Treatment of Primary Hyperparathyroidism With Denosumab and Cinacalcet. (DENOCINA)

May 1, 2021 updated by: Peter Vestergaard

The only known cure for primary hyperparathyroidism is surgical removal of one or more parathyroid glands. Some patients however, do not fulfill criteria for surgery or do not want to undergo a procedure due to fear of the associated risks. Therefore a medical alternative is warranted.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of Denosumab alone, and in combination with Cinacalcet, as a medical treatment for patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism, with mild osteoporosis. To the best of our knowledge no previously reported randomized controlled trial has investigated the use of denosumab in primary hyperparathyroidism.

60 patients will be enrolled in three different treatment-groups: 20 receiving both Denosumab and Cinacalcet, 20 Denosumab and placebo and 20 placebo and placebo. Patients included do not meet the criteria for, or have no wish for a surgical procedure.

By combining the two drugs, this study could possibly contribute to the discovery of a realistic medical alternative to surgery. It is expected that the therapy will be able to both control s-calcium and s-intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and simultaneously enhance bone-structure. The therapy thus has the potential of preventing fractures and possibly other long-term effects of primary hyperparathyroidism such as formation of kidney stones, and coronary calcification. Another objective of this project is to investigate whether the combined therapy can facilitate an actual reset of the Calcium-sensing receptor, and thereby de facto cure the disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background/Context:

This project deals with medical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. The only cure currently available is surgical removal of one or more parathyroid glands, but this option is neither feasible, nor desirable in all patients with the diagnosis.

Today a major group of patients are being diagnosed by coincidence with biochemical blood-screening, and are therefore in an asymptomatic state of the disease at the time of diagnosis. Long term studies show that these patients over time often have progression in their disease, and develop complications such as osteoporosis. Thus a medical alternative is warranted.

Previous studies have investigated the effects of well known antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates, as well as estrogen-related compounds. These drugs have had effects on particularly bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical bone-turnover markers, but have been able only transiently to lower blood-calcium levels. Combined with too many unwanted side-effects and a high prevalence of contraindications for a large proportion of the patients needing treatment, these drugs have not provided a realistic alternative to surgery.

Treatment today generally follows the international consensus for treatment of asymptomatic patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Briefly this includes watchful waiting with biannual control-sessions for indication of surgery, screening for kidney stones/nephrolithiasis, osteoporosis and s-calcium - and s-iPTH levels.

This randomized controlled trial involves the drugs Cinacalcet og Denosumab. Denosumab has previously been shown to greatly improve BMD, lower s-calcium, lower the rate of bone-turnover and prevent osteoporotic fractures in several populations with different diseases, but has never been tested in a published randomized controlled trial in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Cinacalcet has been proved able to lower s-iPTH, lower s-Calcium and thereby relieve symptoms of hypercalcaemia caused by primary hyperparathyroidism. It does not however, lower the rate of bone turnover, and it has not been show to improve BMD.

By combining the two drugs, this study could possibly contribute to the discovery of a realistic medical alternative to surgery. It is expected that the therapy will be able to both control s-calcium and s-iPTH, and simultaneously enhance bone-structure. The therapy thus has the potential of preventing fractures and possibly other long-term effects of primary hyperparathyroidism such as formation of kidney stones, and coronary calcification. Another objective of this project is to investigate whether the combined therapy can facilitate an actual reset of the Calcium-sensing receptor, and thereby de facto cure the disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Aalborg University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women of 18 years of age or older.
  • T-score by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) between -1,0 og -3,5
  • Patients from The North Jutland Region diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism at the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital. (Hypercalcaemia measured at two different time-points and simultaneous elevated/inappropriately high PTH, and exclusion of differential diagnosis.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical history of diseases leading to hypercalcaemia other than Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
  • Patients being treated with Denosumab or Cinacalcet prior to inclusion or previously treated with Denosumab or Cinacalcet.
  • Moderately - Severely decreased liver function (alanine aminotransferase >250u/l, gamma-glutamyl transferase>150u/l, Bilirubin >30)
  • Acute myocardial infarction or apoplexia in the 3 months before inclusion.
  • Medical record of heart failure
  • Risk factors of prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc).
  • Open lesions from oral surgery.
  • Primary diseases of the bone other than osteoporosis.
  • Patients suffering from kidney disease or renal failure.
  • Patients under treatment with thiazide or lithium.
  • Medical record of generalized seizures or epilepsy.
  • Active malignant disease.
  • Known allergies towards the specified medicinal products (IMPs).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Fertile women who do not agree to the usage of effective contraception.
  • Other circumstances, evaluated by the responsible investigator, making the subject unsuitable for participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined treatment.
20 subjects will be treated with combined 60mg denosumab bi-annually , 30 mg cinacalcet daily and 50 micrograms vitamin-D daily.
Participants in one arm will receive 30 mg cinacalcet each day.
Other Names:
  • Mimpara
  • Sensipar
Participants in two arms will receive 60 mg Denosumab biannually.
Other Names:
  • Prolia
  • Xgeva
Active Comparator: Monotherapy
20 subjects will receive 60mg denosumab bi-annually, placebo and 50 micrograms vitamin-D daily.
Participants in two arms will receive 60 mg Denosumab biannually.
Other Names:
  • Prolia
  • Xgeva
Participants in two arms will receive one placebo-tablet each day.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
20 subjects will receive a saline injection bi-annually (blinded), placebo-tablets and 50 micrograms vitamin-D daily.
Participants in two arms will receive one placebo-tablet each day.
Participants in one arm will receive saline injections as placebo for denosumab.
Other Names:
  • Sodium Chloride (NaCl) Fresenius "Kabi"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year
Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.
Baseline,one year
Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year
Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.
Baseline,one year
Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year
Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.
Baseline,one year
Change in 1/3 Forearm Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year
Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.
Baseline,one year
Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year

Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

Baseline,one year
Percentage Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year

Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

Baseline,one year
Percentage Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year

Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

Baseline,one year
Percentage Change in 1/3 Forearm Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline,one year

Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

Baseline,one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Volumetric BMD for the Lumbar Spine.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.
Baseline, one year
Mean P-calcium During Treatment.
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.
Monthly up to one year.
Percent Change From Baseline in P-carboxy-terminal Collagen Crosslinks (CTX)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
p-CTX, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Median Agatstons Score Final
Time Frame: Baseline, one year

Simultaneously with QCT-measurements coronary calcification was be assessed. Agatston score is a score based on the extent of coronary artery calcification calculated on the amount of plaque observed in a CT scan. A score of zero indicates absence of coronary calcium, 1-10: minimal calcification, 11-100 mild calcification, 101-400 moderate calcification, >400 severe calcification.

Thus the score increases with increasing level of calcification in the coronary vessels.

Baseline, one year
Patients With Nephrolithiasis Final Scan.
Time Frame: Patients with nephrolithiasis at one year reported.
Number of subjects w. renal stones at final scan.
Patients with nephrolithiasis at one year reported.
Patients With Pancreas-calcifications Final Scan.
Time Frame: Patients with pancreas-calcifications at one year reported.
By QCT.
Patients with pancreas-calcifications at one year reported.
Reset of the Calcium Sensing Receptor?
Time Frame: 2 weeks after termination of medication.
Measured from effect on s-calcium and PTH weeks after termination of IMP
2 weeks after termination of medication.
Vertebral Fracture Assessment - Final Scan
Time Frame: Patients with vertebral fractures at one year reported.
Number of participants with vertebral fractures as assessed by VFA at final scan.
Patients with vertebral fractures at one year reported.
Change MDI-score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 mths, one year.

Major Depression Inventory (MDI)-score, Baseline, 6 months, one year (week 52)., change between baseline and 1 year reported.

The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is a mood questionnaire developed by the World Health Organization. To calculate the total score, a sum of ten individual items (each with an individual score between 0-5, with 0 indicating absence of a symptom and 5 indicating constant presence of a given symptom) is used. A higher score signifies deeper depression with 50 being the maximum score.

Baseline, 6 mths, one year.
Adverse Reactions.
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.

All participants filled in questionnaires regarding symptoms related to the treatment.

Results are reported in the Adverse Events section.

Monthly up to one year.
Bone Mineral Content
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Measured at baseline and after one year at the lumbar spine and distal 1/3 of the non-dominant antebrachii.
Baseline, one year
Change in Cortical Width.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year.
Measured at baseline and after one year at the distal non-dominant antebrachii.
Baseline, one year.
Change in Volumetric BMD for the Distal Forearm.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.
Baseline, one year
Percentage Change in Volumetric BMD for the Lumbar Spine.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.
Baseline, one year
Percentage Change in Volumetric BMD for the Distal Forearm.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.
Baseline, one year
Mean p-PTH During Treatment.
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.
Monthly up to one year.
Mean p-Phosphate During Treatment.
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.
Monthly up to one year.
Percent Change From Baseline in p-N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (p-P1NP).
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
p-P1NP, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in P-osteocalcin.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
p-osteocalcin, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in S-bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP).
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
S-Bone specific alkaline phosphatase, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in p-Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (Trap5b).
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
P-Trap5b, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in p-Sclerostin.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
P-Sclerostin, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in P-fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23).
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
P-FGF23 , change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Changes in p-25-vitamin D
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
P-25-vitD , change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Changes in s-1,25-vitamin D
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
S-1,25-vitD, change from baseline at 48 weeks.
Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.
Patients With Nephrocalcinosis, Final Scan.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year
Number of subjects w. renal calcifications at final scan.
Baseline, one year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Measures
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
Biochemical measures of changes in liver, infection, kidney and electrolyte-status and urinary excretion of calcium.
Monthly up to one year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julius Simoni Leere, MD, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital
  • Study Director: Peter Vestergaard, DMSc, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on Cinacalcet 30 mg Tablet

Subscribe