Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage vs Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy in Perforated Acute Diverticulitis: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (STELLA Study) (STELLA)

August 26, 2019 updated by: Dario Tartaglia, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage vs Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy in Perforated Acute Diverticulitis: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) has recently been emerging as an effective alternative to laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated acute diverticulitis (CAD) (Modified Hinchey's classification grade II non-responder to conservative therapy and grade III). Aim of the study is to evaluate which surgical strategy, between LPL and LS, could give better results in patients with CAD

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In the literature, there is no consensus about the role of the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in the management of complicated acute diverticulitis. Recently, three important prospective randomized-control studies (SCANDIV, LOLA, DILALA) have reported contradicting conclusions, as two of them (SCANDIV and LOLA) state that LPL is not superior to sigmoidectomy for the high reoperation rate and morbidity, while DILALA confirms that LPL is feasible and safe in the short-term. To our knowledge, no international guidelines promote the use of LPL in complicated acute diverticulitis. We believe this technique could be safely used in a selected cohort of patients and, in some circumstances, could represent a "bridge" to a possible planned resection. The aim of the study is to collect and analyze the multicentric data of the LPL and LS and give a substantial contribution to the scientific community about this very debated topic.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tuscany
      • Pisa, Tuscany, Italy, 56021
        • Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with complicated acute diverticulitis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute abdominal pain,
  • Signs of localized or diffuse peritonitis
  • Signs of suspected perforated diverticulitis (diagnostic imaging)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Septic shock
  • Immunodepression
  • Previous multiple abdominal surgical operations
  • Modified Hinchey's grade IV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 1
Patients who undergo Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage
LPL is done by irrigation with at least 6 L of warm saline throughout the abdominal cavity and after that, putting a drain in Douglas cavity through the port sites
Group 2
Patients who have a laparoscopically approached sigmoidectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Short-term Morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Short-term Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Optimal Sepsis Control
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Post-operative Re-interventions Rate
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean Postoperative Time
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Average Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 30 day
30 day
Recurrent Colonic Diverticulitis Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incisional Hernia Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Diverticulitis

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage

Subscribe