        • Local Institution - 0043
      • Paris, France, 75651
        • Local Institution - 0042
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Local Institution - 0044
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Local Institution - 0027
      • Halle (saale), Germany, 06120
        • Local Institution - 0054
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22763
        • Local Institution - 0028
      • Munchen, Germany, 80336
        • Local Institution - 0030
      • Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • Local Institution - 0031
      • Firenze, Italy, 50139
        • Local Institution - 0024
      • Padova, Italy, 35128
        • Local Institution - 0020
      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Local Institution - 0025
    • Lombardia
      • Pavia, Lombardia, Italy, 27100
        • Local Institution - 0023
      • Miyagi, Japan, 980-8574
        • Local Institution - 0076
    • Fukuoka
      • Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, 807-8555
        • Local Institution - 0091
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8648
        • Local Institution - 0078
      • Sapporo-City, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0011
        • Local Institution - 0090
    • Ibaraki
      • Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, 3058576
        • Local Institution - 0082
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 2168511
        • Local Institution - 0083
    • Kumamoto
      • Kumamoto-city, Kumamoto, Japan, 8608556
        • Local Institution - 0084
    • Nagasaki
      • Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki, Japan, 8528501
        • Local Institution - 0088
      • Sasebo city, Nagasaki, Japan, 857-1195
        • Local Institution
    • Saitama
      • Iruma-gun, Saitama, Japan, 3500495
        • Local Institution - 0077
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 1138603
        • Local Institution - 0079
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8519
        • Local Institution - 0086
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 104-8560
        • Local Institution - 0081
      • Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan, 1628666
        • Local Institution - 0093
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 1608582
        • Local Institution - 0092
    • Yamaguchi
      • Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan, 755-8505
        • Local Institution - 0087
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02447
        • Local Institution - 0066
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Local Institution - 0065
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 04763
        • Local Institution - 0064
      • San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 78213
        • Local Institution - 0047
      • San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 78290
        • Local Institution - 0052
    • Distrito Federal
      • Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 11850
        • Local Institution - 0046
      • Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06700
        • Local Institution - 0049
    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44160
        • Local Institution - 0048
      • Lund, Sweden, 22242
        • Local Institution - 0040
      • Orebro, Sweden, 70185
        • Local Institution - 0041
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 17176
        • Local Institution - 0037
      • Vasteras, Sweden, 72189
        • Local Institution - 0038
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85028
        • Local Institution - 0015
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Local Institution - 0075
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Local Institution - 0012
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • Local Institution - 0057
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33309
        • Local Institution - 0018
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Local Institution - 0013
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Local Institution - 0006
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University -Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Local Institution - 0058
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Local Institution - 0089
    • Minnesota
      • Eagan, Minnesota, United States, 55121
        • Local Institution - 0002
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-3025
        • Local Institution - 0011
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Local Institution - 0004
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Local Institution - 0097
    • North Carolina
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
        • Local Institution - 0010
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
        • Local Institution - 0056
      • Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States, 44130
        • Local Institution - 0094
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73072
        • Local Institution - 0059
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
        • Local Institution - 0055
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Local Institution - 0014
    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Local Institution - 0005
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Local Institution - 0017
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • Local Institution - 0096
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Local Institution - 0016
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Local Institution - 0095

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Diagnosis of IIM based on the Bohan and Peter classification criteria: i) Subjects with dermatomyositis (DM) must also have a confirmed myositis-associated rash (Gottron's papules or a heliotrope rash preferably confirmed by skin biopsy) and 2 or more of the remaining 4 criteria.

ii) Subjects with a diagnosis of IIM other than DM include PM, autoimmune necrotizing myopathy, myositis in association with another connective tissue disease (overlap myositis) and juvenile myositis subjects above the age of 18. These subjects must have a prior muscle biopsy diagnostic for IIM or a positive test for at least one myositis-specific autoantibody (anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, KS, Zo, YRS), anti-Mi-2, anti-SRP, anti-TIF1-g, anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA5, anti-SAE, anti-HMGCR). For subjects with overlap myositis, the myositis must be the principal clinically active manifestation of their disease. Where applicable, documentation of prior skin biopsy, muscle biopsy, and autoantibody results must be obtained and retained by the site.

  • Demonstrable muscle weakness measured by the MMT-8 of ≤ 135 units and any 3 of the following: i) MMT-8 ≤ 125 units; ii) Physician's global assessment (PGA) visual analog scale (VAS) ≥2 cm; iii) Subject's global assessment (SGA) VAS ≥2 cm; iv) HAQ-DI ≥ 0.5; v) One or more muscle enzyme (CK, aldolase, LDH, AST, ALT) ³ 1.3 times upper limit of normal (ULN); vi) MDAAT Extramuscular Global Activity VAS ≥2 cm
  • Demonstration of currently active IIM will be determined by an adjudication committee unless the subject has any one of the following: i) an active myositis-associated rash (Gottron's papules or heliotrope rash), or ii) a recent (within 3 months prior to signing informed consent) biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or electromyogram (EMG) demonstrating active disease, or iii) an elevated CK > 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Active disease despite prior treatment with corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or biologics as determined by the investigator
  • The subject must be on background standard treatment for IIM. The standard treatments that are allowed as background treatment for IIM includes: i) Corticosteroids alone, or ii) One of the following immunosuppressants: methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, or cyclosporine (combinations of these treatments are not allowed), or iii) A combination of corticosteroids and one of the above immunosuppressants. The subject must have been on the same medication(s) for IIM for 12 weeks prior to randomization and the dose must have been stable for 4 weeks prior to randomization. If using azathioprine, the subject must have been on azathioprine for at least 24 weeks with a stable dose for at least 12 weeks prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM), or myositis other than IIM, eg, drug-induced myositis and PM associated with HIV
  • Subjects treated with penicillamine or zidovudine in the past 3 months
  • Subjects treated with rituximab in the 6 months prior to randomization (there must be laboratory results indicating the presence of circulating B cells [CD19+]). Any other biologic treatment in the past 3 months or immune globulin (intravenous [IVIG] or subcutaneous [SCIG]) in the past 3 months prior to randomization
  • Subjects with uncontrolled or rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease
  • Subjects with severe muscle damage (Myositis Damage Index > 7/10), permanent weakness due to a non-IIM cause, or myositis with cardiac involvement
  • Cancer-associated myositis (myositis diagnosed within 2 years of a diagnosis of cancer
  • Subjects who are known to be positive for the anti-TIF-1 (p155/140) autoantibody prior to randomization who were diagnosed with IIM < 1 year prior to randomization.
  • Subjects at risk for tuberculosis
  • Subjects with recent acute infection requiring antibiotics
  • Subjects with history of chronic or recurrent bacterial, viral or systemic fungal infections
  • Subjects who have a present malignancy or have had a previous malignancy within the last 5 years prior to screening (except for a documented history of cured non-metastatic squamous or basal cell skin carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ).

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Abatacept subcutaneous + Standard Treatment
Abatacept subcutaneous weekly in addition to the subject's current standard treatment for 24 weeks followed by a 28 week open-label period of abatacept treatment plus the subject's current standard treatment.
Specified dose of Abatacept subcutaneous on specified days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous + Standard Treatment
Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous weekly in addition to the subject's current standard treatment for 24 weeks followed by a 28 week open-label period of abatacept treatment plus the subject's current standard treatment.
Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue
Time Frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

The number of participants who achieve IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) without rescue medication at week 24.

The IMACS DOI is: An improvement of >/= 20% from baseline in 3 IMACS core measures, no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by >/= 25% from baseline, and no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by >/= 25% from baseline.

IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity.

From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Muscle Endurance Using the Myositis Function Index (FI-2) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

The adjusted mean change from baseline in Myositis FI-2 scores is assessing muscle endurance impairment by testing specific muscle groups. The 3 Score average includes shoulder flexion, hip flexion, and head lift. Each muscle group is scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 maximal number of repetitions.

The total score is based on hip flexion, shoulder flexion (R/L) and neck divided by 3 (range 0-60 repetitions).

From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Mean Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). HAQ-DI is a patient-reported outcome measuring disability by asking a total of 20 questions in eight categories of function: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. If an aid or device is used or if help is required from another individual, then the minimum score for that section is 2. The highest component score in each category determines the score for the category and scores are averaged to give the disability index. The HAQ scale ranges from 0 (no difficulties) to 3 (unable to do).
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Mean Change in Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Assessment of Extra-muscular From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) assessment of extra-muscular uses a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale. This VAS assesses the overall extra-muscular clinical features based upon: 1) The presence of clinical features or symptoms within the previous 4 weeks that are due to active disease. 2) The judgment that the feature is due to the myositis disease process. 3) The concept that disease activity is defined as a potentially reversible finding. 4) A clinical, functional, and laboratory assessments.

The scoring is performed by the investigator and ranges from 0 (absent extra-muscular disease activity) to 100 (maximum extra-muscular disease activity).

From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) Total Improvement Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

The Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) is a continuous total improvement score from baseline (range 0-100) based on the sum of the absolute percent change in the 6 core domains (weighted) used in the IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement)

IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity.

The total improvement score ranges between 0 and 100 percent corresponds to the degree of improvement, with higher scores corresponding to a greater degree of improvement ( >/= 20 represents minimal improvement, a score of >/= 40 represents moderate improvement, and a score of >/= 60 represents major improvement).

From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
Time Frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Open-Label Period
Time Frame: From first dose in open label period to first dose date in the subsequent period or up to 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 666 days)
The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and before the first dose date in the subsequent period are included. For participants who prematurely discontinue the open-label period or complete the open-label period but do not enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and up to 56 days post last dose are included.
From first dose in open label period to first dose date in the subsequent period or up to 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 666 days)
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Long-Term Open Label Period
Time Frame: From first dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period (up to approximately 958 days)
The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who completed/discontinued the Long-Term Extension Period, assessments after the first dose in the Long-Term Extension Period and up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Extension Period are included.
From first dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period (up to approximately 958 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

November 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dermatomyositis

Clinical Trials on Abatacept subcutaneous

3
Subscribe