A Feasibility Study of N-acetylcysteine for Self-injurious Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (NAC)

January 7, 2021 updated by: Lawrence Scahill, MSN, PhD, Emory University
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of a 9-week, randomized trial of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) compared to placebo in 14 children (age 5 to 12 years) with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and a moderate level of repetitive self-injurious behavior (SIB). Additional aims are to evaluate the positive predictive value of a screening method to classify children with automatically maintained self-injurious behavior; to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of NAC for reducing repetitive SIB in children with ASD; and to evaluate biomarkers and possible mechanisms of action of NAC in children with ASD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can cause physical harm to the child and interfere with the child's ability to make use of educational programs and helpful treatments such as speech therapy. The turmoil caused by self-injurious behaviors in children with ASD invariably interferes with daily routines because family life often stops during these episodes and family members worry about setting off SIB between episodes. This project will use the detailed assessment methods developed in the field of behavior therapy to evaluate the potential for N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to treat children with ASD and moderate repetitive SIB. NAC is an over-the-counter dietary supplement that may have beneficial effects on the brain through its well-documented antioxidant effects and/or reduced glutamate signaling. In the proposed study, 14 children with ASD and repetitive SIB between the ages of 5 and 12 will be randomly assigned to gradually increasing doses of NAC or placebo for 9 weeks. The research team, parents and children will be blind to the treatment with NAC or placebo. Participants will come to the research site periodically to complete measures and behavioral assessments.

After the 9 weeks of treatment, children randomized to NAC who showed improvement will be encouraged to continue taking the supplement outside the study. Children who were randomly assigned to the placebo and showed no improvement will be offered open-label treatment with NAC. Children who did not improve while taking NAC or those who improved while on the placebo will be advised on next steps by the study team.

The goal of this feasibility study is establish the acceptability viability of study procedures in this vulnerable population, to learn about the potential benefits and adverse effects of NAC. Demonstrating these feasibility aims and the preliminary efficacy and safety of NAC is a prerequisite for planning a larger, more definitive, study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Marcus Autism Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
  • Confirmed presence of moderate Self Injurious Behavior (SIB)
  • Score > 16 on the parent-rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability subscale (moderate level of disruptive behavior)
  • Classified as having automatically maintained SIB (determined during screening by a detailed functional analysis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On a stable medication dose for less than 4 weeks
  • Planned change in medication during the 9-week trial
  • Had one or more seizures in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participants taking NAC
Participants randomized to the active treatment study arm will receive gradually increasing doses of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) given as a dissolving tablet in juice or water. NAC is an over-the-counter oral dietary supplement that will be used a higher than usual doses in this study.

Participants will start with taking 900mg of NAC once per day for one week (study days 1-7). At Day 7, parents (or primary caregiver) and subjects will return to the study site to review adverse events.

In the absence of dose limiting adverse events attributable to the study drug, the dose will be gradually increased to 900 mg twice per day for study days 8-28.

If this dose is well-tolerated, the dose will be increased to 900 three times per day for study days 29-63.

Other Names:
  • NAC
Placebo Comparator: Participants taking Placebo
Participants randomized to placebo will receive dissolving tablets identical in size and appearance to the active treatment. Placebo capsules contain inactive ingredients.

Participants will start with taking 900mg of the placebo once per day for one week (study days 1-7). At Day 7, parents (or primary caregiver) and subjects will return to the study site to review adverse events. The dosing for the placebo will increase in the same fashion as the active treatment.

In the absence of dose limiting adverse events attributable to the study drug, the dose will be gradually increased to 900 mg twice per day for study days 8-28.

If this dose is well-tolerated, the dose will be increased to 900 three times per day for study days 29-63.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Randomized
Time Frame: 12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Goal: randomize 1.75 participants per month
12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Attrition Rate
Time Frame: 12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Attrition rate is defined as the percent of subjects who did not complete the study. Goal:less than 15% (to indicate that study was acceptable to participants and parents).
12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Study Medication Compliance
Time Frame: 12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Goal: at least 70% treatment compliance (tablet counts and drug dairies).
12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Successful Collection of Outcome Measures
Time Frame: 12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Goal: at least 80% collection of essential outcome data to demonstrate the feasibility of data collection procedures.
12 months (throughout the duration of the study)
Parent Satisfaction Rating
Time Frame: Week 9 (at the end of the study intervention)
Goal: at least 80% of parents will agree or strongly agree when asked in an anonymous survey that they would recommend the study and the study treatment to other parents of children with ASD and SIB.
Week 9 (at the end of the study intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Predictive Value of Screening Method of Classifying Self-injurious Behavior (SIB) by Type.
Time Frame: 12 months (duration of the study)

Goal: at least 75% positive predictive value of our screening method to classify children with automatically maintained self-injurious behavior using a semi-structured interview at screening compared to the findings of five- to six-hour functional analysis at baseline. Only children who appear to have automatically maintained SIB will be referred for the baseline evaluation.

Demonstrating a high positive predictive value for the screening method is a necessary prerequisite for launching a larger study. Using the formula: Positive Predictive Value (PPV) = screen positive and true cases ÷ all positive screens, a value of 75% or greater would indicate success of the screening method used.

12 months (duration of the study)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale Score at Baseline and 9 Weeks Post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 9
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a commonly used 58-item parent-rated measure of overall behavioral problems. The Irritability subscale is comprised of 15 items reflecting tantrums, aggression and self injury. Range is 0 to 45, higher scores indicate higher severity. As a preliminary efficacy outcome, it was calculated the average score at baseline and Week 9 post-intervention.
Baseline, Week 9
Number of Self-Injurious Behavior Events
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 9
Direct observation of the frequency of SIB was collected at baseline in a separate observational session after completing the functional analysis and again at Week 9. Investigators set a benchmark of an average decline in the frequency of SIB of 50% within the NAC group.
Baseline, Week 9
Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) Scale at 9 Weeks Post-intervention
Time Frame: Week 9
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) scale is a 7-item scale from 1 (Very Much Improved) through 4 (No Change) to 7 (Very Much Worse). By convention, scores of 2 (Much Improved) or 1 (Very Much Improved) are used to define positive response.
Week 9
Change in Biomarkers and Possible Mechanisms of Action of NAC in Children With ASD.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 9
Changes amino acid levels before and after NAC treatment: cysteine/cystine and glutathione/glutathione disulfide (GSH/GSSG) ratios (antioxidant effects), glutamate and glutamate/glutamine ratio (glutamate signaling) and GABA levels.
Baseline, Week 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Scahill, MSN, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on N-acetylcysteine

Subscribe