Prenatal Counseling in Extreme Prematurity: Parents' View (PreCo-parents)

May 24, 2016 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

This study is part of the PreCo study, evaluating Dutch care in (imminent) extreme preterm birth including current and preferred counseling, barriers and facilitators for preferred counseling from both obstetricians and neonatologists, as well as parents' views on this.

Since 2010, intensive care can be offered in the Netherlands at 24+0 weeks gestation (with parental consent) but as some international guidelines, the Dutch guideline lacks detailed recommendations on organization, content and preferred decision-making of the counselling.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The anticipated delivery of an infant at the limits of viability presents parents and professionals with medical, ethical and emotional issues; especially when a decision on the initiation of care has to be made. Since the first publication in 2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics several (albeit different) guidelines and recommendations on periviability counseling have been published. However, there is no universally accepted way of performing prenatal counseling and, consequently, studies describe heterogeneous counseling practices worldwide.

Some guidelines on resuscitation at the limits of viability include recommendations on the parental involvement in the decision-making. Nevertheless, the extent of involvement and the gestational age (GA) at which parents should be involved varies. In 2010, the Dutch guideline on perinatal practice in extremely premature delivery lowered the limit offering intensive care from 25+0 to 24+0 weeks GA. Just as some international guidelines include a role for parents at the limits of viability, the Dutch guideline states that at 24 weeks GA informed consent of parents is required when initiating intensive care28. Although the guideline acknowledges the importance of prenatal counseling, recommendations on organization, content or decision-making of the counseling are very limited.

Although recommendations on counseling do exist, they may not be generally applicable in the Netherlands since cross-cultural differences in perinatal practices, healthcare organization, and physician and patient views are likely to exist. To compose a national framework on prenatal counseling at the limits of viability, the nationwide PreCo study (Prenatal Counseling in Prematurity) was designed, examining both professional and parental views. High quality of care originates when no differences exist between preferred and current counseling with uniformity between the involved caregivers (obstetricians and neonatologists) and specified to the needs of those receiving counseling, being the parents The PreCo study amongst parents has three major aims

  1. to find initial preferences among Dutch experienced parents on prenatal counseling at the limits of viability (quantitatively)
  2. to evaluate decision-making among Dutch experienced parents at the limits of viability (quantitatively)
  3. to perform in-depth exploration of counseling preferences amongst Dutch parents (qualitatively)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of the cohort 01-10-2010 to 01-10-2013 of parents who were confronted with the birth of an extremely preterm infant with a gestational age between 24 and 25 weeks, after the introduction of the new Dutch guideline in October 2010.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study population consists of the cohort 01-10-2010 to 01-10-2013 of parents who were confronted with the birth of an extremely preterm infant with a gestational age between 24 and 25 weeks, after the introduction of the new Dutch guideline in October 2010.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • birth at 24-25 weeks of gestation due to active termination of pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Survey and interviews

*part one* (quantitative)

Survey on:

A. prenatal counseling at the limits of viability, within three domains of interest:

  • organization of prenatal counseling
  • content of prenatal counseling
  • decision-making in prenatal counseling Domains used to evaluate current counseling and counseling preferences

B. decision-making at the limits of viability: evaluation of the made decision (decisional conflict and regret)

*part two* (qualitative)

Individual interviews (qualitative) to in-depth explore preferences in prenatal counseling

  • insight in the specific preferred content of prenatal counseling.
  • study influencing factors on preferences in the domains of organization and decision-making.

all participants: survey on prenatal counseling and treatment decisions at the limits of viability.

a selection of participants: individual interviews to further perform in-depth exploration of prenatal counseling preferences

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
current and preferred prenatal counseling practices in 3 domains (organization, content, decision-making)
Time Frame: during the time of the survey (march 2015 - march 2016)
during the time of the survey (march 2015 - march 2016)
evaluation of the decision made (decisional conflict and regret)
Time Frame: during the time of the survey (march 2015 - march 2016)
during the time of the survey (march 2015 - march 2016)
qualitative explored specific preferences in content, influencing factors on organization and decision-making
Time Frame: during the interviews (may - june 2015)
during the interviews (may - june 2015)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complications

Clinical Trials on survey and interview

3
Subscribe