- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02998372
Computational Simulation of Patellar Instability
May 24, 2019 updated by: John Elias, PhD, Akron General Medical Center
Computational Simulation of Dynamic Motion for Knees With Patellar Instability to Compare MPFL Reconstruction to Tibial Tuberosity Medialization as a Function of Knee Anatomy
Computational simulation will be performed to represent motion of knees with a dislocating kneecap.
Common surgical treatment methods will be simulated and anatomical parameters commonly associated with the dislocation will be varied in order to characterize the most appropriate surgical approach as a function of knee anatomy.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The two most common stabilization procedures for patients with recurrent patellar instability are reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medialization of the tibial tuberosity.
MPFL reconstruction has been growing in popularity, due in large part to the technical demands of tibial tuberosity realignment and concerns related to bone healing across the osteotomy.
In cases of severe trochlear dysplasia and/or a dramatically lateralized tibial tuberosity, an MPFL graft tensioned according to current standards may not provide sufficient resistance to limit lateral patellar tracking that causes continued instability.
Increasing graft tension could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage.
The proposed study is based on the hypothesis that the ability of MPFL reconstruction to effectively limit lateral patellar maltracking decreases as trochlear dysplasia and the lateral position of the tibial tuberosity increase.
Computational dynamic simulation of knee function will be performed to establish anatomical standards for which tibial tuberosity medicalization is more likely than MPFL reconstruction to limit patellar maltracking without overloading patellofemoral cartilage.
The first specific aim is to computationally replicate lateral patellar maltracking and pressure applied to cartilage during function for patients being treated for patellar instability.
Multibody dynamics knee models representing patients being treated for recurrent patellar instability will be based on 3D reconstructions from MRI scans.
The modeling technique treats the bones and cartilage surfaces as rigid bodies with Hertzian contact determining contact forces and guiding joint motion.
Discrete element analysis techniques will be used to characterize contact pressure patterns based on overlap of cartilage surfaces.
Models will be individually validated by comparing output to in vivo data.
The source of the in vivo data will be computational reconstruction of in vivo function based on motions performed by the patients who provide the imaging data for model development.
The second specific aim will be to computationally characterize the influence of surgical stabilization on knee function for individual patients.
MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity medialization, each with variations in surgical parameters, will be simulated.
The actual surgical procedures performed on the patients will be simulated, with the influence on lateral tracking compared to in vivo results to validate the representation of the surgical procedures.
The third specific aim will be to compare surgical options as a function of patellofemoral anatomy.
Variations in patellar tracking and pressure applied to cartilage will be compared between MPFL reconstruction and tuberosity medialization.
In addition, techniques to parametrically alter trochlear dysplasia and tuberosity lateralization within the models will be developed.
Simulations will be performed while varying anatomy to set ranges over which each surgical option can limit patellar maltracking without elevating contact pressures.
The modeling system will be available for future studies addressing additional surgical options and anatomical parameters related to patellar instability.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Akron, Ohio, United States, 44308-1046
- Akron Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 89 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Anyone with a diagnosis of recurrent patellar dislocation to be surgically treated at Akron Children's Hospital
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of recurrent patellar dislocation
- Plan to be surgically treated at Akron Children's Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Additional Injuries unrelated to patellar instability for the knee of interest
- Implantation of metallic hardware that could cause artifacts within MRI scans
- Inability to remain still during MRI scans
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Graphical representation of changes in knee motion due to surgery
Time Frame: 16 months
|
Computational models will be developed from MRI scans to show pre-operative and post-operative motion patterns for knees with instability
|
16 months
|
|
Computational simulation of changes in knee motion due to surgery
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The models used to display motion will be converted to dynamic simulation models to predict the influence of multiple surgical approaches on knee motion
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Influence of anatomy on surgical effectiveness
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The simulation models will be used to relate the effectiveness of each procedure to the anatomy of the knees
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Elias, PhD, Akron General Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ. Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):1478-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546506287486. Epub 2006 May 9.
- Biyani R, Elias JJ, Saranathan A, Feng H, Guseila LM, Morscher MA, Jones KC. Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2334-41. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3195-y. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
- Elias JJ, Carrino JA, Saranathan A, Guseila LM, Tanaka MJ, Cosgarea AJ. Variations in kinematics and function following patellar stabilization including tibial tuberosity realignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2350-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2905-9. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
- Purevsuren T, Elias JJ, Kim K, Kim YH. Dynamic simulation of tibial tuberosity realignment: model evaluation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18(14):1606-10. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2014.936857. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
- Fitzpatrick CK, Steensen RN, Tumuluri A, Trinh T, Bentley J, Rullkoetter PJ. Computational analysis of factors contributing to patellar dislocation. J Orthop Res. 2016 Mar;34(3):444-53. doi: 10.1002/jor.23041. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
- Elias JJ, Saranathan A. Discrete element analysis for characterizing the patellofemoral pressure distribution: model evaluation. J Biomech Eng. 2013 Aug;135(8):81011. doi: 10.1115/1.4024287.
- Guess TM, Liu H, Bhashyam S, Thiagarajan G. A multibody knee model with discrete cartilage prediction of tibio-femoral contact mechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013;16(3):256-70. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2011.617004. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
- Guess TM, Thiagarajan G, Kia M, Mishra M. A subject specific multibody model of the knee with menisci. Med Eng Phys. 2010 Jun;32(5):505-15. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.02.020. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
- Elias JJ, Kelly MJ, Smith KE, Gall KA, Farr J. Dynamic Simulation of the Effects of Graft Fixation Errors During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Sep 20;4(9):2325967116665080. doi: 10.1177/2325967116665080. eCollection 2016 Sep.
- Elias JJ, Soehnlen NT, Guseila LM, Cosgarea AJ. Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy in patellar instability. Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
May 30, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 31, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 31, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 16, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 20, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
May 28, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 24, 2019
Last Verified
May 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 110908
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patellar Instability
-
Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziRecruiting
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkMayo Clinic; Oregon Health and Science University; Inova Medical GroupEnrolling by invitationPatellar Instability
-
Université de SherbrookeActive, not recruiting
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedPatellar InstabilitySwitzerland
-
Hannover Medical SchoolCompletedPatellar Instability | Patellar LuxationGermany
-
Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteCompletedThe Comprehensive Assessment in Children After Surgical Treatment of Patellar Recurrent Dislocation.Recurrent Patellar Dislocation | Patellar InstabilityPoland
-
State University of New York at BuffaloCarestream Health, Inc.CompletedPatellar (or Kneecap) Instability and Mal-alignmentUnited States
-
Ramsay Générale de SantéEuropean Clinical Trial Experts Network; Dr Vincent ChassaingCompletedPatellar Dislocation | Patellar InstabilityFrance
-
Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteCompletedPatellofemoral Osteoarthritis | Recurrent Patellar Dislocation | Patellar InstabilityPoland
-
Decathlon SEEFOR, FranceRecruitingPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome | Patellar InstabilityFrance
Clinical Trials on patellar stabilization
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Sykehuset Innlandet HFCompleted
-
University of AlbertaSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedTotal Knee ReplacementCanada
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingRecurrent Patellar DislocationChina
-
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, ThailandCompletedOsteoarthritis, KneeThailand
-
Gulhane Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Navamindradhiraj UniversityCompletedPatellar Crepitus | Vibroacoustic SignalThailand
-
Peking University Third HospitalUnknown
-
Hawler Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Finnish Defense ForcesCompleted