Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia

June 26, 2020 updated by: Xiangbin Xing, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Safety, Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia

POEM is a new intervention for the treatment of achalasia and has been reported to relieve the dysphagia symptom effectively. Although the cost of POEM method is less than the method of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Fundoplication, it is still of an economic burden for the patients with achalasia. In this trial, investigators plan to use snare to assist POEM procedure, to observe the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this method, compared with other knifes-assisted procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-70 years
  • Diagnosed as achalasia base on high resolution manometry, barium esophagram and Upper endoscopy
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class > Ⅲ
  • Previous endoscopic or surgical treatment for achalasia
  • Esophageal malignancy
  • Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: snare group
snare-assisted POEM

POEM is performed by using a snare which is retracted into the sheath to expose the tip, leaving a 1-2mm length for operation.

  1. After submucosal injection, an initial 2-cm mucosal incision is made by a snare in the posterior esophageal wall.
  2. A submucosal tunnel from the esophagus to the gastric cardia is created using a snare.
  3. Full-thickness myotomy is performed and extended 2-3 cm beyond the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) using a snare.
  4. The mucosal incision is closed with endoclips.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional group
knife-assisted POEM

POEM is performed by using a conventional endoscopic knife.

  1. After submucosal injection, an initial 2-cm mucosal incision is made by a knife in the posterior esophageal wall.
  2. A submucosal tunnel from the esophagus to the gastric cardia is created using a knife.
  3. Full-thickness myotomy is performed and extended 2-3 cm beyond the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) using a knife.
  4. The mucosal incision is closed with endoclips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success rates
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
Clinical success is defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3 without additional treatment (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
12 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months after treatment
Adverse events are defined and graded according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon (Cotton PB et al, Gastrointest Endosc 2010). Incidental findings of pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pleural effusion on postoperative imaging, and subcutaneous emphysema were documented while not considered as adverse events.
baseline to 12 months after treatment
Procedure time
Time Frame: POEM procedure
Procedure time is measured from the start of submucosal injection until mucosal entry closure.
POEM procedure
The volume of intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: POEM procedure
POEM procedure
The use of hemostatic forceps
Time Frame: POEM procedure
POEM procedure
Postoperative pain requiring the use of tramadol
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
Pain related to POEM procedure requiring the use of tramadol pain medication.
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
The length of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
Total hospital costs of treatment per participants
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
Eckardt score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
The Eckardt score assesses the severity of achalasia symptoms by combining the sum of symptom frequency scores for dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain and a weight loss score. Each component can be graded from 0 to 3 points. The total range is 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Manometry parameters
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
Manometry parameters include lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high resolution manometry.
baseline and 3 months after treatment
Maximum esophageal diameter on barium esophagram
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
baseline and 3 months after treatment
Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
The GerdQ has been developed as a tool to facilitate the symptom-based diagnosis of GERD. Scores ranging from 0 to 3 were applied for the four positive predictors (heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance due to reflux symptoms and use of over-the-counter medications for reflux symptoms) and from 3 to 0 for two negative predictors (epigastric pain and nausea). The GerdQ score was calculated as the sum of these scores, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 18. A total GerdQ score >7 is considered indicative of significant GERD symptoms (Jones R et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009).
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
Reflux esophagitis on post-POEM endoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
The severity of reflux esophagitis is graded according to the Los Angeles classification (Armstrong D et al, Gastroenterology 1996).
3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Xiangbin Xing, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Achalasia

Clinical Trials on snare-assisted POEM

Subscribe