- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02999451
Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia
June 26, 2020 updated by: Xiangbin Xing, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Safety, Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia
POEM is a new intervention for the treatment of achalasia and has been reported to relieve the dysphagia symptom effectively.
Although the cost of POEM method is less than the method of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Fundoplication, it is still of an economic burden for the patients with achalasia.
In this trial, investigators plan to use snare to assist POEM procedure, to observe the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this method, compared with other knifes-assisted procedure.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
75
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
- First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18-70 years
- Diagnosed as achalasia base on high resolution manometry, barium esophagram and Upper endoscopy
- Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class > Ⅲ
- Previous endoscopic or surgical treatment for achalasia
- Esophageal malignancy
- Pregnant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: snare group
snare-assisted POEM
|
POEM is performed by using a snare which is retracted into the sheath to expose the tip, leaving a 1-2mm length for operation.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional group
knife-assisted POEM
|
POEM is performed by using a conventional endoscopic knife.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical success rates
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
|
Clinical success is defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3 without additional treatment (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
|
12 months after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months after treatment
|
Adverse events are defined and graded according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon (Cotton PB et al, Gastrointest Endosc 2010).
Incidental findings of pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pleural effusion on postoperative imaging, and subcutaneous emphysema were documented while not considered as adverse events.
|
baseline to 12 months after treatment
|
|
Procedure time
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
Procedure time is measured from the start of submucosal injection until mucosal entry closure.
|
POEM procedure
|
|
The volume of intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
POEM procedure
|
|
|
The use of hemostatic forceps
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
POEM procedure
|
|
|
Postoperative pain requiring the use of tramadol
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
Pain related to POEM procedure requiring the use of tramadol pain medication.
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
|
The length of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
|
|
|
Total hospital costs of treatment per participants
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
|
|
Eckardt score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
The Eckardt score assesses the severity of achalasia symptoms by combining the sum of symptom frequency scores for dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain and a weight loss score.
Each component can be graded from 0 to 3 points.
The total range is 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
|
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
|
Manometry parameters
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
Manometry parameters include lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high resolution manometry.
|
baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
|
Maximum esophageal diameter on barium esophagram
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
The GerdQ has been developed as a tool to facilitate the symptom-based diagnosis of GERD.
Scores ranging from 0 to 3 were applied for the four positive predictors (heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance due to reflux symptoms and use of over-the-counter medications for reflux symptoms) and from 3 to 0 for two negative predictors (epigastric pain and nausea).
The GerdQ score was calculated as the sum of these scores, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 18.
A total GerdQ score >7 is considered indicative of significant GERD symptoms (Jones R et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009).
|
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
|
Reflux esophagitis on post-POEM endoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
|
The severity of reflux esophagitis is graded according to the Los Angeles classification (Armstrong D et al, Gastroenterology 1996).
|
3 months after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Xiangbin Xing, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 31, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
December 31, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 20, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 21, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
June 30, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 26, 2020
Last Verified
June 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 123 (Giresun University Scientific Research Project)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Esophageal Achalasia
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruitingEsophageal Motility Disorders | AchalasiaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedAchalasia | Esophageal Achalasia | Achalasia, EsophagealUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Federico II UniversityRecruitingAchalasia | Indocyanine Green | Indocyanine Green (ICG) | Achalasia, EsophagealItaly
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingAchalasia | Achalasia CardiaEgypt
-
Federico II UniversityCompleted
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaCompleted
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityRecruitingDysphagia | Cricopharyngeal AchalasiaChina
-
Copka SonpashanNot yet recruitingCricopharyngeal Achalasia
Clinical Trials on snare-assisted POEM
-
Dr Milutin BulajicCompleted
-
Shandong UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
AdventHealthMayo Clinic; University of South FloridaCompleted
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalUnknownEsophageal AchalasiaChina
-
Technical University of MunichNot yet recruiting
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompleted
-
Showa Inan General HospitalCompletedPostpolypectomy Bleeding | Diminutive Colorectal Polyp | Cold Snare Polypectomy | Polypectomy Snare | Complete Resection RateJapan
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalNinghai Second Hospital; The Third People's Hospital Health Care Group of Cixi and other collaboratorsCompletedHaemorrhage | Pedunculated Colorectal PolypsChina
-
Benizelion General HospitalCompleted
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalUnknown